Bold Declaration
Justice Minister and lawyer General Adam Bodnar referred to the case on Tuesday's “Piasecki's Talk” at TVN24. He explained that the period from surrendering immunity to charges. According to his information, by the end of February, Mateusz Morawiecki is to hear allegations concerning the organisation of the envelope elections, which were to be carried out with gross violation of the law.
It is already the end of this period from the resignation to the time of the charges, and as far as I know, by the end of February, the charges are to be made to Prime Minister Morawiecki, in the context of the envelope elections, that is to say, to take this decision on their organization in gross violation of the law," the lawyer General stated said on the show.
Who else should be afraid?
Bodnar was besides asked if another people could hear charges about the envelope elections. He explained that the committee of enquiry led by Magdalena Filiks had completed the work and sent the announcement to the prosecution. He added that a peculiar squad of experienced prosecutors was established in the Warsaw territory Attorney's Office, who deal with further stages of proceedings.
I think there are further actions on the horizon that concern those persons who are being notified by the committee of inquiry.
Bodnar did not say who it was, but it can be concluded that most most likely Jarosław Kaczyński, Jack Sasin and Michał Dworczyk. However, these 3 people do not close the possible list.
Elections not held
In January, the Sejm was asked to waive the immunity of Mateusz Morawiecki in connection with the enveloped elections. The Prosecutor's Office accuses him of exceeding his powers as Prime Minister erstwhile he ordered Poczta Polska to prepare correspondence elections for 10 May 2020 without a legal basis.
Morawiecki himself waived immunity, claiming that the charges were politically motivated. yet the election was held on 28 June at the polling stations. In September 2020, the WSA in Warsaw considered the Prime Minister's decision to be a flagrant violation of the law.
