Sports competition should take place in the spirit of fair play, should be clean and honest. The level in many disciplines is so advanced and the skill of athletes so leveled that frequently not only the fans, but besides the judges find it hard to objectively measure who crossed the finish line first, whether the ball hit the line or fell off the field, whether the player fell himself losing the balance or was fouled.
Therefore, in most sports, especially in competitions for advanced stakes, modern technology helps judges. Different types of videoverifications (VARs) or eye falcons (Hawk-Eye or Challenge) let judges to verify decisions to make fair decisions. What, then, prevents the competition in modern sports from being pure and honest in a spirit of fair play? At the Olympics in Paris men were allowed to compete in women's boxing. The scandal broke out at the minute erstwhile Italian player Angela Carini, after a fewer twelve seconds of unequal and unfair competition, refused to proceed fighting with Algeria's typical Iman Khelif. Can you ask how that's even possible? I mean, all you gotta do is look at the photograph from the verdict of this fight:
Can sight be confused? possibly it's not a man, though, it's just—I'm sorry for everyone's blunt expression—a peculiarly ugly woman? possibly it is worth asking for Robert Biedron's opinion, after all, he is an expert on male beauty ..... But it is the 21st century, the year 2024, and neither the fans nor the judges gotta trust on a false assessment of their own eyesight. Just as doping is simply a distortion of fair competition, so allowing men to fight in women's discipline is not only a distortion of fair competition, but is besides an open discrimination against women. Therefore, athletes are subject to restrictive anti-doping controls and, in the event of suspicion or doubt, are subjected to medical tests to find gender. And so it was for the Algerian. The global Boxer Union (IBA) ordered a time of medical investigating to show that Iman Khelif has XY chromosomes, so he is simply a man. Based on the results of these tests, IBA excluded Algerian from competing in female boxing. The problem seemed settled and the case closed. However, the global Olympic Committee (MKOL) found that public fisting a female in the ringing by a stronger man was an expression of freedom. The same MKOL found that parody by sexual deviants of the scene of the Last Supper from the painting of Leonard da Vinci was an expression of artistic freedom. Is there a limit to this madness?
It seems that all boundaries have already been crossed. Even the UN peculiar Rapporteur on force against Women and Girls stated: "Angela Carini was right to follow her instincts and give precedence to physical security, but she and another players should not be exposed to physical and intellectual gender-based violence". The Italian Minister for household Affairs and Equal Opportunities Eugenia Roccella said: “It is very disturbing that 2 transgender people, men identifying themselves as women, were allowed to compete for women's boxing during the Olympic Games in Paris after being excluded from the last competitionIt’s okay. ”
There are besides voices justifying the decision of the MKOL and defending the Algerian player. There are opinions that Imane Khelif has a uncommon developmental defect called Swyer syndrome. But immediately after the Olympics in Paris will be held the Paralympic Games, the largest sporting event for people with disabilities. Is this not a expression designed and intended precisely for people affected by various types of developmental defects, or for people who have become crippled as a consequence of various diseases or random accidents? possibly in 4 years, the MKOL will connect the Olympics with the Paralympics. possibly in the name of a perverted notion of freedom, we can watch any brat fist a individual handcuffed to a wheelchair. In the name of his freedom, which does not admit and respect the freedom of another man?
On Friday, August 2, the Algerian Olympic Committee issued a sharp message stating: "We reserve the right to prosecute all who participated in the hideous run against Imane Khelif. Good luck to our heroine. Long live Algeria“. So everything according to the peacock, as understood by the Algerian Olympic Committee and the MKOL. At the same time in Venezuela, Nicolás Maduro, who received around 30% of the vote in the election, stated that he had been supported by more than half of the voters to become president of Venezuela. According to the law, like him, Nicolás Maduro understands them. At the same time in Poland people are thrown out of work, priests and officials are arrested as well as MPs with Polish and EU immunity. It's all legal, as Donald Tusk understands. Is there a limit to this madness?
Mr Bogdan
