Zorro, or fox, Karwe-lis

Jerzy Karwelishttps://journalistzarazy.pl/30-05-sorro-czyla-lis-karwe-lis/

May 30th. entry No 1358

Welcome to support my blog

Audio version

Promotion of my book. Welcome to the reading!

Promotion code: elites10

== sync, corrected by elderman ==

Ridiculous voter silence is coming, and so I print this post on Friday, so that there is no reason for me not to watch myself, although I hope that the text comes to the election and does not meet the conditions of electoral agitation. In fact, I will not compose about circumstantial candidates, but about what image Poland has revealed to us in this campaign. due to the fact that it is expected to be a time of solstice, and at specified moments, the next “most crucial elections in the 3rd Poland” are falling masks, due to the fact that it works on the rhyme and matters the result, even at the expense of losing the remains of the nurtured image. So you can look under the mask of the 3rd Republic of Poland to see its actual features. And that's what we're going to be doing here, like run cases.

Bear money, money

It is so in the post-politics society that erstwhile a sovereign with the memory of a golden fish is subjected to any kind of information pressure, he forgets about it. It disowns, or does not think about it, or internalizes, when, under the influence of skillfully sedated propaganda, it begins to accept earlier controversy as a average thing, and as a consequence self-interpreted by itself. This fact, which has been encumbered since the beginning of the campaign, even before Nawrocki was elected as a civilian candidate for PiS, was to cut Kaczyński's group off from subsidies to political parties, at a crucial pre-campaign moment. Although the minister began to pay the subsidy in instalments, it was not until May, at the end of the campaign, for which he would pay personally, and it was punishable, due to the fact that even the PKW itself, with a sharp individual overturn to the side of the smiling coalition, made it clear that the money belonged to the PiS, and the minister would not be fighting for his political Pupils as for freedom from now on in all election.

Casus PKW shows another weakness of the 3rd Polish Republic in use. It is not a systemic attachment, although it is the strategy that determines specified effects in the long term. They are the reasoning of each of the political groups that if they rule, it will be forever. There are 2 perspectives – both weak for the country. The first is that the guys do systemic things concreteizing their expansion and “exit” to the institutions, but the full thing that I say the achievements falls into the hands of fresh heirs of power. And as with another institutions, it was in the case of PKW. PiS messed up there, but this fresh way of the institution's business was followed by fresh winners and occupied PKW, but adequate to challenge the message of the PiS, which was expected to take distant the grant from him, but not adequate to neglect to surrender after losing at a higher instance, although here the minister – on his own criminal work – did not fulfil his duties for long.

The second position of burrowing in the state has a smaller dimension, but by mass scale it besides harms the country. Its character has an individual dimension, or interest groups, that hold institutions to catch on and quickly, due to the fact that in a four-year (no, the top – eight-year) word and disappear. They're the ones that the Bodnarists are following present and putting in. But in this way, the trampled sons of bitches become a ready-to-take network, just adequate to fill this map with their own and the strategy works precisely the same, only the money flows in the other direction. And it is said that it is not lawful to drive distant the flies that eat open to you, for they will eat and leave, and that the driving of them will bring only fresh ones, which will besides want to feed, but again. And elections are specified a fly chase, hence the suckling power of Poland, in a continuous and repetitive way. We just have a full series of raids of new, hungry flies that land on the open wound of the 3rd Republic of Poland.

But let's get back to the campaign. The movement initiated at the entrance was to deprive the PiS of the means at the outset, no substance what the Cossack they would put on, and so it was specified a decision as in the Gladiator film, where before fighting on the public grandstand a sneaky rival puts a secret blow under the bowl, so that the people would see a "honest" fight, though the opponent is fatally weakened. As it has been said – it has been a long time since the case, however, the blow with the subsidy was made publicly, though denied and no 1 remembers this basic imbalance in a fair fight. I do not hold here, God forbid, the PiS parties, due to the fact that I consider the full substance of financing the organization to be a highly harmful Polish system. He is to perpetuate the Polish two-field, due to the fact that only the rich will be added, and the mediocre will be taken away. This strengthens the existing structure: for taxpayers' money 2 parties (with additives) play a deadly fight, while the rest, due to the system-financial advantage, is not to go beyond the expression of plankton.

Not only that – the plankton is inactive being thrown under the feet of the strategy logs at the entrance, specified as the process of collecting signatures, which in the case of large ones passes systemicly after organization members, and the plankton must collect by hand, which is hindered by... the system, due to the fact that at the same time it requires the support of the PESEL application on the list, and at the same time warns in the run that PESEL should not give to just anyone, due to the fact that it is dangerous. As a last resort, he'll drop off a couple of dead people in the mail., he'll sweep the small letters By checking their signatures for light, whether there is simply a shortcut to the city name and whether there is simply a deficiency of a second name, while a large will check random samples from hundreds of boxes filled on the way – I think that they are prescribed from election to organization lists. The launch was not only systemic against PiS in the form of a withdrawal of grants, but is systematically established, regardless of the rulers, for the protection of double-fielders with the addition of ominous appetizers to the two-course menu.

Media

The run showed the media in light of day. Here, on the ideological front, there is no mercy. As between campaigns we have noodles slow wrapped on the ears, then in periods of intensification you can see media as they are. It is like a drain – not only can you see who was swimming without panties, but you can besides discover what hoofs are buried in a mule and who has a weapon in a upper. On the top, erstwhile there is no electoral drain, we see a dignified swan, and only erstwhile everything is drained out of the crap you can see clearly what black paws are muddy water. And so it was now.

But let's start with the structure itself. There are clearly 2 things: the function of public media, which, regardless of the ruling team, cannot refrain from doing their power well (what they do to it by a series of deadly bear favors) and the another thing – the difference between media pluralism and duality. Let's start with the first one, the public media.

As wise people say – overzealousness is worse than fascism, and that is repeated. The “Fur Deutschland” promoted to vomit by Kurski drowned the PiS, unconditional and shameless public support for Trzaskowski in full besides harmed him. And debates in Koński, and cast them by media workers with evident, whether or not mercantile, not ideological, conflict of interest, it's just a skid. And all this is simple – the presidential election is simply a game about dragging the hesitant, due to the fact that a hard electorate is not enough. The TVP line, taken alive from the ideolo Jaruzel from the martial law, and thus the "fights and agreements" had a devastating effect here. Well, due to the fact that let's just say that the hesitant saw constant attacks on the unsmirked mainstream media and let himself be deceived by Trzaskowski, who abruptly began to talk even... Braun, not to mention Mentzen. Then he went to specified a TVN or TVP and saw that this strategy of political values, which he wanted to expand, was the largest sewage, delicate to delicate minds open to the microphilic, philosomytism, federationism of the union, or globalism. It is simply a surviving contradiction, and it discourages minds seeking coherent answers, and that is the request for hesitaters.

But it is simply a problem of the full run of Trzask, who once, right after the first round, promises to destruct medieval abortion law (as if specified existed in the mediate Ages), and after sitting with Mentzen for an exam ending with a celebrated beer go-out – he speaks freely to the author scandalous for his environment "Mentzen's Friday". Well, there's a large contradiction here, and then there's the pitching. This contradiction is harmless to the hard electorate, as it is justified by the request to dim the fluctuating electorate. The tough guys forgive specified fickles for tactical purposes and forgive any frivolity of their favorite, who “does not think so”, but “says so” to get suckers fooled. Yeah, 'cause the tough guys think they're a bunch of losers and they don't feel bad. They are stupid to them, who are stupid adequate to inactive not choose due to the fact that they hesitate, and there is no request to hesitate – everything is clear for a long time.

But let's go back to the promise to explain the subtle differences between pluralism and dualism in the media. due to the fact that it is not all the same, although – especially in the mouth of the late pursued PiS – the argument of their dung was shown as a sin against pluralism, and it was about returning to the duople more. The media duo is simply a natural reconstruction of the bi-plenity of the political scene. It can't be otherwise. Everyone has to have a bubble, I've been writing about lately.. And this, alternatively of explaining to us the complexity of the world, reduces it to 2 arms of the visor, in which the strategy puts our heads. So this is simply a imagination of little and little coherent (video ideological pitching of the Trzask) truths, but these are 2 truths, simplified to a zero-one choice. This simplifies the imagination of the planet of each tribe, but is not any attractive proposition for the hesitant, and this is about them the full game.

By the way, we have 3 groups of hesitant: those who wonder who to vote for, the others – whether to go to the elections at all – and the 3rd groups that are now in fear are those who hesitate to pass their voices on to whom to pass on their favourite to the choice in the second round. It is easy to see that all these active groups, including an underestimated group of those who will join only in the second round, are the intervention and rescue electorate, or choice of the lesser evil. That reaction wouldn't regulation any worse. And that's where the two-field media cannons are hitting on them. If the choice is to be little inferior, it is not to fight for programs, that is, the goodness of “our” but for how bad the worse 1 is. That's why, to put it mildly, dirty campaign, hooks, charges, pulling dirt. Hence, zero levels of substantive not only in propaganda (this is simply a wonderful mention to the emotions of hysterical crowds), But besides in the debate. Only Stanowski with his hourly formats allowed the people to hear who was truly running.

So the media duo only drags us into the primitive war of 2 tribes, which is Antipodes of pluralism. You'll say social media is an alternate to duopol. But look at how they are consumed: these are 3 proposals on the cross packed with algorithms (not necessarily paid, but more unfortunately ideological ones) that service you the bubbles of mainstream, equal to 3 programs of public tv for communes. Only super specialists are able to sterilely choice the information they receive. Most of it's platform selection, what we get. We simply have, like in a restaurant, a menu of the day for the customer, and we ourselves are pushing ourselves into the hands of “guides on the net”, due to the fact that we do not have the time, tools and desire to break through all day by described by me, and generated by apparent media pluralism – information noise.

Another aspect of the appearance of this lie-pluralism is advertising. We get not what we like, but what individual paid for. It's like consumer brands. It takes large care to dig up any niche supplier and producer, we'd alternatively go to media frogs on all corner to find out what and how. And we learn about the promotions from the media. And so is run politics. For me, the most grim thing is that it's for the taxpayer's own money, coming from a grant, that he's made water from his brain, so he pays for his own folly and to avoid this sad constatus... he yet takes these arguments for his own, even invented by himself. So, as in media Marx – money shapes consciousness.

Fragrance

The run showed us a systemicly established fragmentation of the right. There's quite a few it. The anti-systemists now got a good result, but their fragmentation – systemic, let us repeat – does not make any real force from them. Some, like the Confederate, are suspected of wanting to scope the table, not to overturn it, but to settle down with it. Others, like Braun, give brutally realistic diagnoses, but their demands would only be realized if someway the COPIS established in a strategy disappeared. There's no way to fight the system, just everybody out. Okay, possibly you're right, but how? How, since in this process you will have to, even in a transitional period, measurement on a system-designated arena, and he is not stupid adequate not to see the danger on this side.

The remainder are actually plankton. Where does it come from in Poland? It is from the instilled society of fear of the alleged "lost voice". This is besides a performance game – both tribes in this argument see guarantees of a mutually beneficial two-field. Well, let's see – let's say there is simply a sensible candidate in the presidential run who talks about the sins of the 3rd Republic and shows how he will correct them systemically, has a program and alleged presidential format. Will the people vote for him? No substance what – even the most sensible journalists will say: even he is good to you, but not for today. What's he got there (although he's collecting it in this run right now), interesting, but no chance. And then the same journalists (there's nothing to say about the tribal ones) shed crocodile tears over the weakness of the two- tribe political scene and a burning hope that "the 3rd 1 inactive does not appear." Yes – and erstwhile it appears, the same paraumental device comes on, that it is not about bullshit, it is about saving Poland from the hands of a competitor.

The force to fear a wasted voice is so large that it works even in uncommon moments erstwhile it does not have its pragmatic justification. And that is the minute of the vote in the first round. Tough guys, and as you know how they'll vote, you can give a signal to the system, and here they stay, besides medially, turned on the reflexes of Pavlov's dog. I'll waste my voice on individual who can't pass. But in the first round, at the two-field – it is known that it will not pass, but you can send a signal against the two-field, and in a certain direction, which may just be the first capital of the fresh movement, which it is waiting for, as it turned out during the investigation of February of this year, 58.2% of Poles. And that was mostly the case now. It was these results, not reflecting the scenes of Polish views at all, that both tribes considered the legitimacy not only of their tribes, but of the strategy double-field, as the owner of all ideas for Poland. And there are only ideas about how to gain power, but there is no thought what to do with Poland.

For this, the strategy needs a level of fragmentation, due to the fact that that is what our 2 tribes benefit from. The PiS will fight anyone on the right side, well, but for Mentzen, whom he judges as a future coalitionist, due to the fact that after learning from the last election, he decided that without the coalitionist he could not make it. But, as I know the Law and Justice, there is simply a genetic tendency to engage in the mechanisms of eating appetizers, and this process begins immediately erstwhile the pages count. It's just that the chief organization hates compromises. The fragmentation of the right hand and antisystems besides depends on the another side. They have coalitions changing their legs and let them to freely participate in a controlled coalition depending on the assembly of the majority in parliament. So they fight not at home, but to weaken the Law and Justice. Tusk would care if there was a plankton at Kaczor's, which does 2 things – it gives the material to scare its extremists and – being aware of the precedence of the primate at Kaczyński's right – creates an area to heat conflicts on the right. The fragmentation continues and lasts. It is at the hands of each side, which was expressed by supporting plankton in the existence of its aid in the collection of signatures (PiS) as well as in the publicity by the left-wing mainstream of extremists from the right, extra-scriptural side.

Rolling campaign

As for the state's impact on the campaign, if Tusk were to do the PiS today, we would have a roar in Brussels and the OSCE on our backs. It would be all over the Belarusian standards, but we are in the fumes of a fighting democracy that slows down the assessment of measures to accomplish a noble goal. So that it is not naive – I see how parties usage state and public funds to play for their election teams. This is the price for the deficiency of control over the authorities, the last form of fascist democracy in the service of globalisation – it does not provide. After all, a society divided into tribes will not get excited, or actually will not be excited by the ruling information about system-based drawing from the state's resources to win. And even if it were known and excited about it (which is not conclusive at all), in principle, “we don’t have a coat and what will you do to us?” would have nothing to do with it, due to the fact that all social control mechanisms do not function.

All right, but present we are in the phase of analysing the views of the actual spheres of action of specified a mechanism, and I must say that Tusk's image of the scale and strength of the state's engagement in the influence on elections present exceeded even the scale of imagination. Let's see what's up. First of all, the full mechanics of illegal influence on elections by financing transmissions outside the mandatory electoral committee material path. We had 2 symptoms here, interesting. First, alleged pro-event campaigns. I do not even want to remind you that they are of a character, proven systematically and statistically, to support the left-liberal side. It was the additional voters who gave power to a smiling coalition in 2023. The old ones are dying out, and in order to win with the PiS, who will go in the right ranks anyway, you just gotta knock the young out of laziness, and they already know where to go and what to do. Now, however, this was no longer enough: there was a foundation funded, among others, from the USAID post-mortem funds, which had already gone after the band. I'm going to describe due to the fact that the appropriate video disappeared after the scandal from the Network, an example of how a promotion run can support a peculiar candidate without mentioning his name.

We have a situation like this. Trzaskowski is opposed to lowering taxes (depending on who he is speaking to of course), while Mentzen is. And there goes the “profective” advertisement. Young Polish soldiers fight in the trenches of modern war. 1 of them screams there's no more ammo. The another 1 yells that there are no deliveries, due to the fact that the government has lowered taxes in this connection, there is no money for bullets. The erstwhile exclaims that he did not vote for specified a government, what the second says – exactly. And he shoots his fingers at the enemy, simulating the sound of gunshots with his mouth (pju-pju).

It's like a probie, but you know who's got no bullets.

The second way is to advertise directly, from abroad. And here was an interesting number, due to the fact that the guys got caught in their own traps. The game was on the Romanian variant to leave itself on the shelf the chance to challenge the adverse result of the election, utilizing an external (Russian) argument trained in Romania, meaning the impact on the campaign. NASK, a public institution badly involved, communicatethat he recorded commercials commissioned from outside the country, suggested that Putin, who were to affect 3 candidates. As the scandal went on, everything turned out the another way round: yes, there were advertisements from abroad, but not actually advertising just financially conquered posts, it was done from Vienna utilizing a foundation run by the erstwhile chief of competition against Orban at the time, while the Polish thread led to the Polish foundation with evident connections with Trzaskowski and Platform.

Yes, 3 candidates were active in the advertising, but – what was not said – Mentzen and Nawrocki were attacked, while Trzaskowski was supported. It's like NASK said of individual who was beaten by 7 thugs that he was in a fight involving 8 people. The main concern is that NASK, who on the committee of parliament could not explain the legitimacy of his earlier statements, but besides the deficiency of consequence of both media to this scandal (God, that the Law and Justice should do so, would be after Nawrock), but besides complete silence of the services and the prosecution. And it should be added that this is the NASK that is liable for protecting the network from disinformation, while being its source, will besides be NASK shortly – if it wins the Trzask and signs the law blocked by Duda and the Constitutional Tribunal's view – liable for tracking down and pointing out the prosecution for convictions for the alleged "talk of hatred", which is explained to be specified an office of state censorship. So let us know in what hands freedom of speech goes in Poland.

And here comes Tusk...

The final accent showing the complete political-medial-service countertop is the affair that was expected to yet put Nawrocki on the end of the campaign, that is, the issue of the candidate's sutenerity. Just look at the order of events. Tusk, about a week ago, lets a rat out that there's going to be any compromoma on Nawrocki and they'll be out in a couple of days. In a couple of days, there is an abomination in Oneta that there are anonymous witnesses that Nawrocki was driving (unlike an orgasm?) a prostitute in a hotel where he was a bodyguard. So the fugitive is that the Prime Minister announces the future press release, which means he knows what Onet is working on, what is disgrace and psychic, and the Prime Minister. The only mystery is who started it? Did Onet kindly inform the Prime Minister (something like the owner of Rzeczpospolita, Hajdarowicz under the dumpster erstwhile he told the Tuskom that there was a material about a troll on a Smolensk plane), or Tusk ordered specified a miracle in Oneta. Tertium non datur.

Not only did Tusk put Onet in a hard situation, he inactive went to Polsat with his own receipts (where, it was not asked) that there was no anonymous witness there to say anything, but there is simply a man of blood and bone to confirm it. It turned out to be a gangus, a pathological liar and a monster from the Gdańsk underworld (and these Gdańsk commercials!), the last individual to be relied on. erstwhile asked why specified large scrolls did not come out during the repeated checking of Nawrocki, besides by the services of Tusk's government, he replied that Apparently the service missed it.

He hit... the servants. Not only by undermining their competence, but not by explaining that they had reached these revelations by chance just a fewer days before the end of the campaign. They besides spoke to Onet the creators of this pashquil, saying that the Prime Minister was delirious due to the evidence of his informant, that Nawrocki was working for the sutener at the time (Mr. Bu, as the Prime Minister expressed him), who was 16 at the time, and that they would have been idiots if they had based their revelations on the premier origin of information. So everything fell apart, but the curtains fell.

There's been quite a few talk about Tusk joining the campaign. The boys in the staff seemingly lacked vigor despite suggestions for propelling its members with substances. I was surprised. After all, the full strategy of the 2 run camps was based on common attempts to stick (this is PiS) Trzaskowski to the regulation of Tusk, who clearly and dramatically lost in the polls, as the boys from Trzask promoted a candidate for a stand-alone entity, who dealt with everything himself, and the government's failures – if any – went to the account... The PiS, which not only bankrupted the country, left behind a camouflaged but scattered network of urinal saboteurs. So the PiS pulled Tusk out, and the Trzaski hid him.

And all of a sudden, it'll turn on. If it's known that he's not gonna face due to the fact that it's bad for the Thrushes, how does it turn on? Ano – Compromises procured by the service. Well, who found out that any gangus had any revelations about Nawrock? It is not the journalists of Onetu, due to the fact that they questioned it, even as to the reliability of the source. Tusk talked to him? Oh, no. He most likely went in there with a fuse, showed the hooks to the bastard, and this 1 sang everything that was written before the meeting. And specified numbers, especially in the Gdańsk playhole, where gang services supply different services to each another are the everyday reality of our reality.

Things like publishing notarial acts, statements from Nawrocki's bank transfers are all rhymes. No organization outside the participating parties may have access to specified documents. And it is neither a candidate nor a minister nor a prime minister. The only way out of the bank is to get the services. The question is, did they get it legally or illegally? In both cases, the answer would be highly interesting. In the case of legal – we would request to analyse who requested this and on the basis of what grounds. In the case of illegalism, where did officials come into possession of specified materials? But that's a question not for this election and not for this media.

So you can see driving around a band, no shame. And the deficiency of answers to the alleged public opinion will only cheer the guys up.

To Romania

It is besides crucial not to have a systemic, but to have a close-up look at the Polish campaign. It is the case of Romania, which is 1 phase ahead. Thus, we can draw informative examples of the future in our case. That there they canceled the elections on the basis of thin and secret reports of on-going influences on the election process – we had a akin effort in Poland (video scandal with NASK). The fact that our services were asking Romanians not about what the onus attack looked like (whose note was evidently not in Romania), but how they “settled” the exclusion of the incorrect candidate, is besides a pixie, due to the fact that the sutner number, made clearly in the face of the panic of the results of the first round, exploded in dirty paws. But there's a much more crucial conclusion.

This is the strategy of the Romanian mainstream, and it turned out that the winning one, or alternatively what they said before the elections and what they did after winning the elections. Well, the Romanians handled the substance in a professional and multilayered way. Firstly, they forced Romanian Hungarians against an anti-systemic candidate, conquering his nationalism as hostile to minorities. With us, this number will not pass, even as Trzaskowski promises the Silesians their language – the election bread will not be out of it. An interesting step, besides the winner, was the mobilisation of the abroad electorate in Romania. With us, the elections will be for a razor and a sharp increase in Polonia registration in this circular can be observed. This could be the straw that breaks the neck of 1 of our camels. How will Polonia vote? This 1 is mostly anti-left in the US. European – powder powder. Or will there besides be a turnout increase, which, as in Poland, 2023 completely changed the number to the left hand side?

However, 2 threads are most important. In Romania, until the end, all candidates vowed that no refugees would accept. They laughed at specified suggestions, as we did at our place, at our mouths completely. On the mouth, due to the fact that it was done at the same time as German police cars were driving unwanted "waste" of their own migration policy to the border. In Romania, too, any hints of censorship hanging over them were underestimated. In a week, yes, in a week, after winning the election, the borders were opened and the censorship of “hate speech” was introduced in covert terms, so that the fact of this election could not be publicized or commented on.

The same was actual for us – how to follow the way of this vowing and return to the different forms of dumping, whether our politicians or the Western press, it is evident that everyone is waiting only until the winning end of these elections, while the full agenda of hidden and displaced solutions is waiting in the drawer. I've written about it.: First – as in Romania, the drawbar of migrants and censorship will go, then – in bulk: catastry, partnerships, abortion law, country debt, Polish troops in Ukraine and... everything that Trzaskowski has denied so far. This is the science, and we will be able to test it only in the case of the fatal triumph of Trzaskovsky. And then with humility, though and joy, I will accept any proof that I was incorrect about this forecast of a replica of the Romanian script.

And yet – the only affirmative hero

After the election, we'll be swamped with memorial analyses of the presidential campaign. After all, we were again faced with "the most crucial elections in the 3rd Polish Republic", which proves that we have a strategy of a gibberish who fights for his zero-one state. And that state of instability seems to be... the only certain thing in the Brightest.

But we're going to have a rash of analyses as to how the final consequence came to pass, where many commentators will convince us that they knew from the beginning how it would end, although the consequence seemed uncertain to the end. So there will be descriptions of the phenomenon of the surge of debates, the final collapse of public television, the machination in relation to the electoral process performed by state institutions, “Join” Tusk utilizing service materials for the election run or the ferocious menzen beer. So what's left – we'll see.

But rather, there will be specified colored details, a mots voucher, or fun adventures. The run debate yet showed the mediocrity of the political level of the class in its dialog with the sovereign. But the sovereign was not besides demanding here, contenting himself with causative themes, emotions, yet the marshy level of charges, let alone programs. So the level is leveled and the horse with a row to the 1 who points out who started – politicians lowering the level, or a small demanding people?

For me, the sign of time expressed in the run will be... Zorro. It appeared on the roof at the Tarnów rally of candidate Trzaskovsky, developed the impressions of the banner and... disappeared. He became no longer a meme, but a myth, due to the fact that he was followed by the pursuit of the Polish state, which gave Zorro immediate national solidarity, and in the case of the state – this was another proof of his fall. But let's look at this story – isn't it a longing for fellow countrymen that individual from outside, faceless hero will come to this boring storm of the Polish village, which is simply a stiffened arrangement for a dud, stir and disappear. And waiting for him to come out of nowhere, fixing harm and punishing oppressors?

Yeah, possibly this Zorro guy is so longing to flip everything and start a fresh one. After all, fresh investigation has shown that most Poles hope for a fresh party. And the question is, what will happen to this hope after the elections, which have mostly established the fatalism of dual-repliencies?

Will Zorro always come to us and stay permanently? Is he just going to jump off the roof of the next run from time to time and leave, and we're going to be with that two-fielder, watched by Sergeant Garcia?

He wrote and read Jerzy Karwelis

All entries on my blog "The diary of the plague".