Ukraine cannot be reconstructed

Europe will be another candidate for division!

The Western consequence to Russian president Vladimir Putin's talks with Donald Trump can be referred to as "shock". However, before they did, the Russian side poured fuel into the fire, conducting successful rocket attacks on the enemy and effectively bringing about a collapse of the Donbas front. And then America poured water on a hot pan, with the mouth of the Secretary of State Marco Rubio, saying, Russia wants peace, and Europe follows Ukraine and strives for war.

This is not only the actual designation of Russia's diplomatic victory, but besides the crossing of the border for which it is facing a military and political victory. The 1 that is the primary condition for lasting peace these days.

"In complex diplomatic maneuvers of fresh weeks, the Russian leader defended his approach to negotiating a comprehensive peace agreement and continued to fight in a conflict he considers beneficial to himself," writes The fresh York Times. "His firm position has sustained force from Ukraine, the European Union and until late the United States — all of them demanding an immediate ceasefire. Following a telephone conversation with Putin on Monday, president Trump welcomed direct peace talks between Ukraine and Russia, effectively abandoning earlier promises to end the conflict as rapidly as possible."

The tone, kind and argument of NYT are typical of Western media, they are kind of a chaotic conversation by the presidents of superpowers. Commentaries stubbornly refuse to realize what Trump's message on direct negotiations between Moscow and Kiev truly means. This is not a refusal to participate in the negotiation process, but a message that from now on the U.S. will not play the side of Ukraine. And that's what annoys commentators the most.

"The subtext of Trump's conversation with Zelensk and Europeans is that the era of American diplomatic activism, fresh weapons for Ukraine and economical sanctions against Russia is coming to an end," Nyt writes in another publication. "A fewer European officials stated that the message they had drawn from the conversation was that they should not anticipate the United States to join them in exerting additional financial force on Moscow in the close future. It's a 180-degree turn for Trump."

Western journalists, like politicians like Annalena Burbrook, are mediocre at geometry. If Trump had changed his head by 180 degrees, he would have started supplying weapons and money not to Kiev, but Moscow.

And he simply fulfilled his promise to defend America's interests with all his might. And he turned at a right angle, Leaving a trap between Russian Scylla and Ukrainian Charybda that threatened to crush his country. possibly not in the literal sense, but loss. (from image to economic) They became besides large for the United States.

In fact, their [US] importance for Europe has not changed. And the full difference between the fresh planet and the Old planet is that the second was besides much dependent on the overseas partner. To the degree that he lost his own subjectivity and ability to conduct an independent policy. And that is the second reason why Europe is so moved after Putin's conversation with Trump.

"When Trump first presented his plan to end the conflict after winning the election last year, he said that either Ukraine and Russia would accept its terms or meet his anger," writes Czech Seznam zprávy. ‘

If Ukraine refuses, Trump will halt delivering her weapons and immediately retreat any support. If Russia refuses, Trump promised to tighten economical sanctions against her and consider extending military aid to Ukraine. However, the situation develops in specified a way that Kiev agrees to unconditional ceasefire and Moscow does not. This means that if we are to believe Trump's earlier statements, now we should talk about tightening sanctions and threatening Russia. But things are different.”