Michele de Pascale, president of Emilia-Romania of the Democratic Party, opposed the plan to make a regional CPR, a residence center to repatriate migrants without the right of residence. According to Italian ‘Libero’, however, the government wants to decision on. The dispute exposes the stake: the state either enforces the migration law or surrenders to its own left.
CPR as a test of State gravity
Michele de Pascale, left-wing president of Emilia-Romania, rejected the thought of creating a CPR in the region, that is, an Italian residence centre to repatriate people without the right of residence. Italian regular “Libero” He reports that the politician has accused the government of “continuous polemic” and called for a change of rules. Rome, according to this account, does not intend to give way.
It seems to be a method dispute over the building and procedures. Indeed, the question is whether the State can make its own decisions towards persons who are not entitled to reside in its territory. The Italian debate is besides crucial for Poland due to the fact that it shows the same European mechanism: the left acknowledges that the strategy is not working and then blocks the tools to reconstruct control.
De Pascale talks about paradox
De Pascale took the level after visiting Dozza Prison in Bologna. According to Libero, he pointed to the problem of inmates without a regular residence permit. According to his arguments, they can work in prison, but after serving a penalty, if they are not regulated, in practice they fall out of the legal labour market.
This description touches on the real weakness of the European migration system. The diagnosis alone is not enough. If a politician considers that there is simply a problem of position and law enforcement erstwhile he leaves prison, then the answer cannot be to dismiss the repatriation decision. Without an effective return mechanism, the state produces a grey region and legal chaos.
DN already described how Italy and Dublin rules became a fuel for left-wing game fear of migration. Now you can see another side of the same disease. The words about humanitarianism sound good at the conference. The bill is later paid by city residents, police, prisons, and honest foreigners who respect the law.
Fratelli d’Italia strikes inconsistency
Marta Evangelisti, president of the Fratelli d’Italia club on the regional council, responded to De Pascale's speech. According to ‘Libero’, she accused him of inconsistency: first open to a discussion about CPR, then withdrawing under force from the utmost left in her own coalition. That's a good point. In migration policy, 1 cannot pose for realism and fear its own background.
The CPR dispute in Emilia-Romania has been going on for months. Cronaca Bianca Regional Service As early as February 2026, he described the pressures of Fratelli d’Italia, Forza Italia and any left-wing forces to make it clear whether they wanted specified a centre. This vagueness is politically convenient, but administratively deadly.
A borderless Europe does not work
The Italian example should be read in Poland without illusions. Uncontrolled migration does not end at the border of 1 country. If the South of Europe loses its ability to return people without a right of residence, the force goes on: Schengen, the labour market, the benefit strategy and interior security. That's why it's so crucial serious discussion on Schengen and migrationNot mockery and organization smokescreen.
Poland has the right to look at specified disputes through the prism of its own national interest. It's not about aversion to people. It's about order. A country that does not know who is in its territory, who is due to stay, who needs to be sent back, and how to execute an administrative decision, defuses its own sovereignty.
Lesson for Poland
Meloni built part of her mandate to promise to regain control of migration. If her government wants to put CPR in Emilia-Romania and the regional left responds to allegations of "speculation", then the Italian voters see a simple division. any people want the tools of the state. Others like a moral dispute that does not solve anything.
For Poland, the proposal is simple. all migration solution must be assessed by its effects: whether it protects citizens, whether it strengthens borders or allows them to implement return decisions. Europe needs little left-wing gestures and more state gravity. Without it, freedom of movement becomes helpless towards those who do not respect the laws.
Source: Libero, Cronaca Bianca, Il Resto del Carlino
Source: liberoquotidiano
![Poles have revealed who they criticize most frequently in conversations with their loved ones. The consequence may come as a surprise [POLL]]()
