Written by Tyler Durden
Written by Andrew Korybko via substack,
Zelenski yet presented to the Council on Wednesday the first 5 parts of his widely praised "Winning Plan", simultaneously keeping 3 of them a secretAs he himself admitted. Readers can read the full talk Here.and a brief summary of Reuters Here..
When they do both, they'll see that This is unrealistic due to the fact that Ukraine demands: an invitation to join NATO, to jointly capture Russian rockets and to have on its territory a "comprehensive non-nuclear strategical deterrence package" and respective another demands.
_0.jpg)
All 3 are not candidatesto NATO, as the bloc does not want to straight engage in this replacement war, which is feared by its comparatively more pragmatic decision-makers,who inactive decidethat he could easy get out of control and turn into planet War III, so nothing like this has happened yet. This does not mean that their hawk rivals have no chance of changing things, and any speculatively work behind the back of their governments, but simply Zelenski will not get what he wants until it happens.
These figures will most likely stay unchanged, given that they have been in force for more than 2 and a half years, of which he is well aware of what the question is, what he wanted to achieve, making specified demands to his partners, which have already been rejected. It can be argued that he was motivated by 1 of 2 hidden motives: suggest what he wants after a possible "escalation to deescalate" in the close future or sow a grain of the "cius in the back" theory.
When it comes to the first, it can take form nuclear provocation and/or attack on Belarus, while the another was accidentally legitimized 2 days before Zelenski spoke by the Royal United Services Institute in an article about "Ukraine's upcoming betrayal". These scenarios could be avoided if the G7 agreed to meet at least part of his military demands in exchange for allowing the extraction of mineral resources critical to Ukraine, as clearly suggests 1 of the points of his "Winning Plan".
This alleged proposal is based on what G7 promised in May 2022, which remained then analysed here and continued in February 2024. Here., the point is that there is simply a precedent in which he offers his country for sale in exchange for getting what he wants. If these critical mineral riches do not tempt the West to complete at least part of his "Winning Plan", and above explained why they most likely won't, then you will likely escape to 1 of the 2 contingency plans that have been discussed.
The conclusion from what he has just revealed is that of course there are hidden motives, due to the fact that his main demands have already been rejected.
Even the insinuation that Ukraine's critical mineral wealth may be converted to allegedly changing the rules of the game military support may not prompt the West to reconsider due to the fact that He fears an uncontrolled escalation with an armed Russia's atomic weapons.
Therefore, observers should anticipate that it will shortly "escalate to deescalate" or blame Ukraine for the defeat of the West.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://www.zerohedge.com/
