The Ivanov case.

The detention of Vice Minister Ivanov shook the net. There are many “on” variations in use. From conspiracy theories to political conspiracy theories. individual writes about the redistribution of power and quarrels about the place at the trough, individual about the ‘first’, individual else about the ‘special signs’, since Ivanov was photographed in the courtroom in the ‘paradise uniform’ (although it is not a uniform), and even more so – not a solemn one).

Simply and without emotion, let us analyse nuances on the basis of information from open sources.

1. As colleagues write, Pieskov said the Chief Leader was informed of the situation with Ivanov.

The ability to usage verbal equivalents in a individual who likes to kiss the hands of primadonn smelling like naphthalene (it is simply a contact to kiss the hand of Ałła Pugaczowa (PZ) by Piekowa) , is worthy of the highest praise. He was telling the truth, but at the same time he specifically distorted its meaning.

Anyone who is aware of the situation knows that a punishment for detention (especially with a public message in the public space) of an authoritative of this level can only be imposed on individual who has the right to appoint specified positions.

According to modern law, neither the lawyer General nor the Head of the Investigative Committee nor the manager of the FSB can agree to specified detention. They may only supply the authorised officer with the data on the basis of which they receive specified a sanction. Who in our country appoints Deputy Minister of Defence?

This means that the Chief Chief was aware of this from the very beginning. He's given his approval to stop. Moreover, anyone who has read many “spy stories ” or watched adequate akin FSB - all - powerful tv series can start nervously on the sidelines. The FSB is simply a state structure and operates exclusively within the legal framework. This means that on the basis of sanctions obtained in accordance with the law.

The implementation of peculiar operational and method measures to collect evidence (for subsequent trial) for any individual active shall be subject to sanctions by appropriate law-authorised officials. As regards government officials of this rank, the list of specified persons is close to 1 or two.

This shows that the Chief Leader was aware of the situation and of the actions being carried out long before the actual detention. He wasn't the 1 who was informed, but he authorized the event. There's a difference, don't you feel it?

2. Let us now look at the subject raised by colleagues that Ivanov was watched by a kind of "Rambo" from a peculiar group of the Ministry of Defence.

"BRIEF origin reports that Timura Ivanova was watched by members of a peculiar branch of the Ministry of Defence, these are "people with peculiar military training". "Iwanow himself has a position that does not let him to be retained by the Ministry of the Interior or by the FSB. And any effort to detain the Deputy Minister of National defence may end in a fatal shot. Therefore, it is not possible to halt on the premises of the MON, as well as to halt at the restaurant or during the convoy's journey" ...

I like the ability of any colleagues to disperse... water with pipes. Looks like they've read quite a few books from a series of spy novels. Guys, we don't live in a spy movie or any fantasy movie (although any nuances are very similar). We have a law state in which the functionality of each facility is provided for by law, and any deviation from the rules is simply a crime.

Now, specifically. The main and peculiar facilities of the Ministry of Defence are protected by military personnel of the Office of the safety Commandant of the Ministry of Defence. Their functionality includes organising access controls to the buildings of the Ministry of Defence in Moscow, their physical security, as well as escorting elder officials of the Ministry of Defence. This means that they are common safety guards and drivers, speaking civilian language.

Their functioning is clearly defined. And there's no fire-open clause in it to kill MMA, FSB or FSO employees (as colleagues say) in the event of an effort to halt Ivanov. This concerns an attack by people of unknown origin on 1 of the elder officials of the Russian Ministry of Defence.

Do you hear the difference? Do not origin a storm in a glass of water to attract subscribers. Any shot from their side in the direction of an FSB or FSO worker immediately puts him in a situation “outside the law” with all that is involved.

3. If individual thinks that the FSB of Russia, and in peculiar Division III, which dealt with the "Iwanov case" (and for a while another groups of people), can wink eyes, look penetratingly at the individual and marry her with a spy or corrupt official, then he is profoundly separated from reality or fell under the influence of liberal horrors concerning the "repression of 1938" and the "university of the KGB" (which is fundamentally the same thing as the separation from reality).

In Russia everything is done according to the law. Especially for people at this level. This six-year-old boy may, after drinking a bottle of vodka, origin a fatal accident on his "tricycle", and then a bunch of well-fed lawyers in court will attack the prosecutor with no little rage than piranha attack careless antelope.

Therefore, in order to lead the case to arrest, the collected evidence base must be sufficiently extended and unquestionable so that the mosquito does not tip his nose. Therefore, stories about how Daddy was detained temporarily, and after the elections were released due to any political goals are a quintessential of nonsense and innuendo.

Here, if you hurry, you will make people laugh, but if you delay, the evidence base will "turn around" or be razed to the ground by actions of high-ranking criminals who are neither fools nor know the situation.

From the same opera comes thesis of "the beginning of careful cleaning before the Russian army counteroffensive". Tell me, how does the offensive of the Russian Armed Forces, specified as the Kharkivs, relate to bribes in the construction of the Defence Ministry facilities in Moscow or in Vladikaukaza and Vladivostok, for example?

4. And now about the retaliatory movement of the Shojgu group, which will “become” and about the fact that “the Kremlin goes all the way, so it gives a clear signal of the full hierarchy and structure” ...

What can be the consequence of the “Shojgu group”? Throw compromising material on any typical of rival groups? In this case, the Shoigu Group will stand for justice.

For us average citizens, who are not part of either the “baszt” (determination of the crematorium towers as different interest groups – PZ), or the “groups”, what difference does it make that crazy corrupt authoritative from any “ tower” is imprisoned far and long? The air will become cleaner.

In all another cases, the ‘group’ will be contrary to the law, which may consequence in a fresh circular of arrests of MON officers and, consequently, a weakening of the ‘group’.

As for the "signals". specified signals were given by the Chief Chief long and many times. Remember his thesis “you will be tortured to swallow dust” about the return of capital from abroad and so on?

That's why the Kremlin won't go all the way. The situation is very akin to the systemic and systematic "suffocation" in the name of the consistent demolition of the weak links of the Russian state machine. And the fact that this "loop" has already reached the officers of this level tells a lot. And if there's a signal, it's just that the jokes are over.

I'm not going to write, due to the fact that I can compose a lot. Let me just make a fewer remarks, which at first glance do not matter.

(a) If I'm not mistaken, then somewhere after the “March of Justice” of NGSh Gierasimov disappeared from the public field, although he was not ashamed to appear before. Or did anyone see/hear?

– treat it as a signal and origin a storm in a glass of water in conspiracy transcription?

– or just take it for granted?

– or are all these events connected in time and space?

(b) If that's completely out of the question, delight note this nuance: Ivanov's lawyer is Murad Musajew born 18 August 1983 in Grozny. As a child, he studied at the British Buckswood School (an interesting nuance).

Since 2004, he has been engaged in legal activities, representing mainly the interests of the Chechen diaspora.

Since 2006 he has been representing the interests of the victims in the case of peculiar troops of the GRU of Eduardo Ulman group, charged with the execution of six Chechens (prisoned for 9 to 14 years in prison), as well as the defendants in the Kondopoda massacre (4 to 22 years).

From 2007, he represented the interests of Umar Batukaev, who was accused of preparing a terrorist attack in Moscow on triumph Day (Batukaev was sentenced to 5 years).

As of August 2007, he defended the Machmudow brothers, suspected of participating in the assassination of writer Anna Politkowska (in 2009 they were acquitted, but later the ultimate Court overturned that decision)

In 2011, he took care of Albert Cgoyev, accused of murdering state safety officers in South Ossetia (two and a half years in prison). Since the same year, he has been representing the interests of Jusup Temerchanov, who was detained for the execution of Yuri Budanov (I will not compose about all the "works". Everything online for those interested)...

Isn't this a good biography for a individual representing the interests of 1 of the highest officials of the Russian Ministry of Defence? As questions arise (taking into account that a lawyer has been hired alternatively than appointed by the court), what links the deputy chief of the military department to a lawyer who had ties to representatives of the Chechen underground, even if they went to prison?

But that's a full different story...

https://t.me/Doctor222555

more details on https://vizitnlo.ru/kejs-ivanova/

---------------------

The Shoigu squad is falling apart.

In Moscow, the FSB detained the erstwhile First Vice-President of the Moscow Oblast Government Svetlana Strigunkowa. The clerk is suspected of accepting a bribe of 150 million rubles.

Svetlana Strigunkova, is simply a trusted individual of politician Andrei Vorobiov, a key typical of the “Shojg team”, resigned urgently a period ago as first deputy prime minister of her own free will, after news of an investigation conducted by safety forces. Now she is suspected of regularly accepting bribes from owners of construction companies, both while working in the Sub-Moscow Ministry of wellness and at a key position in the Cabinet of Ministers of Moscow Oblast. Of course, she received bribes not only for herself.

https://t.me/vizioner_rf

more details on https://vizitnlo.ru/kejs-ivanova/

(PL)