A white van with dark windows stopped in front of 1 of the houses in the morning. The women's getting out voices intertwined with the men's. due to the fact that the gate was closed 1 of the people called the telephone number on the advertising board. After a while, a man came up from the home to the barrier and saw six or 7 people wearing t-shirts, leggings, and sweatpants with tattoos sticking out from under them, with short arms at his side, telescopic batons, and tasers attached to the belts.
They presented themselves as... a state taxation service from a city hundreds of kilometers away, commissioned by a local prosecutor. They waved plastic cards in his eyes. Note that he wants to see them in item erstwhile he has specified “guests” and take a photograph of the papers he met with a definite refusal – the photos are not allowed to be taken – you can compose the data.
The impression of the group leader suggested entering the building, despite the clear indication in front of the office that it was neither a "wanted" company nor a individual representing it. It is not uncommon in Poland that there are respective offices of companies in the building at 1 address...
They sought a completely different individual to “search the documentation” of the company with which she was to cooperate. It turned out that the individual “wanted” at the time was not there. This caused the surprise of unannounced “guests”. True, times erstwhile the working people in all their mass came to work on the 7th and sat in it until the 15th are gone, but seemingly it is not apparent to everyone that in the second decade of the 21st century you can work in respective places, run respective companies or just not sit on the stool all day.
When the receiving man called the “wanted” individual and tried to convey what was going on, 1 of the tattooed representatives of the state service began, making the alleged mines, “mongering” the talker and showing “the speech of the body” his impatience. In her "defence" she was reminded of the inadequacy of specified conduct, in her "defence" she was later written out of a card, an armed man who accused the instigated gentleman (who was actually doing them a favour – they could sit and wait for the return of individual from, for example, a two-week leave just begun...) "extending" and then "holding on to words". This gentleman at the time of his effort to evidence the data, the card was only graciously held for a minute and de facto made it impossible to identify it correctly.
After a twelve minutes, it turned out that the address data for the “search” was incorrect – they did call, but the servants do not know which church. It's all colorful and armed around the stomachs, so the group got in the car and drove away.
Mistakes happen. However, the question is: should the service work look like this?
Should people representing the Polish state be dressed at the time of authoritative intervention on behalf of the prosecution, not during secret operations or jogging?
Is their tattoos expected to come out of their clothes, and the way they behave match the behaviour of pretentious ladies from holidays all inclusive?
Is it a simple and standard case? Is there any way he can add weight to people in t-shirts and leggings?
Can it yet scope the people of the service that the persons (also bystanders and assisters (sic!)) who ‘tick’ them have the right to anticipate from them not only to show their identity card, not only to confirm their identity card and telephone data to the supervisor (as stated in the Ministry of Finance), but besides to evidence accurate data and verify these data in the applicable offices before they submit to another ‘action’ and enter into a further conversation with ‘guests’?
Finally, will officials and servants want to realize 34 years after the Polish People's Republic's reflection that we, taxpayers, are keeping them from the money taken from us by the government and should show us appropriate respect for it and behave in a way that does not reproach the seriousness of their service and the expected seriousness of the Polish state?
That's it. That's it.
But seemingly that's besides much of a request for today.
For the time being, the Ministry of Finance and its services under the Law of the Law and Justice of the European Union have been acting, for example, as in this history. After the po-psl regulation it was of course not better, and the mafia drank champagne for breakfast, lunch and dinner. It is simply a pity to even mention “red band” governments, due to the fact that everything is known.
The taxpayers ask themselves, then, whether the Confederation's greater influence on Parliament or possibly the government can change that? Or will much change to keep things the same?...
Wojciech Popiela
