MEETINGS IN THE COALITION

stary-bob.blogspot.com 8 hours ago

Low ratings of the support of the coalition parties, the disastrous ratings of the Prime Minister and his government, and the failure of the surety of the KO for the president origin an increase in tension among the governing coalition. After a successful removal from the authority of the United Right and a large social credit of trust it seemed that the fresh power would begin, at least in part, to realize its pre-election promises. Unfortunately, there were difficulties, due to the fact that promises of any of the coalitions did not approve others and the projects of others did not like the first and alternatively of the expected changes there was a stagnation which caused a decline of support for the Prime Minister, his cabinet and almost all coalitions. I don't know why, but in Poland the most crucial thing is the organization interest. erstwhile creating specified a coalition, the Prime Minister should realize that, a democracy is not about authoritarian imposing its own will but about building an agreement and drawing up specified laws that will be accepted by all coalitionists.

The last example is the vote in the Sejm on amendments to the Act on Social Building Expenditure. 1 of the amendments was tabled by PL2050. Since they voted in favour, this amendment was supported by the Law and the Confederation. The another parties of the coalition were against it. There was a majority of this amendment passed. In my opinion, this is simply a sensible and beneficial amendment for people but not accepted by the "director". "If it was another minute of highlighting the distance to its own coalition from Poland 2050, I would say it is unwise" - stated D. Tusk. The conclusion is that since you're in the coalition, it's your work to vote by even the stupidest bill to gain the Prime Minister's approval.

I know that Tusk is "cut" to the Holovnia for the night gathering and will criticize any ideas presented by the PL2050 MPs. 1 of the wisest MPs PL2050 Katarzyna Pełczyńska-Nałęcz correctly diagnoses Trzaskowski's defeat and the deficiency of promised changes. "KO candidate for president supported by the Prime Minister lost the election. He lost especially to young people. After 10 years of Duda's rule. What does KO offer people? due to the fact that I propose to bring real changes: it was expected to be the TVP Act, so that it was public TV-no.It was expected to be a law on professional management of companies of the State Treasury, i.e. anti-cuvetov-no.Because the task of Poland 2050 was completely discontinued by the coalitions. There was expected to be a policy for local Poland, and again we have "privileged" for large people".

The proposals of MEP PL 2050 are unacceptable to another members of the coalition. TVP - Tusk propaganda tube. The Treasury companies are working for many "friends of the bunny" or representatives of another coalitions.

The deadline for government reconstruction is not yet known. Tusk has more time to "take out" a twelve MPs and keep the majority. The hoarding house, on the another hand, has the time to convince itself of the majority of its "own" MPs and to stay "a tongue in importance "in the coalition.