General remark (and 3 in total). First of all, the text was originally entitled “We request to talk about Polish pollers”, but then it grew to different sides and the title did not fit very much (although there will be quite a few pollers). Secondly, this "last bell" does not mention to the upcoming second round, but to the close future. Thirdly, there will be very small optimism in this note (You have been warned). So much for admission.
Now, before we start grappling about the election results, I'm gonna take a fast journey down the memory lane. A long time ago, erstwhile I was much younger, I studied sociology. At 1 of the courses (which I have most likely already mentioned many times as part of the polling process), we got to read the text devoted to polling. The conclusion of the text was that we should not propose ourselves by polls, due to the fact that they survey what is happening, well, at the minute they are being conducted. So it may be that any poller will do his research, let's say on Friday, and on Saturday people will have a completely different opinion on the subject being investigated.
In this text, there was a somewhat comic thesis that with these polls it is that they are usually treated as butt-guards for the CEO, at the minute erstwhile it turns out that any decision went wrong. due to the fact that if specified a CEO makes a bad decision and individual wants to settle it for it (and individual will definitely want to), then specified a CEO then pulls out a full wagon of polls and shows that he based his decision on available information/etc.
Now, let's go back to the Picnic's past. These present times look like wherever and whenever any poll will appear, in which candidate X will have a highest of support, the environment from which candidate X is derived, the same poll will put on its SMs and will begin to brag about it (obviously, at the same time convincing that it is their credit that this support is so high).
Let us add to this a tiny item specified as the fact that Polish pollers have a long history, ahem, fawyrodzacja various candidates and parties. For this reason, for a long time I have been looking at the polling average, due to the fact that she, unlike individual polls, can show any trend (even assuming poll X overestimate 1 politician and polling Y another). It was from the polling average, for example, that PiS would have problems in 2023.
But now it is 2025 and it turns out that the polling average can besides be inserted where PSL has: women's rights, housing situation in Poland, rights of elgiebets/etc. Take 1 like Braun. The election score was better than any poll. individual may say “maybe people were ashamed”, but if they were, then not everyone and not always, due to the fact that 5% with a hook happened to him. Same with Mentzen. While there was an increase in support in Braun's fresh polls (but again, 6% of him was not watching in any), Mentzen's poll support was falling. Or Karol Nawrocki, who around 30% of the poll pole was very rare. And even if he was there, Rafał Trzaskowski always had a safe 5-6% advantage over him.
You know, this is where people start believing in conspiracy theories. due to the fact that how is it possible that according to the polling average the right should have 8%-10% lower support in the election (pi times the eye)? Okay, I get it, you just screw up the poll. But you can (as I wrote a fewer times) make this survey deliberately, "a product according to order." At specified a point, it would be very easy to conclude that either all pollers screwed up (and that virtually all of them, due to the fact that even the American poller gave Nawrock triumph (by 0.3 pp, however), but there Mentzen had 12.7pp, and Braun was not considered at all.
So all the pollers were wrong? individual might say, “Well, possibly the respondents were ashamed to call who they were voting for?” Excuse me, but I find this argument amusing. It turns out that individual wants, for example, Braun to be president of Poland, but is ashamed to admit that he is voting for him. In addition, all now and then, polls appeared, indicating that for example Braun had 5%. Like what? erstwhile they're embarrassed, erstwhile they're not? All right, possibly it was a deliberate act. There's even little sense in this explanation. How would that work? Any mythical “they” reached all pollers and told them to change the poll results? To what end?
All right, so since it wasn't about a conspiracy or a storyteller, what actually happened? I bet it might have been a small different kind of fuck. I'm talking about attendance. Until any point of advanced attendance, he was afraid of the PiS. I remember perfectly how, in the course of the 2019 European Parliament elections (which the PiS won) erstwhile the first attendance data came down, 1 of the close PiSów polling specialists almost broke down due to the fact that his forecasts were different. And then it turns out that PiS's higher turnout didn't hurt. It didn't hurt him until 2023, due to the fact that it turned out that (let me simplify now) PiSowskie regions have given up, and antiPiSowskie has served.
In my opinion, there is no point in comparing attendance with 2025 with 2020. A much better image will be obtained erstwhile we compare the turnout from the first circular with the 1 we faced in 2023 (just to explain why). Turnout in 2023 amounted to 74.38% of the right to vote, last Sunday 67.31% of the right to vote went to the polls. Now, let's look at how voters voted in the 18-29 age category. In 2023 it looked like this: KO 28.3%, fresh Left 17.7%, 3rd Road: 16.9%. Confa 16.9%, PiS 14.9%. Turnout in this age category was 68.8% at the time. What about Sunday? Mentzen: 36.1%, Zandberg 19.7%, Trzaskowski 12.2%, Karol Nawrocki 10%, Biejat and Braun after 5.1% and Hołownia 4%. Interestingly, attendance in this age category was higher than that "general" due to the fact that it was 72.8%
Before we discuss these results, I will explain why, in my opinion, it is better to compare the results of the elections with those of 2 years ago than those of five. In fact, at first glance, it is better to compare presidential elections to presidential elections, but at second glance (quoting 1 of the characters of my favourite movie "Smolensk") "it is not simple, even the opposite". In order not to prolong, it has been so long since 2020 that almost half of this age category has jumped to another. The chronicle work to mention that I saw superb editorials that compared Trzaskowski's score in this age category to Komorowski's result. The fact that it's been 10 years since then and they're all different people, superb editorials are missing. We'll have a much better look erstwhile we dig up 2023, due to the fact that it's been a small over 1.5 years since the election. So to a large degree we are dealing with the same people who in 2023 helped to win the election of the current ruling coalition.
With the bare eye you can see that the least in the youngest electorate lost the PiS, and most parties participating in the coalition. This "electorate" failure of the ruling coalition will be crucial for our consideration. Given the turnout and the fact that it has been this year and a half since that election, only 1 conclusion can be reached. The same people who voted for the coalition at the time – now they were in favour of Mentzen and Zandberg.
I looked forward to the eruption of wisdom and the translation that young people are stupid and that they do not know what they are doing. With these young people, it is that they always vote “for us”, they are smart and good, but erstwhile they vote for “the ones”, they abruptly turn into a bunch of idiots who have turned their ass upside down from prosperity (I think it's a good time to mention that I erstwhile committed a wall of the text “And besides, I think it's crucial to talk to young people”, which I'm going to put in Sources). It was no different this time. Because, you know, these dumb bastards voted for Mentzen alternatively of Trzaskowski, but we give them a second turn. I must say, it's a far-reaching kindness. From myself, I would add that if I were a youth (I inactive remember how it is) and individual would run to me with specified a concluding message, I would thank him with the same slogan that conservatives resented right after the United Right tightened abortion law in 2020.
All right, but how did that beautiful and smart young man abruptly get so stupid and disgusting? (sorry, I had to). How is it possible that the same young people who voted for KO, TD and NL abruptly voted for Mentzen (by their way, Mentzen with Braun in this age category have a full of over 40%). Okay, but how did this happen? possibly it's about curving algorithms (though on Eloneks) that premium utmost right-wing content, but on the another hand – Zandberg someway managed to break through. Information bubbles in which we all sit – and again, Zandberg someway managed to break through to them. So possibly we should look elsewhere for causes?
Young people who voted like this in 2023, and not otherwise, voted in favour of change (status quo in the form of the United Right hand could not boast a very good result), which they were promised. And somehow, this promised change didn't happen.
But possibly the reason is simply a small different, and that is, for example, that the fresh power, at the time erstwhile it was in opposition, promised everyone everything after the bow, and then just didn't bring it back? possibly it is due to the fact that young people expected that fresh power (for a change) would have any dialog with them? By the way, I have a vague feeling that young people now had about the same feelings as older women in the 18-29 age category in 2007. We were promised a change then. The opposition from 2005-2007 drew attention to economical emigration (which, for the PiS variety, did not pay attention, due to the fact that it did not work for him), to the fact that the state on average works, and should work better and so on, and so on. And then it was fundamentally like this. The fact that in 2011 the PO managed to win the election for the second time, the Tuska organization mostly owes PiS, who had no idea. And then the reunion began (although slow at first, but it accelerated around the 2015 election campaigns). Now it's all the same, only even more, due to the fact that the full coalition went to elections with somewhat progressive promises (someone inactive remembers that before the Kosiniak-Kamish election he was a supporter of the partnership?), and then no of it was revealed. To be precise, it is not that only young people, euphemizing, discouraged the regulation of the current coalition, but someway it happened that in this age category it is very, very visible.
If I were to point out 1 main culprit and a brake, I would point to the PSL. Relationships? possibly so, but better with the notary, and if already in the USC, no 1 is to be happy (and again, even in the course of their governments), liberalisation of abortion law? No way. How about at least a coherent housing program? (Attention, there will be a capslock played), YES, BUT ONLY AND ONLY WHERE THE DEVELOPERS CAN DO IT. Fixing the church fund? That's what we're doing! I'm so old, I remember how the PSL made a beautiful sensible action about fat cats from the PiS that feed on the Treasury Companies. And you'll never guess what the same PSL did as shortly as he had the chance to get to the same SSP.
And I know you might be amazed by my surprise, but the last 1 just surprises me. If you are going to the election with the slogans that the SSP must be expelled from organization denominations, and then you push your organization denominations into the place of “the people”, then you push yourself into the cast, due to the fact that individual may draw attention to this slight inconsistency. It is thanks to this that the Confiers can tell their electorate that they “would not do so”. They would have done it without blinking, but now they can pretend otherwise and point out that everyone else is after any money.
Okay, let's halt here for a minute and think about what this fresh power is actually doing. I realize that any things cannot be done, due to the fact that Andrzej Duda will make certain that he cannot. Nevertheless, what would stand in the way of putting a law on his desk about partnerships? Right, Kosiniak-Kamish and his suicidal tendencies in politics. Of the 100 specifics, very small was realized, and the remainder was silenced. Yes, they handled TVP very nicely and the prosecution (which the United Right tried to concrete in 5 twelfths, and I think everyone is aware that they tried to do so so that people like Romanowski did not gotta ask for asylum from a stew dictator). Although there are no PiSowski standards on TVP anymore, there are "momentages" and nobody cares about independence/etc.
The settlements have moved, but if they are to be done correctly (not with the aid of folk tribunals), then all of this must proceed (and at the very end it will turn out that if the election is won by a certain Mr. Batyr, each 1 of them will be pardoned in glory and glory). But these accounts have a second face, which is the commissions. These committees, on the another hand, are acting as if the current power was not peculiarly afraid about this being professional. It reminds me of the committee on which Jake and Kaleta turned out to be clowns who don't know what the difference is between a witness and a suspect, which has this extra layer of shame that Kaleta has graduated with honors. With these accounts, it is beyond that even if everything (including committees) went as it should, it does not appear that it is adequate for people. And it is actual that I disagree with Adrian Zandberg, who told any time ago about the fact that the fresh power has a year (for the love of a nonexistent transcendent being, how does he imagine it? Courts of 24 hours for Matecki and Romanowski?), however, I agree that it would be appropriate to do something beyond these accounts.
The fresh power, there is no "great narrative", something for PiSowski 500+. The current power simply manages the country, that's all. For this to be a good management, but we have, for example, flowers specified as a simplification in the wellness contribution (which Duda vetoed) and parallel narratives that indicate that it's actually in wellness Protection from cholera money, so you can look for savings there. The previously mentioned shell in the subject of subsidies for developers is besides included in this. And it seems to me that it is not even a problem that the coalition is rather broad (from Kosiniak to Biejat), but that a large proportion of politicians of this coalition are mentally surviving in 2007, which is at the minute of our history, in which it may have seemed that the organization of Jarosław Kaczyński was about to go down. And even if it doesn't, the citizens have already “acquainted” and this organization will not pose any threat in the future.
In order to full realize the mindset of the large wins of 2007, 1 must besides bear in head that apart from PiSem, the only opposition was LiD (SLD+SDPL+PD+UP). due to the fact that the SLD with the buildings met after the defeat that was his regulation between 2001 and 2005 (fun fact, PSL, who co-ordinated at the time, it practically didn't hurt) and it was hard to anticipate that it would be the same SLD that unmercifully flogged the ruling coalition from 1997 to 2001. So it is not hard to guess why the ruling coalition was convinced that it would regulation until the end of the planet and 1 day longer. So, at least in part, 1 can realize why the rulers were not peculiarly afraid with the opinion of the sovereign (because who was this sovereign to vote for? On the PiS? Free jokes!) and they considered that erstwhile it comes to winning elections, they were finished.
This approach cannot be understood in any way after taking power in 2023. It was known that following this defeat, the 2025 presidential election would be a game for PiSu for everything. Although at the end of the parliamentary electoral campaign, right-wing societies were united for the heads, it was apparent that before the presidential elections they would close ranks regardless of interior tensions. It was besides known that they would do absolutely anything to win these elections, due to the fact that maintaining the Presidential Palace was crucial to them so that in 2027 they could fight for a return to power. I could keep listing all these apparent things, but I don't want to. The fact is that the current rulers had to know, and yet they acted as if they had nothing to fear, and the presidential election itself was a formality. And now this formality looks like 2 days before the election, we have no thought how this election ends.
The results of the first circular were rather a surprise. While Trzaskowski's score coincided (more or less) with what appeared in the polls (the same as Biejat and Zandberg's results), it was Mentzen, Braun and Nawrocki's results than cholera. All 3 of them were undervalued. And possibly it was a question of the right having a more motivated electorate, but if so, would it be appropriate to start taking into account the issue of attendance (in individual electorates) during the polling? The answer is, I don't know, I guess.
All right, now that we've reached the right, it's worth leaning over the election consequence of Grzegorz Braun and Sławomir Mentzen. As I mentioned earlier, in Braun's case, the closer the election was, the more support was given to him by the polls, it looked very different in Mentzen's case, due to the fact that his polling support gradually declined. Let's start with Braun. The fact that Braun has specified advanced support, in my humble opinion, shows that the state is completely incapable to cope with misinformation and this disinformation on any subject, due to the fact that Grzegorz Braun collects all possible conspiracy theories and then implements them into his "general explanation of everything." In gaining recognition, they aid Braun media, who, describing his exploits, act as if nothing was known about him. Okay, sometimes individual will compose that it's a pro-Russian politician, but since there's usually no item of individual who's a Braun fan, they might conclude that since there's no specified thing as a pro-Russian politician.
Attention! An article sponsored by Sovereign!
https://patronite.pl/Piknik-on-country-g%C5%82upoty
The popularity of the far right (i.e. in full extreme) is due to the fact that the United Right bends constantly after its narratives and postulates. This was very clearly seen during the pandemic, erstwhile at any point the outer wing of the United Right repeated about covid and vaccination the same nonsense that the Confies had previously told. The intention, of course, was to choice up oxygen from this utmost right, but in practice, it meant much more widespread anti-scientific theory, which resulted in a leap of support for parties and politicians who were consistent in their shurness.
What worries me is that, although the Law and Justice have lost support for both the 2020 and 2023 electoral results, it does not mean anything good, due to the fact that this support has been managed by Braun and Mentzen. For comparison, in 2020 Bosak received 6.78% of the vote. Now Braun and Mentzen got over 20%. I have already mentioned what is happening in the "youngest" age category and it does not look good.
If we are already at Mentzen, then it is worth leaning over the result. This is simply a immense success. Don't get me wrong, even if he only delivered 10%, it would be a success, due to the fact that in addition to him, Grzegorz Braun competed in this election. Even those 10% would be better than Bosak's score and from the 2023 conflict result. but alternatively of 10-12% Mentzen got 14.81% votes. In another words, “it is not good”. It's not good, and it could be much worse. It just so happens that at 1 point Mentzen had 22% of the support (it was the highest score, but others gave him, for example, 19%).
This means nothing little than that, although at the end of the run he was underestimated, he did not bring his highest support. And although this in itself should delight us, we are in a place where we gotta ask ourselves what would happen if we did. So, what would happen if, alternatively of Mentzen, the confederacy found individual who could argue with journalists and who wouldn't should be kept from them? What would happen if the confederate found individual who wasn't burdened with erstwhile actions and statements like Mentzen? What if the confederate had a better timing and the spades of support fell out at the time of her first circular of elections? The second circular would be, and it's not entirely clear whether a candidate like that would have come from the first place.
Worth mentioning is the fact that the common decision (understanded as opposition against the confederacy) in 2023 made the confederate in the polls fall (compared to polling peaks) 10 mesh down. This time it was little than 7 meshes with much higher support. And that's alarming due to the fact that it's not that this information (e.g. recalling earlier actions, statements) does not scope the confiant bubble. That's where it gets as far as possible, but more and more of the electorate doesn't care.
And that's why this note has a different title. It's bad now, but unfortunately, everything seems to be much worse. Although the script is rather real, that after the next parliamentary elections the PiS will regulation over the conflict (yes, I know, Sikorski said that it is impossible to exclude the coalition of the conflict with the PO, but in order for it to happen KO would gotta give more than it is ready to give the PiS to it now), it is crucial that if everything goes as it goes so far, then the script may be that the main quarterback in the coalition will not be Kaczyński and Mentzen. And to be honest, I don't truly like that perspective.
This script is real regardless of who wins the election. Although, to be honest, the way I see it is that for the conflict it would be better if Nawrocki lost the election, due to the fact that then in the PiS there could be post-election settlements (which did not happen in 2023, due to the fact that the next election was on the horizon) and there could be a smaller or larger split, and any of the politicians of the United Right to the conflict very close (for example, practically the full SuwPol). I dare say that Mentzen is secretly counting on specified a scenario, which has late had respective plays, which propose that he is either (unfortunately) developing himself as a politician, or (also unfortunately) has his advisers.
I mean the situation which occurred after a conversation with Trzaskowski, specifically after a celebrated beer. As shortly as the first photograph fell into the saucer (due to Sikorski), The United Right passed the feces incidental and began Mentzen to fling. He cut himself off and began to explain that it is not so that he must be in a coalition with PiSem and that he wants to build a “coaltic capacity”. due to the fact that in fact, if everyone knows that the Confisf is doomed to the Law and Justice, then the Law and Justice and this would have a profound impact on coalition negotiations. And it's not like I made it up due to the fact that Mentzen wrote it straight. The conclusion is that if elections go the way of the conflict and the organization finds itself in a situation where it can be a coalition for both PiSu and the Civic Coalition, then it is the conflict that will negociate from the position of force. due to the fact that her argument will always stay “if you do not give us this and this, they will give it to you”.
The above note is besides called the "last bell" due to the fact that even if the election turns out to be won by Trzaskowski and cannot be ruled out (for a while there will be a small more about it) It will be the remainder of the word that will gotta pass under the sign of the (through the coalition) same and his actions. due to the fact that I guess for anyone who isn't a hardcore fan of Tusk, it's apparent that this can't continue. I mean, maybe, but it'll end badly for all of us.
I'll tell you honestly that I have a 2015 flashback. On the 1 hand, since then, polling has not spread so much with election results, but on the another hand, specified a script had to be considered. Since then, I have been carefully formulating any predictions, due to the fact that I remember that at the time I was convinced that there was no anticipation that Komorowski lost these elections. And then Komorowski lost it and it taught me humility. Despite all this, I inactive believed in the polls, which showed that, no more or less, Karol Nawrocki was indigestible to PiSu (and consequently, in a wider position – unchosen).
True, somewhere in the back of my head, a quiet voice said to me, “murder, what if it was the same as in 2015 again”, but I ignored that voice. In my defense, if individual had told me earlier that a candidate who has friends of the gangs (including those who are in love with the legacy of a certain Australian watercolorist), who most likely made a shaft with an flat (+ according to the receipts, testified to the untruth with a notary), who is so heavy addicted to nicotine that he has to (even on a vision) burden into the mouth of a nicotine bag and who mostly has a vibe kind collecting from passers-by hare for passing around his block) will have a real chance to win elections in Poland. I guess I wouldn't believe it. As a substance of fact, on intent I did not mention in this brief enumeration that this man was active in the setups (in another words: he met another coaxed homies and was beating them up after the murders), due to the fact that this is simply a comparatively fresh matter.
The chronicle work is to mention that right after it was mentioned that Nawrocki liked to wash his mouth with his colleagues under the forest, the politicians of the United Right abruptly began to outrun themselves in the communicative that it would actually be nothing like that, due to the fact that neither, hehehehe, liked to wash their mouths in youth. And besides, if any dudes have a date under the woods, is that truly so bad? As a substance of fact, I had the worst opinion about Andrzej Duda, but even after specified a man, I would not anticipate to say specified nonsense. Just like saying that specified a set-up is normal, due to the fact that erstwhile young men are more of a relative, they just request it. If a Nobel Prize was awarded in the category of “developmental psychology”, Andrzej Duda would surely win it.
I know I'm taking more time than I need, but let's not let ourselves be told that setting up is simply a average thing. Let us not let ourselves be told that if individual has always participated in a ‘salt’, it is the same as a regular conflict in the performance of a brazberdiada sweating with an om and a board. Let's not let ourselves be told that this has always been average behavior. The biggest absurdity is that Andrzej Duda and others (including Jarosław Kaczyński) know that they defend the lost origin and know that they normalize banditism due to the fact that they are not stupid adequate to not see it. However, as always in the United Right, everything is subject to 1 goal, which is to take care of the image of the party. Since the organization has chosen specified a candidate, it means that he is simply a decent man (until he wishes to say "crystal"). If this decent, crystal man has been on the stand, then the setup must be good too. It's unusual how no of these geniuses have yet offered to depenalize the bill. due to the fact that if it's so good and necessary, why would you ban it... That's the 1 thing I keep reasoning about. If Nawrocki said that "well, I had specified an episode in my life, I was young and stupid then, I regret it/etc." but nothing happened. Not much, our future president may be arrogant of it.
And specified a candidate has a real chance of winning the election. If all this ends with his win, we will never get free of the public debate of the "genial strategist" from Żoliborz, but it is only a digression.
I think this is the right time for a thought experiment: how would the United Right respond if it were found that KO had set up specified a candidate? How rapidly would she rise arguments (all right) that it is simply a fall of customs and that it cannot be that individual with specified connections and specified a communicative becomes president of the Polish Republic? due to the fact that the candidate is theirs: we gotta defend all this. And although this time it may be possible to make specified a individual not to become president, it is not to be forgotten that the Law and Justice Agency has thus set a fresh standard. With all my aversion to Mentzen and Bosak, even the 2 gentlemen together did not have a rich past like Charles Nawrocki. Unfortunately, this cannot be "returned" in any way. Even if Nawrocki loses, even if in 2027 the PiS and the confederacy do not have adequate votes to form coalitions, we will inactive live in the incorrect leg of time in which the mainstream organization can (if she wants) put a guy with specified a past in elections.
And as far as the second circular is concerned, I am inactive secretly counting on the fact that, as a society, we will not play the "hold me a beer" card and yet we will not decide that our president will be specified a man. Unfortunately, this means (for the time far more) voting for "minor evil". The difference between this vote and the erstwhile vote is that now this greater evil is truly wrong. And I honestly can't imagine a situation where I would vote for individual like that. And I'm a small amazed that the PiSu electorate (I don't mean concrete) doesn't treat this candidacy like spitting in the face. Most likely the reason why the electorate does not rebel is not that he loves Nawrocki, but that we have a very strong polarization (I am so old that I remember how scholars in speech and writing explained that this election is the beginning of a strong polarization), it is due to this polarization, or alternatively due to it that rather quite a few people reason as follows: even if it is simply a gangus, it is at least our gangus.
After writing the above text, my eyes saw another verble text by Rafał Wosia, in which he explained that this full criticism of Nawrocki, this (verble) classism. It's a method you've mastered to perfection. I am not referring to the usage of classism as a baton (I would not be myself if I did not mention that it is highly classy to bind a social class to a gangious past [as if gangs, kibolami/etc. remained only representatives of this peculiar social class), but that Woś from the minute erstwhile the United Right lost power and began to bear the consequences of his actions, describes these consequences as if they were embedded in vacuum. Because, you know, it's not like the Law and Justice were playing with the election law and pumping public money into a run (which is hard evidence) and for that he was denied part of the subsidy. no of that: PiS was denied subsidies as part of political revenge. It was akin with Matecki, it was not so that he went to jail due to the fact that he was active in the process which in the recordings immortalized Mraz. no of that: Matecki was detained due to the fact that he was an opposition MP. And in the case of Nawrocki, we are dealing with precisely the same mechanism: it is not so that the kind is criticized for a very vague past, unusual connections, "housing problems" (sorry, I had to) and at the age of 26 (having a wife, a kid and a job) he washed his mouth on setups. No, it's not like that. He is criticized for being of this “worse” social class. I'm completely unsurprising Jack. But adequate of these digressions, due to the fact that you gotta end this wall of text.
As I have said many times, we do not know what it will be. Even if the sovereign concludes that Jarosław Kaczyński was incorrect to choose specified a candidate, then if nothing changes in the conduct of the ruling coalition (and, for example, no 1 will explain to the PSL that he should rescind, due to the fact that we are just going to the full country on the wall), then any things will just go back in time. On the another hand, I mentioned this in the erstwhile paragraph, what Kaczyński did erstwhile he exhibited Nawrocki, it is impossible to "cancell" in any way. Sorry, that's the climate.
I realize that I have not made specified a pessimistic text in a long time, but I besides realize that it is not even the least of my fault. And with this (very pessimistic accent) I will end the above wall of text.
Source:
https://election.gov.pl/president2025/en/event/en
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elections_parliamentary_w_Polsce_w_2023_roku
(never stops playing me
that the 2020 elections are "second".
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential election_in_Polsce_in_2020_roku_(second)
https://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Presidential Elections_in_Poland_in_2025_year
https://x.com/SlawomirMentzen/status/1926668244435243197
![Tajemnicze groby dzieci i monety z czasów królów. Co odkryto w Tarkawicy? [ZDJĘCIA]](https://radio.lublin.pl/wp-content/uploads/2025/07/516602104_1046125810967761_180239605007938586_n-2025-07-11-115253.jpg)
