Does Poland request a left?

Such a left, a small in the spirit of the pre-war PPS, and a small in the old Scandinavian model, needs Poland today. The left side of average people, socially united and at the same time advocating modernisation (infrastructure plus technology) and pro-state.

Piotr Lewandowski

I am trying to avoid the subject of the current organization policy here, but, on the occasion of the presidential election, I will let myself a tiny exception – although even this exception will apply to more general matters. The inspiration for this column is the unexpectedly good consequence of Adrian Zandberg from the opposition left-wing organization Together, who with a consequence of 4.86% overtakes the typical of the "government" left, or Magdalena Biejat (4.23%), and was small short of Simon Holownia (4.99%). This comparative success of the leader of the “canap”, the niche group, if it is translated into parliamentary elections, means that “compartments” with favourable winds could number on themselves to exceed the electoral threshold. This is what led me to the task of the title question: is Poland needed by the left? And if so, what?

However, before I go into detailed discussions, let me first tell you the planet in advance, so as not to leave unnecessary understatements about what positions I take to this mini-analysis. I am a conservative (in the sense of civilization and culture), a solidarityist (in the socio-economic sense), a sovereign (state and national), and a denialist (because I approach the various truths revealed by the media mainstream and its on-call authorities with far-reaching distrust). Therefore, it is easy to imagine that any "genderisms", "elgiebetisms" and "Vokisms" (including those promoted by the large alleged "Vocity", "diversity", equity, inclusion) I find harmful, ideological cancer – especially if they are linked to the suppression of freedom of speech under the pretext of fighting "fake news" and "word hate". Like an unlimited free marketplace (especially in its globalistic variant of Davos) is simply a deadly recipe for modern slavery, atomicization, dissection and regulation of Plutacratic oligarchy for social cohesion. Nor am I, to put it mildly, an enthusiast of the European Union in its present form, and in peculiar in the centralised version of the superstate in which it is being sought to recycle, and if this trend cannot be stopped (and most likely cannot be) a polyxit will be necessary. yet – madness and hysteria, specified as quasi-religion of climateism, I consider another installment of social engineering, which will consequence in widespread pauperization, middle-class liquidation and the closure of us all in the neo-totalitarian "green gulag".

Here we return to the question of the left. Well, I think that the left is needed in Poland – and it is in the version presented in the presidential run by Adrian Zandberg, not Magdalena Biejat.

What did he do? He hid profoundly the alleged vice and various copied from Western campuses the voicing crazys of the genus 56 genders, feminatives, "imposives" and 3rd toilets – all this leftist, "sleet" agenda in his message practically did not exist. What was he talking about? On Public Services Co-financing (Applause for the intervention by president Duda on blocking the simplification of the wellness contribution for "entrepreneurs"!), on social housing; on strategical infrastructure investments with peculiar emphasis on atomic energy; on R & D expenditure; on workers' rights; on the request to decision distant from today's anachronistic improvement model based on inexpensive labour; and finally, on the request for a more solidarity-based distribution of taxation burdens and another public dans. In a word, about everything that Poland is desperately lacking today.

Such a left, a small in the spirit of the pre-war PPS, and a small in the old Scandinavian model, needs Poland today. The left side of average people, socially united and at the same time advocating modernisation (infrastructure plus technology) and pro-state. specified a left acts as a safety brake, mythizing various Darwinist spirit, neoliberal impulses – let us add that this kind of left was very lacking in key years of our economical transformation after 1989, due to the baptised post-communist neoliberalism at all. There is besides a request for a left that does not bake in sectarianism, open to constructive cooperation with another environments – Paulina Matysiak, who participates in the "Yes to the CPK" initiative, can be an example. Another example is the "New Citizen" magazine environment that opposes mass immigration, rightly seeing it as a threat to the bargaining position of workers.

What left do we not need? Left-wing “cavioral”, caucian doctriarchs whose “social sensitivity” is limited to legitimate ideological minorities, parasites dependent on government and global agencies (as late the USAID) and global plutocrats and activists de facto in their interests. To sum up: left – yes, left – no!