‘It seems that Polish tv was a subcontractor of the orders of Rafał Trzaskowski's staff, and inactive lost his own debate. Full compromise" – says Jacek Ozdoba in an interview with the portal inPoliticy.pl. Law and Justice politician asks many questions about the sources of backing of the Trzaskowski debate. "Trzaskowski played on his terms, allowed whom he wanted to enter the debate, utilizing masked bodyguards, and inactive lost the debate," our interviewer said.
Television Republic in cooperation with tv in Poland24 and tv Trwam organized a debate of presidential candidates in the marketplace in Konskie. It lacked Rafał Trzaskowski, whose staff preferred to organise its own debate.
Television in Poland24, Republic and tv Trwam has come to the occasion. It is worth noting that the stations adhered to democratic standards and treated all candidates with respect, each of them had the right to talk out. The debate was organised in an open expression involving the public, and the questions were not known to candidates. It's all very professional. I think that if Rafał Trzaskowski had come to this debate, he would most likely feel like another candidates, i.e. on an equal footing with others, specified as Marshal Simon Hołownia, Marek Jakubiak, Joanna Senyszyn or Krzysztof Stanowski. The hosts of this debate behaved precisely as journalists should. Unlike those who led the later gathering of the Deputy Head of the Civic Platform Rafał Trzaskowski staff
“Speaks in conversation4 with the portal inPoliyce.pl Euro MP Jacek Ozdoba.
Who paid for Trzaskowski's debate? There was no committee designation
In the opinion of Jack Decoration, the State Election Commission, but besides the prosecution should examine the principles on which Trzaskowski organised the debate. There may have been serious infringements.
In the case of this second debate, I gotta say that, as a lawyer and a criminal, I see at least a fewer elements that may prove that a crime has been committed. I mean, illegal run funding. Television Poland secured the debate organised by the election staff of the organization presidential candidate. It can be said that representatives of the 3 televisions came to Koński to have a debate with Trzaskowski. The question is, who paid for the rented room? Apart from the fact that not all candidates were immediately allowed in and entered at the last minute. Additionally, there is simply a question of the behaviour of bodyguards, who violently expelled journalists and did not let tv reporters in Poland24 and the Republic in. This should surely be part of criminal proceedings
— erstwhile Deputy Minister for Climate and Environment.
Please note that there was no designation of the electoral committee that organised the debate with Trzaskowski, and the writer leading it confirmed that TVP did not organize it. All these formal issues should be examined in depth. It appears that tv Poland was a subcontractor of the orders of Rafał Trzaskowski's staff And that doesn't fit average people's minds. It all shows that we are dealing with a situation that should not have occurred at all erstwhile it comes to the public discourse of presidential candidates
“ says the Euro MP of Law and Justice.
There cannot be specified a situation that public television, and this in liquidation, ignores the price list of air time, in order to cover up the costs and losses incurred for the operation of the election staff of Rafał Trzaskowski. utilizing sports terminology 1 can say that Trzaskowski played on his field. At 1 point he even said that the questions had been settled, so she interprets it so that he knew these questions. Trzaskowski played on his terms, allowed into the debate whom he wanted utilizing masked bodyguards, and inactive lost this debate. It's the pure embarrassment of Trzaskovsky.
said the politician PiS.
In my opinion, the biggest win of the debate with Trzaskowski is Karol Nawrocki, but besides paradoxically Magdalena Biejat. She showed that Trzaskowski was lying about his left-wingness. Vice-President PO would truly like to leave a rainbow flag on his desktop, only due to the election lie, he was incapable to do so. So he threw his ideals and convictions into the basket
“It tells us how immense the gap between Karol Nawrocki and Rafał Trzaskowski is erstwhile it comes to the level of political culture.
I am pleased to see that Karol Nawrocki is in large form and found himself in both a debate organised by the free media and the other. He supported the another candidates and presented himself with them to Trzaskowski due to the fact that he wanted to show them respect. The biggest loser was Rafał Trzaskowski, who was inactive very upset and not in shape. 1 could not neglect to announcement that he was trying to distort reality and cover his attitudes, for which he was aptly scored by another candidates. This shows that we are undoubtedly dealing with a situation where the candidate of the ruling option is simply a completely unreliable person
“Summary of the Euro MP of the Law and Justice, Jacek Ozdoba.
