Debate on Crazy

Jerzy Karwelishttps://journalistzarazi.pl/12-04-debate-na-variate/

12 April, entry 1351

Man, I promised myself I wouldn't let you pull me into this run of politics. But here I was and there was no silence. I've already written myself, I've recorded a text about the dying Green Order, and it's impossible to react. I'm talking about the alleged presidential debate.

So-called, due to the fact that we've been dealing with any weird form that can only be accepted by any totally freaky company, or by those who live out of it. That's government politicians and leading media. The leading nation, who likes specified a thing in 1 group, due to the fact that thanks to it, knows where to go, and in the another group does not want to go, but is tended to the same leash, due to the fact that that was the will of the former, and specified are the – infallible – judgments of democracy that counted. The expression of this gathering is the wavering election staff of Rafał Trzaskowski. His main competitor – Nawrocki – won from cowards that he was afraid to stand up to debate 1 out of 1. The horse syndrome from erstwhile elections was to be repeated erstwhile Trzaskowski did not come to Konski and Duda had a solo for an empty bleacher. The Tracovians feared that Nawrocki would repeat the number and end up the same. No arguments from the liberal side, but with public assurance that individual here is afraid of debate.

Prior to the debate

So the crackles – masterfully, due to the fact that it is simply a formation prepared in this fight – turned Kaczyński's cat with their tail. It was them, prejudging the possible Nawrock movement – who challenged the PiS candidate for solo, besides in Koński. Among 3 televisions, referred to as mainstream. In addition, there was only 2 days to prepare Nawrocki. So the debate was to take place suddenly, at the request of 1 of the staff, in a truncated group of candidates and media. Chaaad... The fair began erstwhile Nawrocki said that without right-wing tv it was a humbug, The screams laughed that he was a coward.

Nawrock's case of his participation first depended on the presence of “his” television, but he yet surrendered the matter. due to the fact that the showman Hołownia stepped in, he wanted to, too, and there's no invitation. The second kind of fair began, Nawrocki agreed, however, that possibly everyone willing and registered like this, and his televisions will only get a signal, without the right to participate in the debate as a question-seeker. The decision to debate possible participants was found about 2 hours before the event, which was a square scandal. Many failed to get there, many refused, as part of the protest, due to the fact that unlike the main participants, they had 2 hours of time to prepare, including commute. And so this debate began that the late ones would slide so long that the full thing started with a 45-minute delay. After the conflict on the goal, tv was not allowed, which yet showed why the full hucpa. So much for technology, scandalous. I don't even want to deliberalize who wanted to play this full thing and who got out of it. Let's see how the full debate went.

The debate itself

Although there were no crucial twelve at this gathering – Braun, Mentzen – I had 1 impression, which is most likely the participation of many of my fellow countrymen. I've got something like, like, the planet championship, I effort to watch all the teams in the first circular of the first games. Then I'm certain I've been watching the future champion, so far hidden, due to the fact that even before the finale. And now I had the same impression, but it saddens me. Is that what the president of Poland will come out of? Is it that bad with us? It was a nightmare of level, of substance, even of PR. The bottom, and specified wisdom is to be ruled by the Most Clear? The main thesis from my book “Elity” is increasingly confirmed that it is all a performance. If specified a level of Poland as we have seen were the sum of avant-garde (sic!) of Polish politics, we would have been demolished long ago, while there would be no electricity from the circular Table in the sockets. Polish must be ruled by individual else, wiser, not moral and “our” at all, due to the fact that if what we have seen is the maximum ability of Poles to rule, then it is essential to leave the Most Clear and extinguish the light over the unsuccessful project. Or change the alleged elite, but it'll go on.

When I sat down to this text, I wanted to make a brief description of the attitudes of each of the debaters, but I found it unnecessary. So it will be in general – in whole. First – a fugitive from an abstract accident at work – there were no anti-system representatives. It was so lacking that it was the members of the left and the 2050 organization who declared themselves the anti-systemics of the fighting. Without shame confessing their creed anti, though they form a ruling coalition together. So you'd gotta bang your own head to show how much we're against. But in post-political times, you can twist specified volts forever. But on 1 condition – only as you appeal to your own electorate, due to the fact that then there are no demands, or actually only 1 – to bend the hated tribe. And if you even verbally only prove it, then the tough sovereign will not be angry that he actually complains about the mistakes self-proclaimed. But the presidential election is mostly won by those who attract the indecisive. So it is possible to wrap noodles on dirty ears with impunity, but the question is whether the electorate undecided has the memory of a goldfish? It is most likely a decisive issue in these elections, and that, for example, specified Trzaskowski has variable views as in the kaleidoscope shaken by studies, it is simply a decision based on any investigation that specified a number will pass. And since we have indecisive unrememberables, our fates are poor...

In fact, everyone was dirty in the system, but Stanowski and the guy who jumped out like Philip of hemp, due to the fact that the Polish presidential election is served by specified meteorites. So the majority were either from the erstwhile ruling power, or from the present and complained – in full 1 on the other. So it was a debate of the guards who got to clean the yard, set themselves a payment for this service, and the discussion was that it was dirty in the yard. erstwhile guards pointed out that the mess by the current rulers, due to the fact that they messed up how clean it was – the present convinced that we had Versailles, and where the mess was, it was due to the erstwhile non-sweeper. And yes, you can, as you can see, for years. Only for years we stand in this increasingly dirty yard, in an alternating rhythm erstwhile it is simply a noisy quarrel who is guilty of this mess and long periods of apparent slacking of the defender chosen at the 3rd Polish lodge meeting. And now it's the same, which means... there won't be any order. It's gonna be a bigger mess due to the fact that the guards are willing to argue about how they should clean up, more than getting caught for a broom and a towel.

Few anti-systemists

Interesting anti-systemists present. They didn't even deliver that anti-system. Philip of cannabis with an immediately forgotten identity came up with a hybrid. It was clearly set by Holovnia as a Russian onuca that on the 1 hand, the anti-capitalist pacifism, on the another hand, declared himself an entrepreneur. He did not break into Poland with any idea, he was alternatively sarcastic from an unrevealed position. And he had a chance to surprise everyone. It is always so in Poland that erstwhile individual breaks from the large bell through a blockade into the system, and this 1 allows him to speak, it is simply a gibberish, from the mouth of specified liquid madness. I will admit that if I were a system, I would let specified prophets to speak, so that those who hesitate to see that there is nothing to hesitate about here – 1 must choose 1 of the tribes, due to the fact that the remainder are just visible lunatics. possibly I didn't come up with this thought and it's been going on for a long time...

Stanowski, man, I wasn't expected to compose by name, he failed a lot. Is that what this is all about? I know it's expected to be a hucpa and a sneer, but it was possible to hit the rules, not the personalized political scene, just present in doubtful representation. due to the fact that only then would his decision make sense. I'm doing action, I'm going on a run to compromise the system, and I'm just clinging to the causative things and the sins of rivals. It didn't truly work out well, and you could have gone. Anyway – no 1 took Poland seriously, so there were tribal collapses, that is... boredom.

Main sewage mine

The 2 rivals of the main tribes fought as if the remainder were gone, but so they set up their staffs. They didn't answer questions, they just recited formulas not about them, they just asked each other. Again we had a performance of the Polish-Polish war, boring as it was said and predictable. But this is nothing – since this is simply a dispute, let's say that 2 visions of the direction of Poland's development, it is woe to us. Trzaskowski turned his tail all the time, attributing himself, not to the Law and Justice, activity and affluence in the areas which Kaczyński in many cases initiated, but – as it was said – no 1 is paying attention to it anymore, the worst that most likely and hesitant. Nawrocki knocked Trzask after the crutches, but the second knew where the punches would go, and either he was prepared for it, or – more frequently – he was coming down from the line of blow into the areas of the ringing that he had covered from above. God, but this is what these debates look like – nothing comes from them. Nothing but one. The state of our country.

Yes, wars and customs are raging over us, the world's cards are shuffling. What are we talking about? The LGBT banners, the church fund, the double personality of the candidates, or who knows the names of the presidents of the Baltic countries. And the situation is different. Yes, we sit in the basement and – any due to the fact that the majority organization – we wonder who and what news will bring us to this basement. any sounds come from above, their interpretations in the basement group are highly biased, alternatively relying on the hope that nothing peculiar will happen yet and possibly somehow. But no one, no one, will hesitate about the key issue – and where did we find ourselves in this basement of events? After all, so far we have been told that we are in salons, that no 1 comes down here to us with news of what will happen to us, that this darkroom is fundamentally salons just before the fireworks of our co-decision. That's what we were told, and it turns out this is the basement. And no 1 asks how we got here.

In the basement room.

And this is not just about crying over spilled milk, what is being taught – right, the basement, but what now? You'd better think about what we're expected to do in this basement than settle in there right now. And that's the attitude he wants from us, due to the fact that it relieves them of their collective responsibility.

And here we request to find out why we ended up in this basement – due to the fact that this is not even about punishment (about this, later) – only that if we do not know the reasons for our fall, we will never get out of this basement. Never – the full Transfiguration Verchex of the 3rd Republic of Poland will tell us that either nothing is happening, or that they are guilty, or that we gotta reconcile, due to the fact that it is, Lord, the determinism of history, which makes us there for specified large revolutions of powers.

And now we have an chance – elections, and so there is simply a procedure, not to say that dialogue, but a chance for different diagnoses. Nothing. A passing Russian-Ukrainian war tank threw a stone out of the caterpillar that broke a window in our cellar. The abrupt snob of light first blinded us, but it was already possible to realize that it was the basement where we sit, not the causative salons. But erstwhile it came out that it was a cellar, it was to hide this sad and at the same time a abrupt fact, we started throwing supplies out the window for the fighting Ukraine. And we have remained on this work so far, adding a fewer million colleagues from the East to our staff. That's all we could afford. Not materially, but intellectually, rather, volitionally. A fewer laws have done “in the subject”, which in the parliamentary-office strategy means that the parliament has done its own, and the government, in an age of incalculability not even from promises, but transportation of the primary function of the state, which is security, can do a state conference against the background of any concrete goat and go on wine.

And about our situation, my dear, nothing to debate. Nothing about the state, everything you can (bad) about the political opponent. And this – note – with specified aggression at the same time in communicative fumes of calling for consent and filling divisions. It came out fatally, possibly in another debate, full of turnouts, with the presence of any tame anti-systemists (I apologize for oxymoron, but you can't dream about it?) but it will be a bit about the principles. But the effect, actually, should be just one. With this elite, we won't get out of this corner unless individual outside is holding the wheel. And if so, we will go from this tower where the hand holding the wheel will want. Just like I announced my book, I got quite a few reproach that what he's writing about was no elite but descendants of activists brought in on russian tanks. No, my dears, they are our elites. The fact that our elites have been wiped out is true, that many have been self-named, is besides true, but that is all with the consent of our inactivity. In democracy, even taking into account media force and filtering electoral ordination – we have the elite as our nation is. And we could just see them all the way through our mediocrity.

I think I request to get back to pre-discourse literature. Either I have empathy, or I've already read something like that I'm writing. Many Poles then, as well as now, looked at akin situations: the freedom of a sovereign, the selling of rulers, lying narratives to justify the unheard of things, yet – any common inability that nothing can be done, despite the reasonable solutions lying on the table. That this is to take place again with repetitive theatres – independence, quarrels, disintegration, disintegration, reflection, pen and sword fighting, more readiness for a beneficial turn of global affairs than a fight, yet the feast of regaining the Brightest. Rotative.

Horse talk

If I were allowed to stand in those ferocious horses, I wouldn't attack my opponents. It's the nation that sees all day. He would not talk about Poland either, due to the fact that it is the mouth of the worst of the rulers. I would turn to Poles with this:

You've just seen this repetitive performance. This Polish-Polish war. She is like an American wrestling – 2 strongmen fight in the ring, but it is simply a directed fight. The point is that you think this is simply a dispute about how to delight Poland and citizens. No, it's a fight for who gets paid for the tickets to that show you're paying for. There is nothing another than the present state of the substance that stems from the sterility of this dispute.

You've heard a bunch of empty promises today, like the president is expected to be a one-man government, a super-prime minister who manages all the ministers. This is another lie in these supplies – I will tell you what the president can truly do. The constitution is weak and to be corrected, it is no doubt, but it contains 1 interesting thing – the position of the President. She's the 1 who works best if the president's outside of this mess. due to the fact that if you vote for the president from the ruling camp, then we have a “closed system”, there are no more systemic brakes for autocracy. If individual from the opposing camp wins, we have chaos and a crisis, like now, erstwhile the government, in order to avoid the president's veto, governs the resolutions of parliament and the expertise of hired lawyers.

Poland needs a president outside of this war, who will be mythic about these tribes, and has tools to do so, so that they are not utilized for organization interests. This can be done due to the fact that it is simply a real function of the President, not invented by the authors of the Constitution, but due to the coincidence of the tribality of Polish policy: the president is to be the peacemaker of this dispute, and you have just seen that this dispute in tribal optics leads to nothing.

You're thinking, this guy's saying good things, but why should we give him a voice erstwhile the tribal fight evens it anyway? Well, not just the first circular of presidential elections is the only minute where you do not gotta choose a smaller but besides tribal evil. You can vote not at all by heart but by convincing arguments. It is in the second circular that you will gotta calculate, but then I ask you 1 thing – remember this force in your jaws. due to the fact that you are the electorate of "clogged teeth", who will one more time vote for choosing a lesser evil. You don't gotta do that – you can choose the greater common good. And that's what I'm proposing to you – coming out of this amok of a regular bulge, in which you are drawn day after day by a tribal Polish politician and bassing her media.

And don't be afraid of a wasted voice. Be free in your choice, vote as the intuition of common sense tells you, not the apparent calculation. My vote does not count," said 5 million voters. due to the fact that there are so many of you -- voters with their teeth clamped. Give me the vote and you'll see that everything can be changed.

Start by not winning in the Polish-Polish war, but winning over this war. My choice will supply you and the Polish country with specified an crucial social peace. We have crucial challenges ahead of us. Remember, they will turn us against each other, so that in this war we have no strength nor time to look up, due to the fact that then possibly we will realize the actual origin of our deteriorating situation. It's not my destiny in your hands, it's your destiny in your hands. So there is no easier way for us to get out of this stasis. You must have a plan to heal Poland. We request to start by repairing the system, our incorrect manual of operation of Poland is the main origin of its problems. We have much greater potential, but due to the flawed state manual, not only do we not usage it, but we spoil everything. In order to begin to correct this, we request to start with the first page of this instruction, and so openly, to improve further parts is the president outside the group of those who have so messed up, that we think only they know how to correct it. No – they are only in power due to the fact that they wrote this instruction under themselves. Its essence is the main sins of the 3rd Polish Republic: the governorship of the party, the concrete electoral system, the deficiency of control of power from institutions, parasitising on public resources, yet servillism and susceptibility to control from outside. And above all, the treatment of the state, including citizens, as the prey for which political disguises fight.

In many countries, this strategy has been demasked, which leads to a realization of the system, the political strategy is beginning to reflect more and more the aspirations of voters, not the agenda of local and globalist elites, hiding behind the appearance of a tribal conflict for everything that has become politics. It can be arranged so that it will not become – as in Poland – a field for a devastating war that weakens our improvement potential. It can become a compromise in the improvement of the common good. So let us return to the sources and the first article, possibly the only constitution, whose only evidence to leave behind is that: the Republic of Poland is the common good of all citizens. Not any elite, party, force groups, abroad powers. My start is simply a call to improve the system, to both activate the possible of Poland, but besides to fulfil this basic condition – that more Poles are included in the government.

Vote for me – a non-starting candidate.

He wrote and read Jerzy Karwelis

All entries on my blog "The diary of the plague".