Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni and left-wing leader Elly Schlein, political opponents in almost everything, agreed on 1 thing: not to usage artificial intelligence to put words they never spoke into their rivals' mouths. It's a uncommon pact beyond divisions, and at the same time a quiet confession as to how fragile the fact has become in the election campaign. is simply a akin truce even possible over the Vistula River?
A proposal from paper breaks
The pulse came from the left. Democratic organization Secretary Elly Schlein in the paper "Il Foglio" proposed a "non-aggression pact": in the face of the election campaign, all political forces should commit themselves not to usage artificial intelligence to attribute imaginary words and deeds to opponents. erstwhile the same paper was asked for the opinion of the Prime Minister, the answer was immediate. According to Giorgia Meloni, “this is the subject I raised first. I agree."
Meloni: Deepfake is simply a weapon
The Prime Minister's approval was not accidental. Meloni has for a long time warned against the abuse of digital tools. As early as May 2026, she called Deepfaki dangerous, due to the fact that they were capable of “swindling, manipulating and hitting everyone”, and she repeated this thought at the beginning of July during the UIL Union office Congress. For the chief of Fratella d'Italia, the pact is so a natural extension of the position it held before the subject hit the banners of the opposition.
Right and left on 1 side
Schlein went on to sign what Pope Leon XIV said about artificial intelligence. She expressed the belief that, with the right rules and due care, Italy could find its way to growth, productivity and fresh opportunities. The Papal encyclical “Magnifica humanitas” is full devoted to this technology. She was born, as reported, from talks with scientists and engineers, from the concern of politicians seeking fair standards, parents and teachers afraid about the future of young people, but besides from worrying accounts of algorithm abuses and failure of human cause.
Regulations pursuit technology
The Italian pact forms part of a wider European effort to subdue this technology. The European Union has adopted an artificial intelligence regulation, the alleged AI Act, which, among another things, imposes an work to description machine-generated content, but the law naturally chases technology slower than it develops. Election campaigns around the planet have already learned about the taste of pre-recorded candidates and false statements sent out in fresh days before the vote. Therefore, the voluntary commitment of politicians themselves, although not replacing hard law, is simply a faster shield than subsequent legislative procedures. In this sense Rome is sending a signal that it is not essential to wait for Brussels to do so for us to defend the fact in the campaign.
Lesson for Poland
The Italian truce is worthy of attention over the Vistula River. Artificial intelligence, which can make a credible recording of unspoken words, hits the very foundation of public debate: trust in what we see and hear. If the 2 disengaged sides of the Italian scene can accept that certain tools are simply not used, then the threat is real, not imagined. The question is whether Polish politics, equally divided, will get to a akin maturity before the first prepared video can overtake the election balance.
Source: liberoquotidiano
![Poles have revealed who they criticize most frequently in conversations with their loved ones. The consequence may come as a surprise [POLL]]()
