The ongoing crisis of the regulation of law in Poland began many years ago. For warm-up kA short video and a small communicative - https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=10154799197972132
The beginning of the crisis is the end of the PO government period in 2015. After losing the election, the Civic Platform violated the constituency order by changing the bill and calling the judges "in reserve". The Sejm, headed by the Government of the PO, elected 3 judges to the Constitutional Court for positions which were emptied at the end of his word of office and 2 judges for posts which were empty only after the end of this term, unlawfully due to the fact that only the fresh Sejm could make the choice.
It's the PiS era. Ziobro repaired or further corrupted, the choice belongs to readers, the justice system. The coalition led by the PO formed a fresh government that began to apply "law as we realize it". So all the decisions that are beneficial to them are lawful and unfavorable, illegal. An example of 1 of the ultimate Court Chambers. Approval of the elections to the Polish Parliament and the European Parliament by this home was not contested but approval of Nawrocki's election as president is irrelevant, from a legal point of view as they realize them. Minister of Justice Żurek considered that the judgement in the alleged Franc affair issued by the neojudge was lawful for him. The conviction on the murderer of the wife and children issued by the neojudge is invalid and the trial should be repeated.
https://oldy-bob.blogspot.com/2025/11/lawfulness.html
The National Judicial Council is an institution not recognised by the current coalition, which does not hinder coalition Members, attend meetings and collect remuneration for this. "Pecunia non olet" - neither Members nor Minister Zurk.
As far as I know, justice Zurek had been actively active in the "Tour de Constitution" before becoming a minister, gathering and talking to people about civilian rights, principles of equality before the law and another matters contained in the Constitution. I wonder if, as a minister, he interprets the Constitution as it should be, or, like the law, interprets it as "as we realize it." We mean prime minister, government, coalition.
Can president Nawrocki let the explicit stubbornness of "independent" representatives of the 3rd power by Minister Żurek. So far, despite their discontent, they have consistently sought to solve this problem in accordance with the Basic Act and not in accordance with the "law as we realize it" applied by the government side.
