After visiting Moscow for 3 days, Xi Jinping said goodbye to Vladimir Putin: “There are now changes that have not occurred in 100 years. Together we drive these changes.” So it's worth trying to answer what Xi meant...
Most of us most likely figure it's the end of Pax American. Let's start by trying to answer the question, what was U.S. hegemony? We have no uncertainty that, in most cases, Western governments do not represent the interests of societies. It is actual that the current democracy blames the incorrect choice of citizens, but I think we are all well aware that the will of society is not the origin of power. The public is doing what the ubiquitous media suggest. In addition, the educational coercion strategy takes children distant from their parents and virtually prevents them from raising to an degree that makes young people immune to the influence of these media.
As a result, we get a stupid society that does and thinks precisely as the government wishes. Or, as the owners of large banks and corporations wish, due to the fact that they actually regulation the world. At least the planet of the West. But if that's the case, why aren't we talking about the hegemony of Western banks and corporations, just the hegemony of the US? After all, banks and corporations are more than national in nature. I think an even better question would be how it happened that banks and corporations gained more power than national states. How has it become that in the Western world, governments of individual states are most frequently puppets in the hands of transnational emanation banks and large corporations? At this point I must inform you that the views presented here do not have a certificate of 100% veracity, but nowadays it is hard to get specified a certificate.
The Power of Banks
In my opinion, the origin of the gigantic power of banks and corporations is the partial reserve. In short – the ability to make empty money. This is not the place to accurately describe the past of this practice, but it is appropriate to briefly say a fewer words about it. As we all know, the thought of gathering luck shorthands, so to speak, consumed the minds of many people. Not everyone has the talent to make money, and almost everyone would like to have as many as possible. They utilized to do alchemic art, and present they play totollot. But it was the bankers who managed to discover a way to "magical" the reproduction of money.
The essence of this thought was to replace gold or silver money with a paper certificate issued by the bank. It turned out very rapidly that with an ounce of gold in the vault, you can freely issue certificates for 5 or even 10 ounces. I don't gotta say that bankers of these certificates, they didn't throw them on the street, they traded them for real goods. An effort was made to argue this in the mid-19th century due to the fact that it is nothing more than fraud and theft, unfortunately the strong association of thrones with bankers torpedoed the suppression of these practices. The power of bankers, built on unfairly enlarged assets, grew. It is not known precisely where and erstwhile the thought of creating a global government arose, but since we are talking about deposing America and recalling the processes of centralizing the planet that closed only a fewer years ago... Book Francis FukuyamaEnd of story, the fast integration of the European Union, the creation of an American and Asian Union, the effort to marginalise national states, the creation of transnational institutions specified as the WHO and the planet Bank, we must admit that this project, even though it was scheduled for over 100 years, has almost succeeded.
The plan was to take control of the state, which has the best chance of winning a rivalry for hegemony. most likely wasn't easy to decide. By the end of the 19th century, Britain was the hegemon. The apparent question is: why didn't the bankers just take control of the British? Or why could they not take control of all the empires of that time and by negotiations and talks they did not lead to the creation of a planet government? In the late 19th century, almost all European state had a central bank. So there was quite a few control over politics. Only the United States resisted attempts to install the Central Bank throughout the 19th century. The united states, with the mouths of their founding fathers, expressed very critically about the banking of the partial reserve, seeing in it and in the people who dealt with it a large threat.
The answer is beautiful brutal. As the most effective tool for making changes, it was decided to usage war. In a word – trauma. This active creating conflict, escalating it, blowing up and financing both parties. And in a situation where everyone was sick and tired of fighting, blood, destruction, peace was introduced, with a pack of mandatory changes, telling people that it was the old order that led to the barbarism of war. British historian Antony Sutton, in his books he acknowledges that this method was a applicable application of the Hegel dialectic process. Thesis-antithesis-synthesis. Conflict and resolution. Diabolical method in its immorality. Unfortunately, it's effective. However, she had any limitations. To finance both sides of the conflict, we had to have an efficient tool for this.
Unfortunately, the bankers, developing their money creation skills from nothing, were able to finance expanding wars. The 2 planet wars and the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia were processes that paved the way for the U.S. hegemony. The period of the Cold War was, according to Anton Sutton, only a theatre in which 2 works controlled by bankers stood other each other. "Free West" and east "Evil Empire". The intent of this theatre was to scare Western societies with a imagination of atomic war and thus justify gigantic arms spending that no 1 would agree to during a period of peace.
How is the strategy of controlling and robbing the planet called Pax Americana constructed? The primary strategy of the United States is to keep wars and conflicts on the planet Island, a supercontinent consisting of Asia, Europe and Africa.
The wars that America is causing are depleting the world's island, dividing it. They origin a capital outflow that seeks safe places for investment. America, separated from the restless Eurasia by oceans, seems to be the perfect place to invest. Wars and conflicts on the world's island, in addition to the outflow of capital, besides origin the most talented people who instinctively choose the US to emigrate. In this way, the United States has excellent conditions for dynamic and safe development. In the current opinion, advanced standards of surviving in the US are identified with the integrity of the American state. In fact, this fact is simply a consequence of robbing the remainder of the planet of goods and intellectual capital.
During the 1944 Bretton Woods conference, the Americans a week after landing on the beaches of Normandy forced most of the planet to accept the fact that the dollar would be the world's main reserve and settlement currency. To make this proposal “unrejectable”, as Don Vito Corleone called it, be easier digestible, a dollar in global transactions is to be exchanged for gold. In words, utilizing it as a reserve currency and money to settle in global trade seemed safe.
After the end of planet War II, defeated empires specified as Germany and Japan realized what had happened. Among the states aware of the cunning play of Wall Street bankers was, in my opinion, France. And it was the French who dared to see if the American dollar was actually interchangeable for gold. In the late 1960 ’ s, they sent a large amount of banknotes to the Americans, waiting to be traded for gold. The Americans exchanged them for gold, but realizing the increasing power of Japan and Germany, and consequently the expanding imports, understood that keeping the dollar exchange for gold was very risky.
Dollar oil
In 1971, the dollar for gold was yet broken. Since then, she has been replaced by the work to buy oil for dollars. That's why it's called petrodollar. The United States with a powerful apparatus of coercion concluded a contract with the Sauds, a household in Saudi Arabia, that as the largest oil maker in the planet they would sale it exclusively for dollars. Any effort to change this situation ended in the future with an invasion of the U.S. armed forces into an incorruptible country under the pretext of deficiency of democracy or production of weapons of mass destruction.
It is worth repeating at this point that the intent of the US strategy was to keep the countries of the world's island in a state of economical underdevelopment, so that the united and rich Eurasia would not release the shackles of the American occupation. Despite their efforts, the Americans failed to halt the industrial improvement of Japan and Germany. In the late 1980s, the United States pacified their increasing aspirations. In 1989, president Deutsche Bank was murdered, Alfred Herrhausen. The policy he pursued, not only was it aimed at the improvement of the German industry, but it besides assumed the expansion of German corporations to the wider waters of the global financier. The president of the DB criticized Wall Street policy that destroyed Africa and another 3rd planet countries. He spoke in various global bodies calling for a change of approach to these countries and to cancel the gigantic debt, which has become a large ball to the mediocre economies. After Herrhausen was killed, the main bank managers were listed on the Anglo-Saxons. Germany was slow switched from the dynamic improvement way they were on to the track leading to the seemingly equally spectacular success of German unification and real leadership in the European Union.
Many commentators present consider Germany's political success as centuries old, not seeing it as a truly neat trap. This is rather good erstwhile we compare the ethos of the German state in the late 1980s and now. Then being German was something. The German state enjoyed the highest prestige among all countries of the world. And this despite the gigantic stigmatism of planet War II for the Germans.
Today German youth listens to Turkish rap. Germany's society was mixed with different waves of emigration, and after the dynamics of the 1980s there was only a shadow. The German economy, erstwhile driven by the well-functioning Deutsche Bank and the best currency in the planet – the real German Wunderwaffe – is simply a brand, present slow falling in the darkness of the recession. Helmut Kohl erstwhile asked how he would persuade the Germans to vote in the accession referendum to enter the euro area to abandon their beloved brand, he replied: "It's easy, I won't make a referendum". In this way Germany is the only EU country in which the euro area accession referendum has not been held.
The second worrying, increasing economy was Japan. Well organized in the structure of household financial and economical cartels called zaibatsu, it developed highly dynamically. The nipponese lost their confidence. The Fed carried out a well-organised attack on them utilizing derivatives, stock options, by which companies could bet growth or decline, or full countries. Simplifying all the nuances, the Fed set up with the nipponese about how dynamically Japan will develop. Of course, preparing the log before it will be thrown under the Japanese's feet to slow its development. The log wasn't big, but it caused the bet to lose. And the amounts they were betting on were gigantic. The nipponese say the losses incurred as a consequence of this trap were greater than those suffered by Japan as a consequence of planet War II. Personally, I think it's besides much. The fact is that since then Japan has had a giant toeball in the form of debt of 250% of GDP. This debt is mainly internal, resulting from the structure of the economy built from zaibatsu. But that doesn't make it any better.
China on the horizon
The circulation of the spines of Germany and Japan took place at a time erstwhile China led Deng Xiaopinga They're taking it slowly. Lee Kuan Yew, Outstanding politician, father – founder of Singapore was mentor of Deng. possibly it is to him that China owes the tactics the Chinese leader has taken so as not to divide the destiny of Germany and Japan on the way of development. Deng's political will was the doctrine of 24 characters: observe coolly and calmly, safe positions, gain confidence, hide your own capabilities, wait for your time, not going out from the ranks; not lifting your head, demanding leadership. China, in the camouflage of a communist pier empathizing with ideology, has embarked on the way of dynamic modernization, the effects of which we see present in all its glory. Neither Germany nor Japan were able to grow adequate to throw a Wall Street glove and effort to fight for the removal of slave shackles from the planet Island. The Chinese have succeeded.
The strategy of stopping wars and conflicts on the Eurasian continent, as I wrote, is simply a fundamental substance for maintaining American hegemony. Zbigniew Brzeziński wrote that erstwhile it comes to the alliance of China, Russia and Iran, it will be the end of the U.S. hegemony. Today, in addition, Chinese diplomacy has led to diplomatic relations between Saudi Arabia, a late major ally of the US, and Iran, a country so far recognised as an crucial point of the alleged axis of evil. The processes unifying the planet Island are definitely stronger than the attempts to set fire to it, which are inactive being undertaken by Wall Street. Beijing's diplomacy has been intensively lobbying for over a year to address the Palestinian issue. And Chinese sympathy is definitely on the Palestinian side. Inspired by the UN Council last year, which was the year of the war in Ukraine, the most condemning resolutions were issued against Israel and its anti-Palestinian policies.
I did not accidentally start this text by indicating that the main tool for maintaining U.S. hegemony is dollar. It is to be expected that the main conflict for hegemony will be the conflict for money. A group was formed in 2011 BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South AfricaFrom the very beginning, it has put itself as the most crucial task of undermining the monetary strategy built on a dollar. The background of the BRICS constitution was the alleged arabian Spring, which resulted, among another things, in the execution of Muammar Gaddafi, who tried to undermine the dollar's position as a clearing currency in oil trade. A decade ago, the U.S. was punishing specified rebels with harshness. Today, Saudi Arabia's conduct, which is ostentatiously playing the Americans on its nose, escapes.
Falling hegemon
Let us now ask the fundamental question: what strategy has the fallen hegemon adopted today? Globalization understood as a free movement of goods and services was initially intended to pave the way for a planet government. Since the planet has become 1 large village, it must be managed centrally for the common good. Yes, to defend the planet from possible extremists that could teardrop down this icy. Of course, the globalization agenda is simply a wolf with sheep's skin, which I don't gotta tell you. The free movement of goods and services is simply a value, but the already de-liberal order, which de facto means de-liberal panic and intolerance for anyone who has any another thought of a collective life device, is nothing good. He described this phenomenon well John Mearsheimer in the book Great Imagination. Demoliberism does not take prisoners, does not negotiate. He demands absolute submission. For it is nothing more than to probe under planet government and planet murderism. Topped with the thought of empty money printers. A planet with no way out, no way out. A monopolized, controlled by the outlaw elite of “spoons”. If this elite were able to make an elixir of immortality or even longevity, we would get an image of anti-utopia, which seems to have small to do with how God imagined the world.
To the horror (I believe) of bankers, globalisation began to service China's growth – the world's main factory. In general, China managed to bypass the snares placed on them and additionally, utilizing various types of camouflage, strengthen adequate to become a real threat. I'll say more: they've become so powerful that maintaining U.S. hegemony is now virtually impossible. The variant of atomic demolition of the planet is hard to treat as a triumph in the war to keep hegemony.
So what tactics could at least buy the Americans any time? erstwhile I speculated on my channel a fewer years ago about possible scenarios of the war on hegemony, the script of the fresh Cold War came to head very naturally. If we want to halt China's economical expansion and their satellites, we must physically shield ourselves from them to do so we request fear. What causes fear? War. due to the fact that war carries dehumanization. Thus, respective conflicts at the borders between the West and the East. It's best that these are conflicts that the media will pass on. And then frost them and decision on to the arms, hatred, and above all break the supply chains.
A fewer years ago, it occurred to them that a akin effect could have been achieved through a global pandemic. But that variant didn't work. It didn't work. The Chinese didn't get stuck on a mine. In the first act they played according to the script, but then they pulled the West's bad number. It's not always working out. For us, it is simply a lesson that not all scenarios are going according to plans. Life is full of unpredictable variables and specified failures are normal. You should be able to improvise. And I don't think that skill is simply a globalist asset, Wall Street, or whatever they call it. War, then. But where? Ukraine, mediate East, Taiwan, or Korea? How about Central Asia and Afghanistan?
Of course, preferably anywhere at once. At the beginning of the war, Ukraine was full of conjectures that an open period for wars would open a can of Pandora. China will take advantage of the opportunity, they will attack Taiwan, Israel against Iran, and the Koreans will jump to their throats. Fortunately, nothing like that happened. The conflict in Ukraine did not accomplish the degree of escalation that could lead to a level of hatred that would in turn justify entering the Cold War phase. The mediate East was late disarmed by Chinese diplomacy, which led to the resumption of diplomatic relations between Saudis and Iran. In Taiwan, Kuomintang won in the local elections, a organization far little pro-American than the ruling team, showing social sentiments, and the Chinese themselves are absolutely not eager to aid Americans set fire to the world. In Korea, too, there is no conflict.
Of course, the bankers evidence any insignificant successes. In Pakistan, the Americans led to the democratically elected president Imran Khan being dismissed, replacing him with a pro-American military junta... Ah, those loving democracy Americans. In the Czech Republic, the presidential election was won by the pro-American military... but even he does not burn to war. On the another hand, China's diplomatic offensive takes on more places on the planet map. The Chinese win in the economical field. They're in a constant offensive in the war for money.
Almost all of Asia declares its desire to decision distant from the dollar in abroad trade. Most importantly, the Chinese doctrine of creating a fresh safety architecture in the planet has begun to prevail. It is called the Global safety Initiative. It is worth noting here that ideology is the most powerful instrument of empires. It is adequate to look at Wall Street, which began with the right to self-determination, democracy and human rights on the banners. But leftist ideologies were utilized to destruct and disorganize opponents.
First they were socialisms, communism, and now LGBT, the fight against global warming and akin ideologies. Note that these are not tanks, not aircraft carriers, but ideologies are more effective than military arsenals. If the armed forces are going to kill the enemy, then all these false ideologies have led to a situation where we have ceased to reproduce. And shooting at us is simply a waste of energy. Just sit down and watch the next generations swim in hedonism and avoid starting families. If individual wanted to exterminate us, us – white Europeans, or wider – people civilized, it was done with ideology. First he destroyed our old, good ideology built on the foundation of Christianity, and then in place of the old, he implemented his fake, leading to a demographic disaster. But not just demographic. We have been deprived of spirituality.
China enters the function of an East sage, a mandarin with an olive branch offering fresh safety architecture. It is based on respective principles. In respecting the Charter of the United Nations, respecting the territorial integrity of states, resolving conflicts through diplomacy, not interfering in the interior affairs of states, and respecting the rule that state power is irrelevant in disputes. In a word, equality between state entities and global law.
Doesn't sound spectacular. I have the impression that the Chinese left out the PR and advertising department erstwhile they formulated the above rules, but whatever. The planet proposed by China will surely have much more chances of being a planet of peace and prosperity than the 1 built by Wall Street. Besides, the rule of non-interference in the interior affairs of states will give a chance to free ourselves from all the harmful and in its essence profoundly anti-human ideologies that destruct our Western world. The Western media, in fact, effort to present Pax Sinic as a full enslavement, and most late in our Polish information bubble the full wide and very interesting Chinese proposal comes down to the concept of Russian miru, so that it can scare children.
In the information war, the West is functional. Only that described by Western, and especially Polish, propaganda tubes clearly ceases to fit what you can see erstwhile you look out the proverbial window. There is no uncertainty that the planet is at a turn. There is no uncertainty that in 10 years, the planet will be different. I personally have no uncertainty he'll just be better. I have no uncertainty that the order created by widely understood paternalism will be better than the order created by thieves and bandits, which I consider to be the owners of global banks and corporations.
From our perspective, it is most crucial that Poland seizes as many opportunities as possible, which now appear before it; that it does not lose everything that can be lost. We have a historical chance to build a state that will exploit our considerable economic, civilizational and intellectual potential. Even though we are said to be rather cool, hardworking and creative people, unfortunately we are ruled by immoral bastards. And I think we should start by changing this fact on the threshold of the fresh era that humanity is entering.
Sebastian Pitoń
photo. public domain
Think Poland, No. 15-16 (9-16.04.201023)
