Is the Confederacy an anti-Polish party

Sławomir Mentzen made an perfect coming out. Rape called it “an inconvenience”. In not so parliamentary words, colleagues in training stated that if he went to prison, with specified a face a cherub in prison he might be met with any “inadventure”. – Can this Confa yet get from... our women? – a short, male question came out.

Presidential election 2025. Absence of tolerance to “infuse”

MentzenI don't think he realizes how disconnected he is from social emotion in Poland.

In Poland there is no tolerance for rape. This is 1 of the most terrible crimes and regardless of opinion, Poles believe that the penalties (actually ridiculously low) should be increased. How can a typical of the right call rape an inconvenience? Does this mean that he is besides a supporter of tolerance for the perpetrators? Lowering penalties for degenerates? What about kid rapists – both in sutannas and without?

But whether in a organization built on popularity Janusz Korwin-Mikkego, a man who wanted to lower the age in which an adult can have sex with a minor, can specified views truly be surprising? yet Confederation She put dog food supporters in the election. In many respects this organization is closer to freaks like a organization demanding the legalization of pedophilia in Netherlands than to a real freedom group.

Parallel Krzysztof Bosak stated that Poles could only be able to meet the ethnic-religious criteria defined by the authorities. We already had specified a strategy in Poland: in which for people of appropriate origin in PRL class, under German racial occupation—there were certain privileges. Both systems, although to varying degrees, were totalitarian. The Confederacy refers to the national tradition – bench ghettos, “not buying from a Jew”, yellow stars, the execution of assimilation minorities. But why do they call it freedom?

Sławomir Mentzen and survey on the Religiousness of the Pole

But in fact, what I'm wondering is, how will they measurement the level of religion? According to ecclesiastical studies, not more than 1 4th of Poles regularly participate in spiritual practices, a akin number of people regularly pray for cognition of the truths of religion (and these basic ones) it is better not to speak. It reminds me of a friend who tried to pass an accelerated premarital course, erstwhile asked about the Composition of the Apostles, he said, “St. Peter, Saint Paul, Saint John—I inactive do not remember.”

Bosak, who gives spiritual testimonies, may be very surprised. In the Confederate electorate, the attachment to Catholicism is negligible. For young people who have late passed through absurd catechetical teachings about sexuality and immeasurable boredom of retreat, The church is associated as an institution completely detached from reality and their own sensitivity.

Young people, if they declare their support for the Confederacy, is not due to the fact that they are fascinated by the Act of the Gietrzwald Confederation – signed by Mentzen and Grzegorz Braun paper “subjecting our private and public life to the reign of Christ the King of Poland and the care of His Blessed Mother, Queen of the Polish Crown. With their self-control we realize completely realistically, not only symbolically" – but due to the fact that Confederate politicians successfully managed to hide their actual views.

Moreover, most of our countrymen respect spiritual issues as private, almost intimate. Even in environments traditionally regarded as religious—like a village—the manifestation of devolution is not welcome, not to mention the fattening of the Catholic Church by politicians with taxpayers' money. And Catholicism in Poland has a cultural face, not like the spiritual fervor of the Protestant Biblical Belt in USA. There is besides no Russian tradition of poorness of the Tsar – which he uses Vladimir Putin, idols of many erstwhile and present Confederates.

Presidential election. "There is no worse weapon for Confederates"

Nationals from the Confederacy revealed how disconnected they were from the tradition of authentically Polish: the Warsaw Confederation, which guaranteed spiritual rights within the political nation (meaning nobility). The Confederation has nothing to do with the Polish Kazimierz Wielki, who invited the exiled from Spain Jews (and he did well, due to the fact that with them came financial and commercial know-how, not to mention capital), with Bolesław Chrobry, who took the crown from the hands of Otto III the ruler, who Sclavonia (by default Poland) saw as part of the emerging fresh European order.

The celebrated Polish spiritual tolerance, from which we are rightly proud, although oppressed by the Contrareformation and efforts of reactionary invaders and the cooperating pope and Catholic Church, was sometimes the top Polish triumphs and expansion. Not by accident. Only specified an open ideology could make specified different nations and religions co-operate within 1 state (and previously the union of 2 states). From Catholic Coronarians from Lesser Poland and Greater Poland, through Orthodox Rusins, Cossacks, Lithuanians, Armenians, Jews, Tatars, even homegrown Enlightened Arians and another Christian denominations formed after the Reformation, all in the First Republic, at the time of its glory, could find their place.

Confederates, revealing their actual face, showed how much their freedom spells were just bait for ignorant voters, who, like worms on the hook, threw their—distracted from economical and geopolitical realities—free market. The consequence of their imagination is Poland without allies, with a society in which the strongest and best placed wins, with deep oppressive Catholic-national power, like Franco and Salazar, being the vassal of Moscow. The plastic tic-tok candidate got what he wanted. Poles saw politics in it, not the fun star of patostreaming.

Turns out there's no worse weapon on the Confederates than doing what they've been demanding for years. Taking their views seriously.

Leszek Jażdżewski