Mykhailo Lebedev was just 16 years old erstwhile Russians captured his city, having subjected it to a relentless run of bombardment lasting 3 months, razing residential areas, hospitals, schools and universities alongside killing tens of thousands of residents. An orphan, Mykhailo was forbidden from leaving his private guardian, due to the fact that he was a minor. “Mariupol, it was like another world,” Mykhailo recalls. “You saw people walking with satisfied faces, and you were happy to walk along the street. And now there are almost no people in the city, and you see everything is destroyed.”
He attended eighth grade at Mariupol School No. 38. During the Russian business he was briefly forced to survey at another school as his was 1 of any 52 that were damaged or destroyed in the city. His school was later restored, and the children returned. However, the circumstances were very different.
The teenager said that at School No. 38, the Ukrainian language stopped being taught and Russian propaganda was widespread. Textbooks were replaced, and teachers were forced to talk about how the Russian Federation came to “liberate” Ukrainians. “Ukraine is bad, Russia came to “liberate” you, that now everything will be good, everything will be good, everything will be wonderful,” he said. Meanwhile, Russians were establishing artillery positions on the school grounds to shoot at Ukrainian soldiers (and which no uncertainty created another level of intellectual distress to both teachers and students). “The Russian army drove onto the school grounds. We had a immense field there – they brought in tanks and armoured personnel carriers and started shelling Azovstal,” he said.
Mykhailo’s sister, Anastasia Lebedeva, asked Anton Bilay, the manager of a college in Mariupol, to aid her brother leave. He contacted the Ukrainian Children’s Rights Network, a non-governmental organization, and the Ukrainian Ministry for the Reintegration of Occupied Territories, and together they helped the boy leave the occupied territory. He arrived in Khmelnytskyi on Christmas Eve 2023.
Mykhailo is just 1 of many Ukrainian teenagers who resisted Russia’s strategy of indoctrination and intimidation in the occupied territories, and despite crucial threats, were able to return to free Ukraine. 3 of these escapees shared their testimonies with “The Reckoning Project”. They provided further information about the nature of Russian indoctrination in schools, in both the temporarily occupied territories, and Russia itself.
Illustration by Anastasia Faizova
The business system
Russia has systematically and intentionally been attempting to erase the very thought of Ukrainian national identity and culture. This has been actual in the occupied territories of Crimea and Donbas since 2014, and across a wider area following the full-scale invasion of 2022. The business authorities have clearly been committing acts in areas under their control which are prohibited in global law – including in the genocide convention – specified as forcible transfer. Children are subjected to these Russian methods seemingly aimed at destroying their national group, and nowhere is this more evident than in Russia’s re-education campaigns.
In Ukraine’s temporarily occupied territories, Russia has been purposefully erasing Ukrainian language, culture and identity while promoting a cult of war, glorifying the erstwhile USSR (at School No. 65, which Russians destroyed, and then rebuilt, occupiers erected a large Lenin monument), and installing teachers who frequently bully Ukrainian students (Russian propaganda has been calling Ukrainians “Nazis” since 2014). School administrations rapidly effort to eradicate all traces of Ukrainian identity, while imposing Russian as the language of instruction. teacher accounts provided to The Reckoning task indicate that educators in the temporarily occupied territories have been subjected to utmost forms of intimidation to force them to comply with the business authorities’ educational demands. Meanwhile, Russian state propaganda has continually dehumanized Ukrainians by denying that their national identity is even separate from that of Russia’s – all while attempting to erase the very aspects that make it different. A key prong of Russia’s coercive tactics is violence: the threat of force and willingness to usage violence. Russia’s torture chambers in Kherson, confederate Ukraine, in 2022 were part of a “calculated plan to terrorise, subjugate and destruct Ukrainian opposition and destruct Ukrainian identity,” according to an global consortium.
Russia’s mass kidnapping of Ukrainian children is widely known, with both the Russian leader Vladimir Putin and Russia’s commissioner for children’s rights, Maria Lvova-Belova, both wanted by the ICC for the unlawful deportation and transfer of tens of thousands of Ukrainian children to Russia. In August, it emerged that Russia had created a catalogue of stolen Ukrainian kids for Russian families to adopt (and “Russify”), many of whom were orphaned erstwhile Russia killed their parents. Sadly, any malleable youngsters who grow up in the temporarily occupied territories and who were re-educated by Russia, have been coerced and manipulated into fighting for those who destroyed their lives, with widespread reports of abducted children being prepared for combat roles. 1 Reckoning task interviewee, born in the city of Khartsyzk, Donetsk region, graduated from school in 2020 erstwhile the area was already under Russian occupation. They had to survey the Russian language and a subject titled “History of the Fatherland”, with the Ukrainian language removed from the curriculum after the sixth or seventh grade. He was deployed to the front lines in early 2024, despite assurances that he would not be sent on combat missions.
These are just fresh examples of Russia’s effort to compression any sense of Ukrainianness out of the country’s youth to further its long-term imperial ambitions. Russia did not full make its methods of oppression from the murder, imprisonment, deportation and starvation campaigns of the USSR. After all, Moscow’s attempts to eradicate and subjugate nations on its periphery has been ongoing for centuries: tsarist Russia banned any Lithuanian-language publications in the Latin alphabet back in the 1800s as part of its run of eradicating national identity and Russification policies to guarantee cultural assimilation. In the 1920s and 1930s, the forced starvation of Ukrainians resulted in the deaths of millions, contributing to Raphael Lemkin coining the concept of genocide.
A Russian strategy document signed by Putin, and published on November 25, explicitly laid out the country’s intentions to force those located in the temporarily occupied territories to become Russian, by adopting “additional measures to strengthen overall Russian civic identity” there. The aim is to guarantee “no little than 95 percent” of the country’s population identify as Russian by 2036 (Russia claims that the east Ukrainian lands it invaded are its “historical territories”).
“I want a Ukrainian passport”
While facing these pressures at school, Mykhailo was besides being worn down by his fraught home life, harassed by his pro-Russia guardian. “When the Russian authorities came, she started telling me that the Russian Federation is very good, that Ukraine and America will shortly be gone,” Mykhailo said. He found it hard to believe. erstwhile the Russians destroyed Mariupol, he besides lost his only remaining household nearby: his 2 older sisters managed to flee to western Ukraine. Then, in 2023 his school started demanding he change his Ukrainian papers for Russian papers, one more time bringing him into conflict with his pro-Russian guardian.
“She wanted to change the papers to Russian ones, but she couldn’t do it without me,” he said. “But she knew that I had sisters who had left for Ukraine, and she knew my position. erstwhile she started talking about changing passports, I told her categorically: “No, I won’t change it. I want to have a Ukrainian passport.” The guardian threatened him with the police, and his school administration threatened to withhold his ninth grade certificate. He besides experienced a top-down effort to encourage peer force among students through involving young men and women in youth movements specified as Yunarmiya, Movement of the Firsts, and others. Mykhailo recalled that fellow classmates were pressuring another schoolchildren to join the “Young Guard” of Russia’s ruling “United Russia” party, as well as the aforementioned “Movement of the Firsts”.
Subjected to intellectual abuse at home, bullying from teachers at school, lessons polluted with Russian propaganda, and peer pressure, Mykhailo naturally had a very, very hard time, and started skipping classes. His intellectual wellness deteriorated and he recalls becoming very “tired”. “I didn’t want to stay in this house,” he said. Despairing, he entered a local vocational college, where he could live in dormitories.
Children like Mykhailo are not so easy broken, with their age, patriotic upbringing, experiences and memories from before the occupation, and net access all working in their advantage (though media from outside is increasingly hard to access as Ukrainian net providers have been replaced by Russian equivalents). Sometimes the Russian indoctrination systems encourage that which they effort to prevent, strengthening teenagers’ patriotism and love for their native language.
Article 50 of the 4th Geneva Convention (1949), to which the USSR was a signatory, stipulates that occupying powers should guarantee that children who are orphaned or separated from their parents, be educated “if possible, by persons of their own nationality, language and religion”. Russia, considered a successor state to the USSR, is inactive bound by the obligations set out in this treaty – obligations which it is clearly failing to meet. Russia is besides a organization to the Convention on the Rights of the Child. Articles 28 and 29 state that state parties must admit the right of a kid to education, “and guarantee that education fosters respect for the cultural identity, language, and values of the child’s country of origin”. Russia is not honouring this either.
“I am not obliged to stand under this flag”
Valeriia Halych and her parent Nataliia were separated for a year and a half, initially as the consequence of Russia’s business of villages in east Ukraine, and then erstwhile her pro-Russian father forced the girl and her older brother to leave for Belgorod, confederate Russia, where they entered local colleges. 2 days prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion, Nataliia took her children to her mother-in-law’s home in the village of Yamy, Luhansk region, believing they would be safer there than in their home city of Severodonetsk, to which she returned. Yamy was swiftly occupied, and Nataliia had to climb high-rise buildings while under fire in the city to communicate with her children. She suffered 2 contusions and 1 wound in her attempts to scope them, and yet they lost contact.
Illustration by Anastasia Faizova
The children attended a local school for 2 weeks, where Valeriia said Ukrainian textbooks were replaced by Russian ones, and they were forced to learn the anthem of the Russia-established “Luhansk People’s Republic” (LPR), while Russian past and the Russian language were added as mandatory subjects. Ukrainian past was removed from the school curriculum, and the Ukrainian language limited to grades 10 and 11. The school displayed the flags of the alleged LPR, the Russian Federation, and the Red Army triumph banner. Later, the children were transferred to online distance learning.
In August 2023, the children’s father, Oleksiy Halych, arrived from Poland, got Russian passports for his boy and daughter and took them to Belgorod, Russia. Nataliia Halych said that her ex-husband had previously fought for the LPR, which is viewed as a terrorist organization by Ukraine. Valeriia did not want to go. She cried and begged to be sent to territories controlled by Ukraine. However, her father was inexorable. He took the children to Belgorod, Russia and forced them to enter colleges. Valeriia studied at Belgorod Mechanical and Technological College as a fashion designer, and stayed there from September to October 2023. According to Valeriia’s mother, Ukrainian children were constantly bullied and humiliated in Russian educational institutions, and the degree of propaganda intensified. “You will be taught, raised – and you will become Russians. This is your motherland now. Ukraine is not a state, subhuman, and Ukrainians are pigs,” teachers told Valeriia.
Every Monday, college students were forced to sing the Russian anthem, and rise the Russian flag. They were besides forced to undertake weekly lessons called “conversations about the important”, during which Russian culture was imposed on students. “Russian teachers called the war a peculiar military operation, they said that Ukrainian textbooks were written untruthfully. They said that Ukraine started the war, and Russia was not conducting any military operations on the territory of Ukraine. They told us that Russia only “rescues” (this is their favourite idea), it simply protects its territories, they do not contact civilians, they only attack military facilities,” Valeriia stated.
The girl did not like the educational institution. In college, all the textbooks were in Russian, and while she was studying fashion, lessons on the Russian language, Russian literature, Russian history, OBZH (life safety protection), and the “Great Patriotic War” (Russia’s name for the Second planet War) were all mandatory. During OBZH classes, she was taught to disassemble and assemble an automatic device gun. Valeriia Halych had problems in college due to her pro-Ukrainian beliefs. She openly told them, “I do not request this anthem, I will not sing it and I am not obliged to stand under this flag.”
Valeria said that students were sent to “intern” in factories, sewing clothes for the Russian military, and making camouflage nets. They received school awards for what was fundamentally free labour for the Russian military. Ukraine is besides organization to the 4th Geneva Convention, which means its civilians, who “at a given minute and in any manner whatsoever, find themselves, in case of a conflict or occupation, in the hands of a organization to the conflict or Occupying Power of which they are not nationals”, number as protected persons. Article 51 stipulates that protected persons may not be compelled to service in “armed or auxiliary forces” while “no force or propaganda which aims at securing voluntary enlistment is permitted”. Protected persons may besides not be compelled to work unless they are over the age of 18 – which Valeriia was not.
When Nataliia discovered that her children were in Russia, she naturally tried to get them back, which proved hard under the draconian nature of their dormitories, where they were forbidden to communicate in Ukrainian. On her first attempt, Nataliia found individual to take her daughter to the border, but she was not allowed through unaccompanied by an adult. She was 17 at the time. After a further failed effort to get her back via Belarus, which caused Nataliia to almost break down completely, she yet made it to Warsaw, and returned to Kyiv on October 16th 2023.
While she yet finished her 11th grade education remotely from Kyiv, she opted not to enter higher education and take a break after her prolonged period of stress. Prior to Russia’s full-scale invasion she had planned to survey abroad, but her experiences helped her realize how crucial it was to her to survey in Ukraine. “I besides decided to talk Ukrainian. At first, it was very hard to switch, due to the fact that I had communicated in Russian all my life. But now I think that language is very important, both our genetic code and our nationality,” Valeriia said.
“I don’t want to be Russian”
One youngster, Kyrylo Kuzmenko (his last name and first name have been changed for safety reasons), likewise endured his household being torn apart by Russia and attempts to indoctrinate him while erasing his national heritage. 12 years old at the beginning of the invasion, Kyrylo lived with his grandparents in a village in Luhansk region as his parent Larysa (also a pseudonym) was serving with the military in a close city, though she frequently visited. Just like Nataliia and Valeriia, parent and boy were separated after the full-scale invasion, and Larysa could not enter the occupied territories.
“You know, it was tears and despair,” she said. “Everyone there knew that I was a military woman. And erstwhile the territories were occupied, it was clear that anything could happen to the child. And there was no way to choice him up, due to the fact that the road was closed, due to the fact that the full household are military service people.” In September 2022, Kyrylo was allowed to attend a lyceum in the occupied territory with Ukrainian documents. However, the following year the school administration began to request an LPR-issued birth certificate, threatening him with an orphanage due to the fact that he did not live with authoritative guardians. The headteacher told him, “if you misbehave in class, you will go to an orphanage,” Larysa said. erstwhile the school learned that she was in the military, teachers began to punitively lower Kyrylo’s grades – even if his answers were identical to his classmates.
Illustration by Anastasia Faizova
As was the case with Valeriia and Mykhailo, classes were taught in Russian, the Ukrainian language and textbooks were swiftly eradicated, and children were made to sing the anthem of the Russia-established LPR, with many children actively active in the Yunarmiya movement.
“Children aged 12 to 13 wear military uniforms: they have uniforms, berets, everything,” said Larysa. Kyrylo was besides asked to join this movement, but her boy said “no” immediately. “He is simply a patriot of Ukraine. I frequently requested on the phone, “son, don’t say anything [anti-Russian] until I take you.” He loves Ukraine so much. I brought him a blue and yellow heart with an embroidered pattern earlier, so he took it over all the borders, due to the fact that that heart was given to him by his mother.” The business authorities wanted to remove Kyrylo from his grandparents, with his grandma being repeatedly summoned to their “social services”.
Russia has a long track evidence of separating Ukrainian children from their families. A fresh report from the Yale School of Public Health’s Humanitarian investigation laboratory noted that Russia’s programme of “forcible deportation, transfer, coerced adoption and fostering of Ukraine’s children” provides a “substantial basis” for violations of the 1949 Geneva Conventions, the Rome Statute (war crimes and crimes against humanity), and the UN Convention of the Rights of the kid (CRC).
Larysa’s first effort to get him back was in autumn 2023, but she was unsuccessful, and he had to go into hiding. yet he made it to Poland, after going through Russia and Belarus, landing back in Ukraine in December 2023. “At first, he had quite a few fear in his eyes after what he experienced there. At first, he lived in anticipation that they might come and take him back to the occupation,” Larysa said. He never doubted his devotion to Ukraine. “When he came here, he came home. My boy said, “I don’t want to be Russian.”” Like Valeriia, he made a conscious effort to control to Ukrainian after spending a chunk of his education forced to usage Russian. However, he has no military aspirations – his parent suspects, due to his traumatic experience of war. Kyrylo now lives in western Ukraine, and just started the ninth grade.
Forced into hiding
Children who end up in the temporarily occupied territories frequently receive small information from parents that are desperately trying to scope them, or even the very fact that their
loved ones are trying to contact them – sending them further into despair. “The business authorities are doing everything they can to limit any contact with the territory controlled by Ukraine. And erstwhile the children return, they are very amazed that they were being searched for and waited for, due to the fact that they did not have this information,” Nataliia Mezina, a scientist at the NGO Ukrainian kid Rights Network, told The Reckoning Project. Her NGO is actively active in ensuring the safe return of children from the occupied territories.
When they do manage to return, many are overwhelmed with emotion. “For children with patriotic views, gathering the Ukrainian flag is simply a very delicate moment. First of all, they dream of continuing their education and rebuilding Ukraine,” she said.
Illustration by Anastasia Faizova
Some children are besides forced to go into hiding for much longer than Kyrylo did. “For children with pro-Ukrainian beliefs, the business is simply a hostile, violent environment,” she said. “I know quite a few cases erstwhile teenage boys hid in the business for 2 or 3 years and did not go to school … they tried to leave at any cost so as not to join the ranks of the Russian business army.”
Living under business is an intensely traumatic experience for people with pro-Ukraine beliefs, with specified children feeling constantly under threat. Upon return there is simply a long reintegration process, “to make up not only for educational needs, but besides for lost opportunities for development,” Nataliia Mezina said.
Aliide Naylor and Aleksander Palikot contributed to this report
Nataliia Sirobab is simply a Ukrainian writer and investigator with The Reckoning Project.
New east Europe is simply a reader supported publication. delight support us and aid us scope our goal of $10,000! We are nearly there. Donate by clicking on the button below.
![Papież Leon XIV odwiedził Błękitny Meczet w Stambule [ZDJĘCIA]](https://cdn.wiadomosci.onet.pl/1/94sk9lBaHR0cHM6Ly9vY2RuLmV1L3B1bHNjbXMvTURBXy8zOGE2ZDA1YzcxMjAyN2EyZjE2Y2VmZWYzNGEzNmRiMC5qcGeSlQMAzNDNB9DNBGWTBc0JYM0GQN4AAqEwB6ExBA)
