Reading text on ‘hardcore feudalism’, in which the Polish mediate class is expected to be stuck, I cannot defy the impression that it is more about disappointment than a real problem. Disappointing people who believe that it is adequate to “work hard” and “be a decent citizen” to have everything that the 1 who inherits fortunes, properties and holdings has. but possibly not everyone should have all this?
Work isn't everything. There's inactive reason and risk.
Many mediate class representatives have a large sense of claim. “Because I studied due to the fact that I had a debt due to the fact that I never stole.” Is that adequate to be rich? Do they truly believe that they should match the pensioner who skillfully invested in real property a decade ago and now lives up to his lease? Did individual promise them that?
The inheritance and accumulation of capital are the foundations of Western civilization. This is the order of things: those who risked, spared, planned and invested have. And those who anticipate the state to give them everything under "democratic redistribution" will always be frustrated. It's not feudal. It's historical justice.
Life subscription? Very good.
Author Article calls for a fresh economical model "aeronautical". Indeed, present you don't gotta buy a car, an apartment, or even computers. Everything can be rented, subscribed, changed and improve. That's progress. Flexibility, convenience, the ability to test lifestyle without having to have it.
It's not a "new lady." It's a fresh luxury. And whoever has the money is utilizing it. And who doesn't – he can at least look, usage for a while, effort – and dream that he can someday. And possibly she'll grow up to be.
“Nepo kids”? What's the difference between doctor's children and developer's children?
The outrage that rich people’s children have a better start is touchingly naive. It always has been. Always will be. It's the natural order of things. The kid of the intelligence household will inherit competence, contacts and appropriate improvement patterns. A kid of a capital household – resources and investments. In any case, it's about transferring what's most valuable.
Not everyone starts from scratch. But not everyone who starts from scratch has the right to offend the planet that others have better. That would be childish.
Democracy of inequality
And it's good that inequality is getting worse. Contrary to what the left says, equality is not a goal in itself. The sacred peace of the mediate class was an artificial product of the 1960s and 1970s. erstwhile There's no money left.The illusion broke.
What we see present is simply a return to reality. Yes, inequality will grow. Very good. The elite are about to grow. The mediate class is to effort to keep that average. And the mediocre can stay mediocre until they do something about it.
Trade unions and protests? Good luck.
The article was threatened by protests, anger, riots. Does anyone truly think that the modern mediate class, addicted to loans, leases and TikTok, will decision on the barricades? They'd alternatively sign a petition on change.org and compose a Facebook post. But it won't change anything.
The elite will get better. And there's nothing incorrect with that.
Summary: fresh planet order, fresh rules
This is not the end of democracy. This is the end of naive expectations that democracy is simply a wealth equality. It's not. She never was. And it shouldn't be.
Not everyone's gonna be rich. Not everyone deserves a promotion. But anyone can try. And that's what's fair.
Therefore, alternatively of threatening with “neofeudism”, he can realize better: it is not the undoing of civilization. It's her sequel. yet without pretending that we're all the same.
