Letters to the European Parliament (PE) elections, a future script for political "experts" from ‘special tasks’ and career leaders of the current government. This could be summed up by the current situation in which political scenes match the game of grey participants, stylized on the first colors of the political scene.
The “Elects” of the Nation
Boris Budka I'm not going there... and then I'm going there. The Prime Minister shall not be refused), Bartłomiej Sienkiewicz (quote: The European Parliament is simply a political cemetery and I am not going there...and in a minute placed as the 1 on the list of Małopolska and Świętokrzyskie), Krzysztof Hetman, with the deficiency of simple economics base, which claims that the "Apartment for Start" programme will not contribute to the emergence in housing prices or the last Marcin Kierwinski and his laughter, laughter of the ridiculer about the plebeic expression of the driver's face of the TIR, mocking the naivety of his constituents erstwhile he found out that he was the 1 on the list of KO capital city Warsaw.
Looking at these elections, you can see clearly how seemingly uninterested candidates abruptly change their face, as if they had a hidden ace in the form of a ready-made plan for the EP gathering alternatively of working in the country. They did nothing (except, of course, disassembling Poland), their voters trusted them, and they, alternatively of working for them, openly laughter at their faces reasoning how naive they are, and above all, that they will believe all lie they have.
Of course, let us not forget the duo of "heroes" i.e. Dariusz Joński and Krzysztof Szczerba. Sherlock Holmes and Dr Watson of the Polish political scene, undefeated trackers promoted by the presently ruling coalition. Both are chairmen of investigation committees, where they showed their ineptness and incompetence, and the latter, who signed under the alleged windmill insert, not knowing that he signed it. How much does it should be below the MIN line, the oil level of the head to do something like that? I ask myself that question many times, and I am frequently incapable to find answers. The only thing that affects me is the empty laughter, but besides the disbelief of how much the voters of specified individual are able to look themselves in the mirror and claim that Poland and its good is most important...and truly vote for individual like that?
Mass manipulation
On the 1 hand, we see this spectacle of cynicism, where politicians laughter in the face of their voters, showing how easy it is to manipulate masses. Everything starts with banal promises, like those concerning the price of gasoline after 5.19, which rapidly decision from the simplification phase to the deficiency of impact on the marketplace (an answer from Donald Tusk that as Prime Minister does not affect the price of gasoline).
Until we yet come to absurdity, where 100 concretes are simply an illusion, and the ambitions of politics become its shield (translating Donald Tusk that as Prime Minister he was besides ambitious, that all this wanted to accomplish in 100 days... truly voters, are you so naive that you believe in specified a translation, individual who acts like a pathological liar? If that's the case, woe to this nation, who is so naive... let me just remind you that Prime Minister Tusk has ruled twice and Doskolane knows how all this government equipment works.
Among this chaos is besides a figure specified as Luke Kohut and his statement, which later matingly tried to whitewash that it was ripped out of context. It didn't! due to the fact that he wrote it himself. I have Polish citizenship, but I am not Polish.
I have Polish citizenship, but I am not Polish – Łukasz Kohut
And although this discrimination may seem subtle to some, to many it becomes a stone of images within social trust. After all, how can you trust a individual who betrays his own beliefs by claiming to be individual he's not? This question, which is floating in the air, like an unspoken accusation, leaves irresistibly unstable in our society.
However, this question should become a starting point for deeper reflection. A individual who openly admits that he is not a Pole does not deserve trust or a mandate to represent the interests of Poland! specified a confession must rise doubts and awaken our vigilance. "Don't betray the Polish state's right!" - this could appear in public space and in the heads of some, and rightly so.
The question is whether we can trust those who conceal their loyalty and actual convictions. This is not only a question of national identity, but besides a question of fundamental trust, which should accompany anyone who stands in the political arena. After all, how can we anticipate individual to defend our interests if they don't identify with them themselves? This question not only hangs in the air, but should lead us to a critical analysis of who truly represents our values and ideas in politics.
A liar will always lie due to the fact that that's his nature
But what is most alarming is not only the fact that politicians lie, but besides the fact that people proceed to be deceived by believing in promises that sometimes lose their credibility at the start. The definition of a liar is clear - the tendency to lie is an integral part of its nature. It's like a virus, patiently waiting for a convenient minute to attack and weaken social foundations. Lies become a virus that infects minds and election decisions, impersonating promises of change, and in fact serving only own and organization interests.
In this scenario, society becomes a host to a political parasite that preys on trust, drawing energy from it for further manipulation. increasing circles of manipulation intersect social tissues, creating always greater divisions between promises and reality. It's a grotesque farce, where words become nothing but empty sounds, and choices become just a race of rats, where the 1 who can manipulate emotions and promises more efficiently wins.
And finally, shake off that amok.
So this is Europe, where the elections to the Euro-Parliament become a spectacle full of courtesy, but lacking crucial content. Is there inactive area for genuine politics in this maze of political manipulation, based on trust and integrity? Time will show whether society will be able to learn from these experiences and defy manipulation, or stay trapped in lies and delusions, losing religion in political reality.
