NATO's defence spending. Who spends the most and who spends the least?

NATO defence spending

In fresh years Defence expenditure have become 1 of the most crucial topics on the political agenda of many countries. Especially in the context of the changing global safety landscape, the emergence in geopolitical tensions and fresh threats, specified as cyber attacks or hybrid warfare, has taken on fresh importance in the financing of the army.

Organisation of the North Atlantic Treaty (NATO) plays a key function in ensuring safety and stableness in the Euro-Atlantic region. 1 of the main commitments of NATO associate States is to allocate a certain percent of their gross home product (GDP) to defence expenditure. The subject is simply a subject of quite a few emotion and debate – both in political circles and among the public.

Why 2% of GDP?

One of NATO's main goals is ensuring defence capacity of all associate States. In 2014, at the Wales Summit, it was agreed that each associate State should prosecute devoting at least 2% of its GDP to defence until 2024. This means that 2% of all goods and services produced in the country should be utilized to keep the armed forces. It was a consequence to expanding threats, specified as armed conflicts in the NATO neighbourhood or the improvement of military technologies in another parts of the world.

This amount was deemed to be minimum level of investment, which will let states to modernise the armed forces, acquisition modern equipment and keep combat capabilities. However, it is simply a major challenge for many countries to meet this requirement, especially in the face of budgetary constraints or competitive priorities specified as health, education or social policy.

Why does it matter?

The failure of any countries to meet the 2% of GDP request leads to tensions in NATO. Countries specified as the United States and Poland call for greater financial commitment, arguing that Europe's safety is simply a shared responsibility. They besides point to the request to share costs more reasonably in order to avoid overburdening any countries at the expense of others.

In fresh years we have seen growth trend in defence spending in many NATO countries. However, gathering the 2% of GDP mark is simply a long-term process that requires crucial investment. Due to the ongoing war in Ukraine and the expanding threats, there are voices that the 2% of GDP mark may be insufficient and that more defence spending will be needed.

Defence spending as % of GDP; development of interesting statistics.pl based on forecast NATO data

Who in NATO spends the least on defense?

Spain – 1.28% of GDP

Spain ranks at the end of the list in terms of defence spending. Despite the strategical position and expanding safety challenges in Europe, Madrid remains below the recommended 2% threshold.

Luxembourg – 1.29% of GDP

Despite advanced GDP per capita, Luxembourg spends small on defence. This is partially due to its tiny area and population, which reduces military needs.

Slovenia – 1.29% of GDP

Slovenia, like Luxembourg, does not spend much money on defence, although it gradually increases its spending on tensions in the region.

Belgium – 1,30% of GDP

Brussels, the office of NATO, spends 1.3% of its GDP on defence. This is 1 of the lowest values among economically advanced countries.

Canada – 1.37% of GDP

Canada, despite its size and function in global policy, remains below the recommended 2%, which raises criticism both at home and abroad.

Countries close to 2% of GDP

Many NATO countries are approaching the recommended minimum, and any have already reached it. Among them are:

Croatia (1.81%), Slovakia (2.00%) and Montenegro (2.02%) "These countries are gradually expanding their spending in consequence to rising tensions in east Europe.

Netherlands (2.05%) and France (2.06%) – These economies, although developed, only late reached the 2% threshold.

Turkey (2.09%) and Germany (2.12%) "Both countries are strategically crucial in NATO, which reflects their increasing commitment to security.

Who spends the most on defence as a percent of GDP?

Poland – 4.12% of GDP

Poland is definitely ahead of another NATO countries in terms of defence spending. In the context of the war in Ukraine and tensions in the region, Warsaw has chosen to intensively modernise the armed forces and increase the number of armies.

Estonia – 3.43% of GDP, Latvia – 3.15% of GDP, Lithuania – 2.85% of GDP

The Baltic countries are spending well above the 2% threshold, feeling a direct threat from Russia.

US – 3.38% of GDP

The United States, the world's largest economy and key player in NATO, spend more on defence than any another state in absolute numbers.

Greece – 3.08% of GDP

Greece has for years maintained advanced defence spending due to strained relations with Turkey and the request to defend its maritime borders.

How does interest and absolute spending reflect NATO's priorities?

Analysis of NATO's defence spending in 2024, both in percentages of GDP and in absolute terms, shows diversity of approaches to safety financing. The percent share of spending in GDP underlines the commitment of countries to their economical capacity, while amounts in millions of dollars reflect the actual scale of investment.

Some countries, specified as Poland and the Baltic States, spend more than 2% of GDP recommended, which combined with their comparatively large budgets in percent and absolute terms shows strategical defence priorities. On the another hand, the largest economies, specified as the US, Germany and the United Kingdom, spend immense sums, but their share of GDP frequently remains within the limits of NATO's recommendation.

These data together form a fuller image. The percent of GDP shows commitment to the size of the economy, and absolute values uncover the real budgetary power behind the defence. Together, the 2 indicators item how diverse the priorities and capabilities of the associate States are and at the same time show a common objective: ensuring safety within the Alliance.

NATO defence Expenditure: Analysis in Million Dollars

NATO states invest crucial amounts in defence, adapting their budgets to safety challenges.

Smallest defence budgets in NATO

Montenegro – USD 162 million

Montenegro, the smallest NATO associate in terms of population, spends a comparatively tiny amount on defence. This is due to limited military needs and a tiny state budget.

Macedonia – $353 million

Like Montenegro, Macedonia has a limited budget, which is reflected in defence spending.

Albania – USD 516 million

Although Albania is constantly expanding its defence spending, its budget remains 1 of the lowest in NATO.

NATO average defence expenditure

Countries with average budgets, ranging from $1 to $10 billion, include:

Latvia (US$1,421 million) and Estonia (1,437 million USD) "Despite the tiny economies, the Baltic countries allocate crucial amounts per capita, reflecting their priorities for safety in the region.

Portugal – $4,627 million "Although Portugal is outside the main areas of tension in Europe, it increases the budget for the modernisation of its armed forces.

Czech Republic – $6,834 million and Finland – 7 308 million USD – Both countries invest in the improvement of defence capabilities, responding to increasing geopolitical challenges.

NATO's biggest budgets

Poland – $34,975 million

Poland is ahead of most NATO countries, dynamically expanding spending on modernization of the army and strengthening defence in consequence to threats from Russia.

France – US$64 271 million

France, 1 of NATO's largest economies, maintains a advanced level of spending, allowing it to realise global military ambitions.

UK – 82 107 million USD

The British defence budget is 1 of the highest in NATO, which reflects its position as a global military player.

Germany – $97,686 million

Germany, the number 1 economy in Europe, is gradually expanding its defence spending, although their spending is inactive a percent distant from NATO's leading members.

US – $967,707 million

The United States remains NATO's leader in both full spending and global military influence. American Defence Budget represents almost twice the full expenditure of the another associate States. The United States remains by far the largest contributor in NATO. This underlines the key function of the US in ensuring transatlantic security.

Defense spending in millions of dollars of individual NATO states in 2024:

NATO spending in 2024, they show the differences resulting from their economical possible and safety priorities. Baltic countries and Poland focus on crucial investments in defence against their economies, while the largest budgets, specified as the US, Germany and the United Kingdom, make it possible to accomplish strategical global objectives. These differences show how different the needs and capabilities of NATO countries are in the context of shared security.

Although respective countries inactive do not scope the recommended 2%, others – like Poland or the Baltic countries – are well above this threshold, responding to threats in the region. This expenditure reflects not only economical opportunities but besides safety priorities and the geopolitical challenges facing individual countries.

Defence spending as a percent of GDP is simply a key indicator of NATO's commitment to ensuring common security. While achieving the 2% of GDP mark can be difficult, this is essential in the face of modern challenges specified as hybrid threats, cyber attacks or geopolitical tensions.

Image by freepik