In the Sunday edition of “Guest Events” the presidential candidate Adrian Zandberg He criticized the current government. As he stated, 2 years ago “we were pissed off at fat cats from PiS” and “the thousands of apparatusists who received money from companies (State Treasury – ed.) for nothing". He promised. TuskThat it would be cut, that it would change. Nothing has changed," he said.
The politician besides spoke of "coritarianism", addressing the leader and his erstwhile question. – You say “coritarianism” is an ugly word, so I will usage ugly words to describe ugly phenomena. The corridor that is present is no different than that which was for PiS – he added.
Zandberg: PiS pass is now Platform ID
According to Adrian Zandberg The “treatment” process is inactive ongoing companies of the Treasury, as if it were a place where people could be hired without competence just due to the fact that they have the right organization card."
SEE: A dispute over Nawrocki's writing revealed in Interia. “Saved a Man”, “Primitive Flipper”
– The only thing that's changed is that alternatively of IDs, PiS There's a card now. Platforms, or their appetizer," he stressed.
– Public property management should not look like this," he said.
Zandberg: Prohibition of privatization of the resource should have entered a long time ago
Presidential candidate he besides referred to the thought of the bill New Left to ban the redemption of municipal housing with a bonus. “The ban on privatization of the stock should have entered a long time ago, this is an apparent standard,” he said Zandberg.
– This task will be if they convince their government colleagues to accept it. The problem is that erstwhile it comes to ability SLD to convince anything, but to appoint 1 or another man as a chair (...), is nothing, he stressed.
To the question leading up to “malignant” usage against New Left the names of the SLD, Zandberg he replied that ‘it is de facto overdressed SLDas regards the structures of politicians.’
– They have our support if it comes, even if it comes to the vote in Sejm This project, he said.
– I'd just encourage it if something was going to be a government project, so that it would not just appear at a press conference, but actually at a vote in Sejm And to make certain there were most. It is not about organising a press conference, it is about voting on any solutions," he stressed.
– We saw what it looked like in the case of the moronic thought of attacking public wellness finance, which was voted against by the mentioned colleagues from fresh Left," he suggested.
== sync, corrected by elderman ==
