Those who are afraid about the imagination of the EU and WEF imposing diet choices were labelled and ridiculed in Poland by the awakened media as an unmodern and xenophobic darkland. Any discussion on this subject is allegedly an election campaign. What if I did? The election run is the right time to ask candidates questions on all applicable topics and request clear and firm answers, not generals and beautiful slogans. It is crucial to ask candidates about their attitude towards the right of citizens to choose freely on circumstantial issues, including food matters, so that, immediately after the election, we do not know that our candidate is about to keep us in 15-minute cages and force us to feed on bugs. Of course, for a lofty intent to improve the weather.
Jacek’s SubstackMeanwhile, the ideas of globalists rise opposition not only to us, which the media no longer inform about.
Recently, Robert "Rob" Roos, a Dutch politician and current associate of the European Parliament, spoke out against the European Union's policy of introducing insects into food without clear labelling. Since 2020, the EU has allowed 4 different types of insects as food ingredients. Roos claims that consumers request to know precisely what is in their foods, and that deceptive Latin insect names on the packaging are not clear enough, and alternatively of information they are utilized to obscure the substance and mask the ingredients. “I am definitely not in favour of eating insects,” says Roos. “There are adequate another sources of protein we have been eating for centuries. It's not essential anywhere. Moreover, there are people who may be allergic to insects or incapable to eat them due to their beliefs.”
Roos called for insect-based foods to have clear labels, with a popular insect name mentioned in a simple language and an icon on the packaging to inform consumers that the product contains insects. The Latin name may remain, but as a complement to the above information. He believes that this will prevent unintentional accidental ingestion of insects by those incapable or unwilling to do so.
Roos is not the only individual afraid by EU food policy. Hungary and Italy have late adopted government to defend their citizens from the hidden usage of insects in food, citing concerns about food safety and cultural differences and the right of citizens to choose freely.
Jacek’s SubstackI have late written about the reaction of Italy, while the reaction of Hungarians describes the portal Origo:
https://www.origo.hu/gazdasag/20230324-gazdasag-penz-elelmiszer-rendelet-taplalkozas-rovarok.html
The strict rules have entered into force, food containing insect protein must be marked with “Note! Food contains insect protein!” and must be exhibited separately from another products, announced agriculture minister István Nagy on your social media site .
The Minister stressed that the government besides wanted to defend Hungarian consumers from food containing insect protein, which was allowed by Brussels in the EU, by means of strict rules for product labelling and segregation.
HUNGARY AS THE ONLY associate STATE DID NOT DIE THE measurement OF THE EUROPEAN UNION INTRODUCTIONS AS FOOD AND FOOD INGREDIENTS IN THE EU.
He added that the European Commission is threatening our food traditions and eating habits. so THE AGRICULTURAL MINISTERY CHANGED THE FOOD description REGULATION TO ENSURING CLEAR INFORMATION TO THE CUSTOMERS. Insect protein products should be clearly distinguished and separated on store shelves. Packaging equipment and labels which do not comply with the Regulation may be utilized for another 3 months and products with specified packaging equipment or labels may be placed on the marketplace for a maximum of 3 months. István Nagy besides pointed out that due to the infringement of the amended regulation, no fines would be imposed for the first 90 days.
Those for whom it is crucial to buy food of Hungarian origin do not want to eat insects. Furthermore, Hungarian farmers always supply the Hungarian population with advanced quality, fresh and advanced quality food, and we do not gotta fear food shortages or protein shortages," he stressed.
He besides said that the Regulation does not apply to additives derived from insects which have been widely utilized in the food manufacture so far, but to insects as ingredients.
The EU's decision to introduce insects into food is criticised as part of a globalist human food election control programme. The planet economical Forum has previously suggested that insects can be a solution to global food shortages. Only that there is no shortage of food in Europe, and possible shortages are intentionally produced by the policies of European governments and the Union itself. The best example is the ongoing decommissioning of Dutch agriculture from day to day under the appearance of pollution. First, the same union of subsidies policy led to the conversion of extended agriculture to “modern” intensive, and then ordered its closure due to the fact that it is besides intense. And it does all this by pouring crocodile tears over alleged global food shortages, reportedly caused by the war in Ukraine.
WeEF and the EU advance the eating of worms (sorry, insects) as part of the plan of the large Reset – a planet government based on climate hysteria and totalitarian social control. In a new, improved post-pandemic world, citizens surviving in 15-minute cities will no longer eat meat, but false meat of cancer tissue increasing in a laboratory, worms and artificial food from a factory, and all this can then be consumed with sewage.
The planet economical Forum has repeatedly praised the eating of insects for the sake of the planet. They claim that worms “are rich in protein, healthy fats and vitamins and can be grown on a large scale with minimal trace”.
https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/07/good-grub-why-we-might-be-eating-insects-soon
Again, there is no strong Polish response. Polish MEPs on this subject have nothing to say in the European Parliament, regardless of the political option. In the country, different environments besides close to the ruling party, i.e. having the capacity to act, seem to scare and resent the anticipation of uncontrollable addition of insects to food, but at the same time they are incapable to act decisively like Italy or Hungary. This may be part of the pre-election tactics, but I believe that the introduction of appropriate regulations would give a better propaganda effect. Thus, their deficiency may consequence from inability and deficiency of thought. Poland should besides have regulations requiring clear, legible labelling of insect products and their separation on store shelves. As can be seen from the example of Hungary and Italy, this is simply a comparatively simple measure, a regulation is sufficient. Then people will have the chance to make an informed choice, and they will not know in a fewer years that they ate bugs all the time, so now they can halt there.
How would the alleged pro-European civic environments and the media respond to specified a regulation? Would they criticize, commend, or ignore? Below for fun and rehearsal, how it works, I post a survey. This is just fun, due to the fact that the question is about an alleged reaction to an event that has not occurred and may not happen at all.
Thanks for reading Jacek’s Substack! Subscribe for free to receive fresh posts and support my work.
