An different situation in court. The lawyer asked the justice about judaic background.
.
__________________________
author:Leszek Kraskowski Reporters Online – https://x.com/LKraskowski/status/2045170638977962238/photo/1
@LKraskowski
__________________________
.
An different situation in court – the lawyer asked the justice about judaic origin.
.
Warsaw lawyer Rafał Rogalski, representing the entrepreneur accused of public insults to the judaic population, requested the justice to make a message to the minutes on whether he had judaic origin and Israeli passport.
.
The course of the Thursday proceeding at the Nysa territory Court describes the portal of Nowa Trybuna Opole. A local entrepreneur Maciej S., whose prosecution accuses public insult of ethnicity, sat on the defendants' bench. It was about Facebook posts about among others.policies led by Israel, the authorities of this state and voters voting for Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
.
The suspect is represented by lawyer Rafał Rogalski, who in the past was among others. pJarosław Kaczyński's elnorevist on the Smolensk Disaster. Prior to reading the indictment, the counsel submitted a motion to exclude justice Marius Ulman, who, in his opinion, may be inactive.
.
The lawyer accuses the justice of philosomytism, philoukrainism and promoting LGBT ideology.
.
How the Portal Writes == sync, corrected by elderman ==, an over-hour speech by a lawyer in this case became a circumstantial act of accusation against a justice whose counsel accused philosomytism, philoukrainism, promotion of LGBT ideology, deficiency of respect for public order and political commitment against the right-wing government. The evidence of the case would be entries on the judge's private Facebook profile, photos downloaded from the Internet, and even a shoulder bag in "LGBT colours" utilized by justice Ulman.
.
– The accused Maciej S. is simply a individual active in a number of public initiatives. It operates on social media. He besides spoke of the LGBT movement and it would be inappropriate for the advanced Court to consider specified a case – the mec argued. Rafał Rogalski quoted by the portal.
.
He responded to those words Judge Ulmanwho informed the defender that he would notify the territory Attorney's Council of his message that crosses the free speech line. According to the portal, Counselor Rogalski considered it an effort to intimidate him and continued his speech. – The most crucial issue is philosomysmism and philoukrainism of the advanced Court, due to the fact that this is the case for the first charge in the indictment, or insulting the judaic population. It is unacceptable for a individual with specified bright philosomism and philoukrainism to consider specified a matter. Let the justice state for the evidence whether he is judaic and in which generation. And does he have a passport for Israel? – the lawyer said. #rightIsrael# Jews
__________________________
.
About the same event here too:
.________________
.
In IIIRP/Polin, judaic chauvinism does not be as there is no judaic capitalism and western democracy based on the values of the Talmud:https://www.polsatnews.pl/message/2026-04-22/chamber-zajal-jej-emeryture-didn't-know-that-ma-dlug/
So I wonder about the judge's philoukrainism – but would it not be adequate to accuse Philosemitism itself, after all the cultural composition of the Ukrainian government is rather apparent – ? In fact, the charge of philosemitism would not have been precisely utilized here, it would have been much more appropriate to accuse judaic chauvinism or Zionism – with which our association of WPS in contact with the IIIRP/Polin judiciary has besides faced respective times.
The president
![Płocczanie, harcerze, służby, samorządowcy. Msza św. w intencji Ojczyzny w katedrze [FOTO]](https://static.ddbelchatow.pl/galleries/698af96a-0898-41dd-81be-7336c5929bcd)
