I watched the debate.
First of all, as there is simply a debate between 2 leading polls at 20, it is expected to be, not a debate-ass at 21st between six candidates, among whom there was no Zandberg or Braun.
Secondly, prima, journalists are not suitable for specified debates, and secondly, prima, politicians taking part in specified a debate are all poorly presented.
The only sensible question was that Nawrock was asked by Holovnia: "Who is the president of Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Finland?". The guy didn't know, and this is simply a disgrace (not the first!) of a presidential candidate. Neither do I, but I'm not running.
If I were a journalist, I would ask the following questions:
- Are we able to build a modern economy with a level of mathematics and physics at the advanced school level in PRL, or in China or Korea? If you think not, how do you change the situation?
- By spending 8 times little on R & D than South Korea, will we be able to scope this country, or will this distance increase?
- What can we do to get our 2 best universities from places in the 5th 100 to the first hundred, or at least to the third, where is Charles University in Prague?
- 60% of Poles read no books. What can we do to change that?
I could go on like this, but it's late...
Michał Leszczyński
