It has only been 10 days since the conclusion of the NATO summit, erstwhile Zelenski decided to take advantage of the anticipation of applying to the Ukrainian-NATO Council to address the issue of the transport of Ukrainian grain by sea, blocked by Russia in consequence to the attack on civilian infrastructure, the Kerchen bridge.
I wonder if Zelenski truly believes in the decision-making possible of the Ukraine-NATO Council, or if he is simply conducting a test to check this potential. On the first day of the NATO summit in Vilnius, on 11 July, Zelenski expressed a profession caused by the reluctance of those who had held meetings to include Ukraine in the NATO structure, writing: “It is unprecedented and absurd erstwhile the time frame is not set either for the invitation or for Ukraine's membership in NATO. There seems to be no readiness to invitation Ukraine to NATO or to make it a associate of the Alliance."
During the dinner, leaders of the countries participating in the summit advised Zelenski that "to cool down and look at the full image of the situationIt’s okay. ” In the analysis of the summit arrangements, the Bloomberg Agency indicated that the leaders of the Allied countries sought in Vilnius "a language that would point to advancement and could be sold to Ukraine as progress", but would not pose a threat of bringing NATO into the war with Russia. specified a candy for Ukraine was an offer to make the Ukraine-NATO Council, which was expected to sweeten the bitterness of the failure of efforts to join the alliance without triggering alliance commitments.
Whether this bitter fact has reached Zelensky or whether he inactive prefers to be stuck in illusions of the extraordinary importance of Ukraine for NATO, it is hard to say. Lesson of Good Education to Zelenski by Ben Wallace. Britain's defence minister worked. Zelenski, in his communication on the initiative of convening the Ukrainian-NATO Council, utilized the word "please" alternatively than "request" and, in the end of the communication, even went to express his gratitude to the countries that announced their support for Ukraine the week after the NATO summit. He mentioned South Korea, Azerbaijan, Sweden, as well as Japan, Australia, Canada, large Britain, USA and Germany.
Poland has already fallen out of the pool of countries to which gratitude is due, due to the fact that firstly, what it has already given, and secondly, the Polish rulers during the election run do not want to sacrifice the material situation threatening the bankruptcy of Polish farmers producing grain on the altar of the victim to Ukrainian grain producers. It's amazing what a dazzling influence Morawiecki's decision has on election run time.
The president of Ukraine Volodymyr Zelenski dismissed 21.07 Vadima Prystajka from the position of Ukrainian ambassador to the UK. Earlier, Prystajko publically referred to Zelenski's words to British defence minister Ben Wallace.
During the NATO Summit in Vilnius, Wallace said that Ukraine should remember that the countries that gave her arms are giving her distant from their own supplies and it would be good for them to see gratitude, not just further demands. "We are not Amazon," noted the British minister and indicated that Ukraine always asks for more, even after receiving another arms party.
In response, Zelenski said: “I think we have always been very grateful to Britain, its Prime Minister and its Minister of Defence, Mr Wallace.... I just don't know what he means, how else should we thank him. Let him text me. We can wake up all morning and thank the minister personally," said Zelenski.
Prystajko expressed the view that sarcasm was heard in Zelenski's words. He added, "I don't think it's healthy sarcasm." Pristajko is 1 of the most experienced Ukrainian diplomats, so his small diplomatic assessment of Zelenski's consequence to Ben Wallace's attention may prove that he had had had had had had adequate of Zelenski's demonstration of sick education in global relations, projecting on the diplomatic activities of the ambassador.
Zelenski's illusions about the anticipation of regaining Crimea in negotiations, due to the fact that the anticipation of rebuilding Crimea is no longer mentioned, sustained gene. Ben Hodges, a erstwhile U.S. military commander in Europe, known for his “jastręb” views and mispronouncement of military activities in Ukraine, as well as his acquaintance with Dr. Jack Bartosiak, president of the Strategy&Future Foundation, which is rightly called "war instigator", where dragging Poland into the war with Russia at hazard of attacking with atomic missiles does not make the slightest impression. What the hell, erstwhile the Russians would fire out of a supply of atomic missiles, and that this would be the case in the Polish cities of Bartosiak is ready to accept “on the chest”, hoping that at that time he would be somewhere on another continent, where he has many influential friends sharing “hawks” views with him. good guy, huh?
However, let's go back to Ben Hodges, who tweeted on July 17: "Why does anyone seriously think that Ukraine should let Russia to keep the Crimea under negotiation?". Hodges responded Anatoli Karlin in a comment under the general's question. "90% of the Crimean people do not want to return to Ukrainian rule. Ukrainian business of Crimea would require large-scale repression and deportation, about which Ukrainians talk openly."
General, is anything brightened in your head by the stagnation of Ukrainian counteroffensive after reading Anatoli Karlin's explanation?
That's why, General, for that matter.
Your Ko Mentator
photo public domain
23.07.2023
