Progress organization (Fremskrittspartiet, FrP) She had just achieved the top success in her past – she gained about 24% of the vote in the 2025 parliamentary elections, making her the second biggest political force in the country. It is simply a clear signal that the course chosen by Sylvia Listhaug's leader has hit the expectations of a large part of society. Not only did the organization effectively receive Conservative organization voters (14%), pushing them to 3rd place, but it strengthened itself as a voice typical discontent with the current order. erstwhile again, the top voters assessed the ruling Labour organization (28%), which has the chance to hold power by forming a coalition with smaller left parties.
Today's FrP is simply a group rooted in anti-etatistic tradition, but capable of adapting to modern challenges – from mass immigration to the wellness crisis to interior security. Her communicative is simply a communicative of rebellion against the establishment, forming political identity and maturing into real power.
Economy – individual freedom and strong infrastructure
Economics from the beginning was the most crucial pillar of the thought organization of Progress. Its programme is based on the belief that national prosperity is not due to redistribution of goods, but to hard work by citizens, low taxes and rational management. FrP opposes inheritance tax, property taxation and many another charges, which in her opinion are a form of punishing citizens for success and saving. The organization calls for full liquidation of the property value tax, stressing that having a home should not be the basis for fiscal burdens. It besides opposes the alleged "green taxes" introduced under the slogan of combating the climate crisis, recognising them as a tool for ideological force and artificial restraint of the economy.
A peculiarly crucial point is the request for a greater usage of the oil fund for infrastructure investments. According to FrP, raising billions in the reserve fund makes no sense erstwhile citizens wait months for operations and local communities do not have access to modern schools or digital infrastructure. The organization wants to simplify budgetary rules and allocate more resources to the improvement of road networks, broadband internet, hospitals and nursing homes. In addition, FrP calls for a simplification in bureaucracy, not only in terms of the number of officials, but besides of regulations and forms. all citizen and entrepreneur should be able to easy registry business, settle taxes or get essential permits.
Immigration and integration – the state must know its limits
One of the most clear pillars of the FrP programme remains immigration policy. The organization has for years been demanding a simplification in the influx of people from non-European countries and effective integration of those already in Norway. It calls for asylum in Norway to be obtained only by those who meet the strict criteria of the Geneva Convention. The remainder should be legally deported. FrP opposes the granting of residence on the basis of alleged humanitarian reasons, indicating that this has led to many abuses in the past. The organization underlines that the right to reside in Norway is not a privilege, but a work for the observance of law, values and social standards. Equally firm the organization takes a stand towards those who commit crimes. Foreigners sentenced to more than 3 months should be expelled from the country. Authorities should have the full right to deport persons who pose a threat to public security.
On the another hand, the organization supports humanitarian aid within the UN, peculiarly in countries affected by war, disasters and crisis. FrP supported the reception of refugees from Ukraine after the Russian invasion in 2022, showing that it differentiates geopolitical situations and does not follow automation.
Health and care – patient system, not for bureaucracy
The organization has repeatedly stressed that the Norwegian wellness strategy requires deep reform. Queues for treatments, deficiency of access to specialists and overburdening hospitals are the consequence of mediocre management and state monopoly. The organization so supports the improvement of the private sector in wellness care as complementary to the public. alternatively of creating fresh levels of administration, FrP wants to redirect funds to circumstantial objectives specified as expanding infirmary beds, hiring nurses and upgrading diagnostic equipment. It besides points to the request to build fresh nursing homes and to give older people the chance to choose the form of care in real terms, including in the private sector.
The organization points out that caring for seniors is not only a medical issue but besides a moral one. The State has a work to guarantee decent ageing conditions.
Education and culture – order, freedom of choice and realism
FrP believes that the school should be a place of discipline and learning alternatively than pedagogical experiments. He demands that the authority of teachers be restored, that grades can be utilized from grade 5 and that excessive explanation in vocational schools be reduced. The organization supports beginning private schools, especially those run by foundations, spiritual organizations or parents. The key choice is that parents should have the right to decide in which environment their children learn.
In terms of culture, FrP wants to limit state grants to artists. Art should be funded by viewers, not by officials. The money from the budget is to go where there is genuine social interest, not ideological favouritism.
Law and order – safety in the first place
FrP puts citizens' safety at the forefront of its agenda. It demands an increase in the number of police officers, especially in smaller towns, and a more visible presence of services in public spaces. It besides calls for tougher penalties for offenders, especially those related to violence, sexuality and kid safety. The victims are to be the center of attention, not the perpetrator. Therefore, FrP advocates the appointment of a Ombudsman for victims of crime, who will represent the interests of the victims.
The party's agenda besides includes requests related to the separation of religion from state services. Police officers should not wear spiritual or political symbols. Uniform is simply a symbol of the state, not the identity of the individual.
Foreign policy – sovereignty and realism
Since 2016, FrP has opposed Norway's membership of the European Union. It believes that European integration limits the sovereignty of states and transfers power to a level that is detached from citizens. The organization supports the European economical Area, thanks to which Norway has access to the interior market. Strong relations with NATO and the US are also foundation of FrP's abroad policy. The organization supports the increase in defence spending, especially in the context of the war in Ukraine. In March 2025, she supported an increase in defence spending to 3% of GDP.
FrP has for years been unequivocally supporting Israel and calling for the transfer of the Norwegian embassy to Jerusalem. In conflicts in the mediate East, he takes sides with the judaic state, cutting off from the anti-Israeli demands of the left. This is simply a typical attitude of Western right-wing parties that see an ally in Israel in the fight against Islamism.
Elections 2025 – a breakthrough moment
The September 8 parliamentary elections brought the advancement organization a consequence that she could only dream of a fewer years ago. With 24% of the vote and a second place in Storting, FrP proved to be a force capable of co-determining and shaping Norwegian reality. Thanks to the clearness of the program, the coherence of communication and the effectiveness of the leader, the organization gained the assurance of both the voters from the periphery and the mediate class in larger cities. She responded to the social fatigue of compromises, the illogical immigration policy and the deficiency of consistency in management.
It's not a protest organization anymore. It is simply a organization ready to regulation – without revolution, but with courage to say what works and what does not.
