This may seem absurd to many readers, but it is already being implemented in practice. Here, looking for a definition of a word in the network, I went to Wikipedia's website, and there, to my amazement, there was a censor record: ‘The content of this Article may not comply with the rules neutral viewpoint,
due to the fact that the article is written from a spiritual perspective”. Therefore, without waiting for this squad to "constitute" and at the same time trying to relieve him of his hard and liable work, I decided to mark my column with an appropriate adnotation of a threat to democracy, only a democracy fighting.
Many people are seriously afraid about developments in Poland. And even more afraid is the fact that a large part of the society, as if it does not see a problem, does not announcement that people active in russian Russia's communist force apparatus are returning to power at various levels. I frequently hear opinions that people have a short memory, that they have forgotten what they truly were and what Poland was like. I disagree with that opinion. In my opinion, these people have excellent memory and full consciously accept the return of communist apparatusists to power. In the autumn of 2023, they voted in favour of specified developments.
To justify the accuracy of my assessment, I will give 1 example. A fewer days ago, journalists from “Gazeta Polska” revealed the household roots of justice Anna Bator-Ciesielska. Your justice is known not only for her judgments, but besides for her active activity in the Iustitia Association. In an association whose members are far from the apolitical judges required and openly manifest their views. possibly not so much views, but hatred of parties and right-wing formations, articulated as 8 stars. Journalists revealed that Tadeusz Bator, the judge's father, was a longtime agent of the Communist safety Service and co-worker of the intelligence of the People's Poland. He was besides a Catholic priest, but this is only an additional coloring of the story, for his priestly ministry was far from being authentically called.
Following the publication of this information, justice Anna Bator-Ciesielska issued a message stating: "I had no thought my dad was a co-worker of PRL intelligence, so I don't know anything about it, nor do I justice it.”. There's no reason not to believe the judge, but the problem is not whether she knew or not. The problem is that erstwhile a large part of the society in PRL struggled to make ends meet, erstwhile many people were being watched and persecuted, Anna Bator lived in abundance which her father provided her with her agential activity. Tadeusz Bator helped his daughter to survey in Austria. He got her a passport with multiple border crossing clause and in order to supply her with decent accommodation conditions he bought an flat in Vienna. erstwhile 20-year-old Anna decided to return to Poland after her first semester of survey to survey at the Faculty of Law at the University of Warsaw, her father bought her a three-room flat in Sadyba.
For Anna Bator, as can be seen from the facts cited above, the People's Poland was a country "milk and honey flowing". The circular table and the changes after 1989 may have caused her concerns. erstwhile Anna Bator graduated from law school Mariusz Kamiński headed the Republican League, which opposed the return to power of post-communists as a consequence of the September 1993 parliamentary election. specified activity of Mariusz Kamiński, surviving “like a donut in butter” Anna Bator could treat as a threat to her life status. Is it so amazing that justice Anna Bator-Ciesielska sentenced in 2023 “a light hand” by Mariusz Kamiński and Maciej Wąsik to 2 years in prison? It's not the only high-profile conviction given by a justice who has a circumstantial left-wing sensitivity. It was justice Bator-Ciesielska who replaced the activist who smashed the front window chain in the pro-live van, a financial punishment for verbal reprimand.
Anna Bator's case is just an example. There are hundreds of thousands, millions. These are our neighbors, coworkers, frequently friends. These people, or their parents, supported the oppressive strategy of People's Poland, were more or little aware of the beneficiaries of this system. They didn't forget what the PRL was, they remember and dream of his return. This is why the Sejm passed the Emergency Act, according to which the validity of the election of the president in 2025 is to regulation the 15 judges with the oldest seniority in the ultimate Court. Not this or another ultimate Court Chamber, not the full ultimate Court in full. These are to be judges who are not members of any Chamber, who do not have any formal and legal structure, who are not even members of any "advised elders". They are joined only by the fact that they were appointed judges by the Council of the State of People's Poland. Not any of them, not most of them, but all of them, virtually all. Admittedly, Adam Strzembosz was right to say that the judges would clean themselves. And they cleared themselves of judges appointed after 1989 in free Poland. They've cleared themselves of pain, they're all communists. And they will approve the election of the president of Poland in 2025. most likely after consultation and countersignate Putin.
These judges do not have a short memory, those Members who have "anointed" them do not have a short memory, those voters who have elected these Members mostly do not have a short memory either. And young people who naturally do not remember the times of the People's Poland, who live in the virtual planet of modern technology, I urge asking artificial intelligence what criteria had to be met to become a justice in PRL. I asked and got the following answer:
‘In order to become a judge, the PRL had to meet the following main criteria:
1. Legal education – the completion of law studies and the performance of the judicial application
2. Ideological affiliation – loyalty to state ideology, including frequently membership of the PPR or another organizations supporting the authorities
3. Positive political and moral opinion – affirmative verification by organization bodies and services, which took into account, inter alia, social background and civic attitude"
Mr Bogdan
