MP Krzysztof Szymanski at Polsat News.
– I have 1 insignificant charge. This specialty that has been brought in, it contains a full package of different solutions. Why wasn't it published step by step? So we can get to know it?
I am in a very hard situation now, due to the fact that I saw the first published text yesterday. Our full organization camera was working on it, and this morning it abruptly turns out that there is simply a government auto-correction that is rather extensive. Everything's upside down and we're about to go to debate! And now, how are we expected to debate something we don't really know the content of?
I agree, now is the time, let's talk about it. But I'd like to see things like this in a more meaningful time. I don't say "later" due to the fact that I don't want to hold it. I'm saying, you've finished a package, 1 offer, right away.
How am I expected to vote for a specialty that contains not only flood solutions, but, for example, you are dealing with any things that do not like, specified as children's laptops – the program. A laptop for the student. Why there, why is it in the flood zone? What does that gotta do with anything?
It's specified a written school that we know from the time of Covid, where there was a mural, a specialty that had quite a few different recipes. There's no way to know. We broke our heads about why any articles were there in the first place, due to the fact that they were in no way connected.
And now there's gonna be a small blackmail, too, due to the fact that I'm not voting against. We gotta aid these people. But in the package, I'm expected to vote for things like hot potatoes that the government didn't want to talk about?
The Civic Coalition copies the actions of the PIS from the time of COVIDA!
They propose specifics, which contain quite a few non-obligation contributions.
What do student laptops gotta do with the flood?!? pic.twitter.com/HX4mKSvqVn
