World War II was a trauma, not just for George Soros. The "United States of Europe" – invented as an antidote and implemented precisely within the framework of the EU Treaty changes – is, however, an highly utopian, left-wing, anti-family and anti-human task in its essence. What is more, it is simply a task that is being forced upon us, due to the fact that we were neither asked about the opinion nor offered an alternative. Did our grandparents fight for the liquidation of Poland on all fronts of Europe? The upcoming elections to the EU Parliament play for the highest stake.
In order to see the direction in which the European Community is moving, see our detailed review with the translation of threatening Treaty changes in the EU (HERE).
Today's European Union (after many years of gradual closer cooperation) was born thanks to the Maastricht Treaty, signed on 7 February 1992 (it entered into force in 1993). Its basis was the rule of “4 freedoms”, i.e. freedom of movement of persons, goods, finances and services. Though her beginnings The European Coal and Steel Community, established in 1952 and later in the European Communities, has been taking extremist steps beyond the first assumptions of economical cooperation and peace.
These are steps not only more and more anti-family, but moving distant from the first assumptions of the Union, which at first existed as a form of cooperation between sovereign states (Schuman Declaration of 9 May 1950). Today, the EU is emerging to us as an increasingly bureaucratic and independent body that dictates to its members what to do. The chosen direction even deprives Poland of sovereignty, especially with already dangerous changes, specified as the alleged green governance or immigration policy, which are increasingly draining and draining the sense of safety and pockets of average citizens.
SEE ALSO: Welcome to the National March of Life 2024!
The European Union only for meek VIPs?
The European Union is no longer an global organization, nor the “gathering of the peoples of Europe”, which Schuman mentioned, but increasingly superstate and large overseer, or even large Brother. The European Union is becoming increasingly degenerate. So what if the area of the household (on an exclusive basis) and the area of law (as a shared area under Article 4: "freedom, security, justice") remained under the Lisbon Treaty under the work of individual countries? It has long been a dead legislation, due to the fact that the European Union has been crossing the allowed borders without pardon, simply trying to absorb Poland and another countries.
We have already agreed besides much to limit our sovereignty. It turns out that Poles will gotta watch their own country from behind the fence, like residents of Warsaw Ursynów European College in Natolin. It is an ancient royal hunting palace and magnate residence with monuments of classicism of this class as the Royal Bathrooms and treasures of nature of this class as the Białowieża Forest. Apart from regular and fast guided tours, available only during the period and only on weekends (which are rapidly disappearing tickets from the district), average Kowalski is not allowed here. It's not allowed because... there's 1 of 2 European staff institutions that is effectively isolated from the environment. The beauty of this area can be admired only on movieBecause the introduction is only for VIPs. Meanwhile, the Union wants to improvement and format our reality so that only verified citizens (and states) can benefit from it. The strongest will be the primacy: France and Germany (this has already been mentioned reasonably by Schumann... and G. Soros).
George Soros women
"We live in the times of the revolution", "The game is at the highest stake: the endurance of our civilization," George Soros thundered in his book "In the defence of Open Society" in 2019. It is hard to disagree with him, only that forced integration and elimination of national identity is simply a dangerous utopia. Soros called for a extremist improvement of the European Union towards greater integration and transformation of "obsolete treaties".
"Debt reforms must be carried out at all level, from the Union itself, starting by the associate States and ending at the electorate itself" (i.e. p. 29), he called for Soros and kept on saying. Among the countries to be reformed in particular, he mentioned Poland and Hungary. "The inability to change the Treaty provisions" and "the deficiency of legal tools to discipline those associate States that violate the Union's founding principles" (i.e. p. 133) saw as a threat, unfortunately not totalitarianism. He powerfully called for "to radically come up with it [EU] again" (these assumptions are besides described in a loud text published before the erstwhile European elections. “Europe wake up” available on ING).
The United States of Europe has besides supported Winston Churchill, and the implementation of the federalization imagination of Europe in the superstate has formulated in Manifesto with Ventotene Altiero Spinelli (d.1986), which present results in a leading ideologist of the EU (more about it we compose about) HERE). "There will come a day erstwhile we will build the United States of Europe that we will go thin over Schuman's grave and visit his home in Scy-Chazelles, just as the Americans go to visit George Washington's home in Mount Vernon," declared Jean Rey, from 1967 to 1970 president of the Commission of the European Communities.
SEE ALSO: Superstate? How about a large fall? What awaits the European Union?
Without God and fact about man
The problem is that Europe is increasingly distant from declared freedom, democracy, equality, solidarity and respect for human dignity, as it proudly recalls on the website dedicated to its EU side for pioneers. The thought of God is not here at all. Peace begins in human hearts, which, as Christians believe, transforms the Savior with his power. Without it, only dreams and utopia (here the utopia of the EU, which grants itself besides far-reaching competences). A valueless democracy transforms into open or camouflaged totalitarianism – warned John Paul II, and banal greed easy takes the place of the sign of expected freedom – 1 might add.
Often cited in the context of federalization as an example of the United States of America, fresh lands were colonized in a completely different way, not mature and very different countries. Recognising the selfishness of EU associate States is evidence of realism. Forced unification under the appearance of federalization is the way to nowhere. Besides, it'd be good for us to be asked. It is besides worth raising and arguing to manage public opinion in specified a fresh Europe, since most media are in left-wing hands.
Step by step towards the alleged federalisation
The federalization task developed gradually. "White Paper on the Future of Europe. Reflections and scenarios on the future of the EU-27 by 2025" (LINK) – a European Commission paper of 17 March 2017 – contained 5 EU improvement scenarios. It turns out that it has been decided to implement script 5 – the most radical, where "Member States will decide to share more powers, resources and decisions in all areas".
On May 9, 2022 it was held Conference on the Future of Europe (CoFE)which has achieved 49 proposals and 326 measures/indicators. These proposals afraid issues specified as climate change and the environment, health, stronger economy, social justice and jobs, The EU in the world, values and rights, regulation of law, security, digital transformation, European democracy, migration, education, culture, youth and sport. Among another things, these proposals were inspired by the proposed Treaty amendments (245 proposals).
SEE ALSO: “NO-Year-Old Cinema”: Yuri Biezmatov – fulfilled the prophecies of the russian agent
What's next? Polish liquidation
The European Parliament formally initiated the procedure for amending the Treaties on 22 November 2023. The Union is increasingly turning towards anti-democratic and totalitarian towards federalisation. Meanwhile, there is simply a unusual silence in Europe. Officially, this kind of change, known as the euphemist "change in the form of the EU", is being tried to justify the request for the Union to function efficiently, peculiarly in the face of geopolitical challenges. But here is the basic question: why would specified "efficiency" and specified a Union serve? Finally, possibly the most crucial question: did our grandparents fight for the liquidation of Poland on all fronts of Europe? The upcoming elections to the EU Parliament play for the highest stake.
SEE ALSO:
