‘Forgive me, but justice Martiniak's statements will not truly be a determinant of what is or is not legal, due to the fact that we are talking about the legality of the minister of finance and let these 2 legal elements come true, and I have no uncertainty that the Minister of Finance will act in accordance with the law, but there must be the actions of the competent authorities of the state in the right form," said Maciej Berek, Head of the Committee of the Permanent Council of Ministers, in an interview with Polsat News. In this way, he answered the question whether the finance minister should pay out the money to PiS, as suggested yesterday in the same station by PKW president Sylwester Marciniak. Minister Berk has “stood” that we have here not only the “speaks of justice Marciniak”, but the resolution of the PCW and the ruling of the ultimate Court.
When it was essential to take over public media – no 1 in the government long hesitated whether the action that the Coalition chose for this intent on December 13 would be legal. Similarly, erstwhile usurpers were introduced to the National Prosecutor's Office – first Jack Bilewicz, later Dariusz Korneluk. Keeping a clergyman and 2 officials in detentions, abuse of specified measures as handcuffs against them – also. Moreover, Prime Minister Donald Tusk himself announced in September 2024 that his squad might commit "things that any legal authorities believe would be incompatible or not full in line with the provisions of the law", but nothing exempts the current government from the "obligation of action", and what is more, the Prime Minister must "take decisions that can be easy criticised and challenged from the legal side." erstwhile it comes to paying the money of the largest opposition party, so that the election run can be equal and fair – ministers, headed by the head of the finance department, Andrzej Domanski, on whom this task rests, abruptly have quite a few disquiet as to the legality of this action – even though there is simply a resolution of the PCW and the ruling of the ultimate Court.
Legalists from the Tusk Coalition
Whether these funds are to be paid is determined by 2 elements: the ultimate Court's ruling and the resolution of the State Election Commission, not the opinion of the president of PKW, due to the fact that we could find a message by Sylwester Marciniak erstwhile he said: the resolution that PKW adopted, everyone understands what he wants
“In the meantime,” said Maciej Berek, head of the Standing Committee of the Council of Ministers, in an interview with Polsat News.
Forgive me, but justice Martiniak's statements will not truly be an indication of what is or is not legal, due to the fact that we are talking about the legality of the Minister of Finance's activities and let these 2 legal elements come actual and I have no uncertainty that the Minister of Finance will act in accordance with the law, but must be the actions of the competent authorities of the state in the right form taken
said Berek, asked by a writer about a erstwhile message by the president of PKW Sylwester Marciniak, who stressed in the same station that Domanski should pay the funds. And, interestingly, in this very statement, Marciniak pointed out the ruling of the SN and the resolution of the PKW.
Why the “problem” with the resolution of the PCW?
According to Minister Maciej Berk, on 30 December the members of the committee "differenced in explaining what they had actually passed".
Those of you who are following this know that PKW, recognizing this letter from the Minister of Finance, at a gathering which was available, openly, showed: yes, we do not know what this resolution means.
– pointed out the politician.
They said they needed 2 weeks to come up with 2 concepts of this answer. With all due respect to president Martiniak, this is simply a substance for the State Election Commission and we are waiting. The Finance Minister hopes that the PKW will yet decide what it has passed
“The guest of Polsat News assessed the issue of the ultimate Court Chamber, which recognized the PiS complaint.
It is crucial that the ultimate Court hears a complaint from the election committee. This isn't about my judgment, this is about serious names, lawyers. The complaint of the PiS election committee was not dealt with by the SN, formed in accordance with the regulations
He said.
‘This is the consequence of erstwhile actions”
Marcin Fijołek pointed out that the Chamber of Extraordinary Control and Public Affairs issued regular decisions, which are then enforced.
The Council of Ministers is not liable for interfering with the ultimate Court. This is the consequence of actions taken by predecessors, very consciously
“Polsat News responded. According to Minister Berk, these changes introduced the PiS to “the crew that did this have a sense of impunity”.
Let us remind that the same chamber ruled on the validity of the October 2023 elections and no 1 had doubts about that ruling at the time – interesting why?
According to Berk, the head of the finance department "does not act in political motivation, but seeks a solution that will be legally unambiguous".
But is it clear by law as the Coalition of December 13th understands it?
aja/Polsat News
