Directive (EU) 2024/1346 of the European Parliament (PE) and of the Council of the European Union concerning the admission of applicants for global protection is simply a dangerous doctrine for all Europe and its inhabitants. The fresh rules introduce standards aimed at ensuring decent surviving conditions for immigrants but at the same time rise concerns about their possible impact on associate States' societies.
Principles of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility
A key component of the Directive is the rule of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility. The thought is that each associate State should contribute equally to helping applicants for global protection. Theoretically, this approach aims to relieve the burden of countries that are geographically closer to conflict zones and so frequently receive more refugees.
However, the applicable implementation of this rule will lead to crucial financial and social burdens on associate States. The Directive provides that immigrants may receive residence conditions and financial benefits which exceed the standard of surviving of certain nationals of a country. specified a situation can origin opposition and frustration among local communities, especially in the context of existing economical and social problems.
The Directive makes it clear that applicants should not be obliged to cover all or part of the costs of the essential wellness care if this care is free of charge to nationals of the associate State concerned. Furthermore, immigrants should not be forced to borrow to cover the costs of reception conditions.
Such policies aim to guarantee equal opportunities and decent surviving conditions for all, regardless of their immigration status. However, European citizens will gotta bear the costs of caring for immigrants, which will lead to social tensions and a sense of injustice.
One of the most crucial arguments against this directive is its possible impact on the economies of the associate States. Immigrants, who frequently deficiency the skills needed in the European labour market, will become a financial burden for social systems. In the long term, this will lead to increased taxation burden for citizens, as well as a deterioration in the quality of public services specified as healthcare and education. There's a problem right now, and let's remember that society is getting older and spending more and more on medical care. Immigrants will not join the common budget due to the fact that first they do not have the right professional qualifications, and second they are parasites preying on their host who agrees to that! Only that all EU citizen will pay for it due to the fact that it is their taxes that will fund all these benefits!
"Singing Europe" by immigrants
In addition, specified a policy will lead to demographic change and Europe's 'snake', as immigrants will multiply for Europeans' money with European women, due to the fact that there will surely be those who want to "throw blood." This phenomenon will affect the cultural and social identity of the associate States in the long term. These changes may include not only the demographic structure of societies, but besides fundamental values, norms and cultural traditions, which form the foundation of national identity.
While the Directive aims to advance integration and equal opportunities for all Europeans, it will in practice lead to segregation and social tensions. A policy that provides better surviving conditions for immigrants than any citizens will lead to divisions and a sense of injustice.
Large-scale immigration will lead to crucial demographic change in the associate States (now in Germany, France, Italy and the Nordic countries). The increase in immigrant population will affect household structures, labour marketplace dynamics, and access to public services. Immigrants who benefit from generous social benefits will have a higher birth rate, which in turn will lead to faster demographic changes. specified changes are a threat to national and cultural identity, especially in countries that have strong national and historical traditions.
NOT for a "student" Europe!
The Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the reception of applicants for global protection will lead to increased financial burdens on Europeans, social tensions and demographic change that will affect Europe's cultural identity.
The increased financial burden under the Directive will lead to crucial budgetary expenditure by associate States. The funds allocated to support immigrants, including their integration, education and wellness care, will importantly burden the budgets of countries, especially those already facing economical problems. As a result, citizens will feel taxation increases, or cuts in another public sectors, specified as education, infrastructure or social assistance. The changes will lead to social tensions and demographic changes that will remove Europe's cultural identity!
In the face of these challenges, Poland should leave the European Union, which is simply a corrupt device supporting human trafficking. The EU's migration policy is leading to destabilisation of Europe's societies and cultural "scundling" by promoting mass immigration and integration under conditions that are detrimental to associate States.
Poland could first establish alternative, "clean" alliances with countries of the region specified as Hungary, the Baltic States, Slovakia, the Czech Republic and Slovenia. These alliances would aim to advance regional cooperation based on common values and interests, without the burden of EU immigration policy.
- Hungary: Hungary is 1 of the most loud critics of EU immigration policy. Close cooperation with Hungary could strengthen Poland's position in the region and enable coordination of border protection and migration policy activities.
- Baltic States: Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia, although EU members, besides have reservations about any EU policies. Cooperation with these countries could aid make a strong block in Central and east Europe, promoting a more restrictive migration policy.
- Slovakia and the Czech Republic: Close cooperation with these countries could lead to an integrated regional bloc that could effectively argue EU policies that are perceived to be unfavourable.
- Slovenia: Slovenia, as a country with akin historical and social experiences, could be a valuable partner in building a regional alliance. Cooperation with Slovenia could cover various aspects, from safety and defence to economical and cultural cooperation.
Establishing alternative, "clean" alliances with the countries of the region could bring a number of benefits:
- Sovereignty: Leaving the EU and establishing regional alliances would let Poland to become more independent in decision making on interior and abroad policy.
- Protection of culture and identity: Regional alliances could take better account of national cultural specificities and traditions, which could aid defend national identity.
- Stability and safety: Close cooperation with the countries of the region could contribute to greater stableness and safety in Central and east Europe, especially in the context of common challenges specified as migration or external threats.
