Intervention in Iran would be a catastrophic mistake [ OPINION]

Contrary to speculation on the night of 14 on 15 January [there was no attack on Iran](https://defence24.pl/defence-politics-defence/nyt-preparation-for-hit-on-iran-issue-seated-se-se-se-se-se-se-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st-st). Prior to that, Trump suggested that Iran's authorities had stopped killing protesters, and executions of those sentenced in instant trials were to be halted. He besides suggested that Iran gave signals that it was ready to negotiate. There must be restraint against these reports, but they may indicate that the American president wants to retreat from erstwhile announcements that bloody [defence](https://defence24.pl/geopolitics/bunt-in-iranie-do-system-survivor-commentary) will meet the U.S. military response. However, the deficiency of plans for the execution of demonstrators was confirmed by Iranian diplomatic chief Abbas Aragchi, and the vice president J. D. Vance was to press for the diplomatic alternatively of the attack. No wonder, due to the fact that a hit like that could bury his chances of election in 2028.