Written by Tyler Durden
Written by Andrew Korybko via substack,
Opinions on who came out victorious with last Indian-Pakistan conflict, are divided, but 1 thing is certain, namely, that the fresh doctrine of India is simply a permanent conclusion.
By reports, India will treat all future acts of terrorism as acts of war on Pakistan, which consequence in cross-border attacks.
This may not deter Pakistan, whose military leadership is based on an unsolved conflict in Kashmir to legitimize its excessive influences, but may inactive make them think twice before organising future attacks.
Moreover, the Indus Water Treaty remains suspended despite a fragile ceasefire/"agreement" between them, which together contributes to a fresh reality in South Asia. Reports besides propose that Pakistan, alternatively than India, asked the United States to intervene diplomatically in the fresh conflict. India denied that any mediation took place despite U.S. claims, but the U.S. was likely to relay messages from Pakistan to India on behalf of Islamabad during talks between their officials.
CNN claims that Vance called Modi after receiving "alarm intelligence" which suggests that Pakistan told the US that he could usage atomic weapons in an act of desperation, possibly due to bombing many bases by India All over the country. If that were the case, it would mean that Pakistan thought it was losing, thus legitimizing the views that India had gained best. Finally, these impacts were not intercepted, which shows that India has achieved an escalation of dominance over Pakistan.
Although any Pakistani drones and rockets hit targets in India, the Russian S-400s were praised by national media For neutralizing many attacks coming. Similarly, the BrahMos supersonic projectiles produced together used in successful attacks by India on Pakistani bases, thus proving that Russian military equipment is truly 1 of the best in the world. In turn, Pakistani equipment, mostly Chinese, did not meet the excessive expectations of any observers, which negatively affects both sides.
Nevertheless, many members alt-media community – including any leading "non-Russian pro-Russian" – insists that Pakistan defeated India, although there are reasons to fishy that in reality they do not believe it, but are guided by hidden motives, claiming otherwise. Most of the same characters are known for their support for Palestine and/or China, and given that India is close to Israel and quarreled with China, supporting Pakistan is "ideologically consistent" with their views and excludes accusations of hypocrisy.
No substance how credible their approach to Ukraine, Palestine and anything else is, their views on the fresh Indian-Pakistan conflict should be treated with a large dose of salt. This should be remembered due to the fact that Putin and Modi "stressed the request for an uncompromising fight against terrorism in all its forms" during a conversation in Last week, which is not reflected in those leading "non-Russian pro-Russian" who present themselves as interpreters of Russian abroad policy.
Their support for Pakistan at the expense of India is against Russia's interests.
In conclusion, while opinions on who came out victorious from the fresh Indian-Pakistan conflict, India most likely won, considering how they punished Pakistan for terrorist attack on Pahalgam By bombing many bases, the treaty on Indus waters remains suspended and the fresh military doctrine has entered into force. Pakistan has not achieved comparable results despite the assurances of its supporters. Even if Pakistan has lost, it may not have learned from this, so it is not possible to regulation out the recurrence of future war.
