Who pays for the orchestra chooses music
Isabella Brodace
For years, further governments have been unsuccessful in trying to solve the problem of tv and radio subscription. The majority of citizens respect this tribute as inappropriate and unfair. Why should we pay for tv in liquidation if we don't watch any of the programs it broadcast? Neither “questions for breakfast” nor “M like love” nor another idioms for which their creators and performers collect immense sums.
Notice that different old actors and erstwhile celebrities are for spitting on people associated with the right hand, rewarded with tiny roles in many productions. In various films and telenovelas he appears in tiny roles, for example, a small attractive old man, who erstwhile – it is hard to believe – was an idol and object of the sighs of a teenager, and naively and wrongly identified with the characters played, was considered a patriot.
Not only do the primitive cabotines awarded their own, many years of boring viewers with programs and intrepid participations in advertising participate in the spitting and barking of personalities on the right side of the political scene. besides age-old, as they say, passed by Greek-type scandalists. Unfortunately, besides the Nobel Prize winner Olga Tokarczuk participates It must be worth more to her than the Nobel Prize itself. I don't think she'd compromise so much for free.
But there is an excellent way to solve this problem in accordance with the ancient principle: “de guscibus non disputandum est”, which is explained in the unpopular language recently: “На вкус цвет товарища нет”. It's like language is liable for human actions. If we were to think of these categories after the experience of planet War II, German should be banned erstwhile and for all.
Back to the subscription. It would be adequate to encode access to various programs so that the viewer of a program would pay for access to this program. This is not only possible in a time of universal digitalisation, but simply easy. It works perfectly, for example. e-recept, the anticipation of introducing which was of large concern.
Then it would be revealed what people are watching and what they are willing to pay for. possibly then the marketplace mechanisms so praised by liberalist ideologists force stations to strive for the quality of broadcast programmes would work. The current billing task for tv and electricity bills brings this charge to the function of another average tribute draining citizens' pockets. To a taxation comparable to the celebrated chimney tax, or a taxation which functions during partitions. I don't think there's anyone so naive as to believe that a dark Polish peasant preferred to smoke in a fucking hut alternatively of building an average chimney draining smoke from a furnace. However, he was helpless against fiscal violence.
Even closer to the shrewd is the current proposal to introduce barrier taxes. Note that both sloping and possible taxation on the fence, as well as the disputed cadastral tax, are anti-civilisation taxes. They are the punishment for the economy. The well-maintained property, maintained in order, will be improved with greater cadastral value than neglected ruins, so it will be charged with more tax. The garden separated by a fence, grown with a taxation and will be rewarded with trampled, available to everyone. Besides, the smoky had a stigmatic role. The resident of the fucking hut was carrying a odor that marked him as if he had a sealed seal on his forehead – "poor man and filth."
Decent, a taxation on fences, a tribute on another people's fees not related to actually viewed programs are the classical actions of the possessor towards citizens of the broken and deliberately destroyed country.
The commune came back, literally. The torment associated with life in the russian sphere of influence took, among another things, from a immense number of absurd regulations that acted as a proverbial stick on a dog. They were activated erstwhile the authorities tried to stalk someone. For example, the area of the single household home could not exceed 110 square meters. It was seemingly rational. Warsaw lacked housing. People nested in basements called basements and ruins. It seemed unfair for a simple household to have a surviving area of 150 square meters.
But this limitation was only seemingly rational. If individual owned a construction site, he gathered materials and started to build funds frequently obtained from a abroad household it was pointless to waste these funds on besides tiny a surface. On Szarty Street in Warsaw, the Oval Office was created in this way as without trying on the White House. The architect was simply mistaken in calculations and realizing that the surface of the home exceeds the statutory 110 square meters he ordered – to amaze and live joy of passersby to teardrop down the walls of the recently formed salon and circular them. This villa was surviving proof that justice in the communist sense meant an equation down, a fair sharing of misery.
Of course, these restrictions did not apply to housing stolen from rightholders by various members and alternate members of the KC PZPR. They didn't gotta limit themselves. The systemic transformation was designed so that in alleged free Poland different alternate members and their progeniture did not lose anything from winning the privileges of Stalinism in Poland. After compromising public thefts specified as alleged privatization or property theft and thefts grown through specifically appointed institutions specified as FOZZ, the time came for a milder form of first capital accumulation.
Note that for all hard to realize career of a common exodus, a mediocre actor or an overly advertised graphoman is hidden in the background organization membership of parents, agents, or average informers. The liquidation of the subscription to the programmes actually viewed would be a real disaster for this Stalinist interest group.
