From time to time, I perceive to statements and analyses of alleged independent journalists. My attention is peculiarly drawn to the statements of people who have their channels on the Internet, including those most visited by listeners on YouTube.
It is apparent that I am most curious in the statements of Poles. I'm comparing them with what Russian and U.S. professionals say. erstwhile I analyse them, I am not limited to their content, to the words spoken.
The wisdom of the phase is the most important
I draw attention to the anturage, the appearance of people speaking their body language. Everything that can make me a complete, reliable image of the message, frequently against the attempts to make a given media message. For it frequently happens that we are simply subjected to perfidious manipulation. For this reason, I avoid the statements of Polish retired generals, national think tanks, etc. It's a waste of my time listening to this kind of production calculated to have a certain impact on the recipient depending on the wisdom of the stage.
Spontaneous statements are an different origin of information on individual channels. In this way, both the personality of the creators of the message and their needs, plans, etc. can be correctly recognized. I'm peculiarly acquainted with the outward appearance of these people. For example, 1 filmed beard strikingly akin to a colonel. Joseph Light, imitation of independent journalism.
The advice of a wise man
I am peculiarly passionate about the statements of ambitious people seeking power, moving in general elections, starting political parties, etc. I closely follow their statements, due to the fact that they frequently present unconventional ways of manipulation. frequently their actions to attract attention come down to another people's diphamation actions, cleverly masked in alleged answers to questions asked to them and saying what they think about a known person, giving alleged good advice, etc.
The palm of precedence in this respect is yours, who in 1 of his broadcasts gave good advice to the head of the Russian MFA. He suggested changing the current Russian Federation ambassador to Poland to another. In another speech for the radio station from Belarus, he gave good advice not to invitation people from Poland to talk, whom he did not care to mention by name. He simply suggested that they were burdened with alcohol illness etc.
He'll go with anyone.
In another of his broadcasts, judging a leading Russian journalist, Vladimir Solovyov, who led, among another things, the Full Contact – Solowow Live programme, threw a disgusting invector. A significant, very crucial example of manipulation of his activities is the inclusion in 1 of the broadcasts of a very short cut from the alleged interview with the doctor Matthew Piskorskiwhere the leader prevented Piskorski from speaking freely to the questions asked. An interview conducted in the kind characteristic of the PRL era, in which he lived and co-organized Colonel Józef Light. From the clipping of this pseudo-intelligence the viewer who does not know Piskorski will draw misconcerned conclusions, contrary to what his real attitude towards the president is. Vladimir Putinia, due to the head of absolutely all country. For Matthew Piskorski is simply a cultural man, respecting the views of another people. Hence, cutting off from the rude provocation leading to this pseudo-interview, he said what is included in this short cut.
In my opinion, he came in this way with the aid of the bearded man, whose goal was to plunge Dr. Matthew Piskorski, due to the fact that the comments put under this pseudo-intelligence in the overwhelming majority are critical to the bearded man. This politician, who is the leader of a certain couch party, asked onegdah with whom he would form a coalition, if they could enter the Sejm, replied: we will enter the coalition with everyone. He failed to scope the Sejm, so he tries to prove otherwise that he is compatible with the current wisdom of the stage.
Eugeniusz Zinkiewicz
