On Wednesday, the first gathering of the WHO Alliance for Food Safety ended. A gathering of the co-operating centres with the WHO, UN organisations and donors was convened to support the implementation of the WHO's Global Food safety strategy for the period 2022–2030.
Liberty Counsel Action summing up This initiative: "A fresh global governance plan has just started an alliance to control what you eat. The Alliance will have power over what food is produced, how it will be produced, managed and controlled – and where "food" will be distributed.
This fresh plan uses the "One Health" approach. Last year David Bell explainedOne wellness aims to usage fear to control us and justify our limitations, impoverishment and death. This is simply a cult based on fear of the planet and the people they say poisoned him. It is included in the WHO's amendments to the global wellness Regulations and the Treaty on pandemics.
The planet wellness Organization is a specialised agency The United Nations ("UN"). The UN is to become The Only planet Government.
On 6 and 8 May 2024. WHO Department of Nutrition and Food Safety, organized in collaboration with the U.S. Centers for illness Control and Prevention ("CDC"), hosted the first WHO Food Safety Alliance meeting.
The meeting, attended by the centres cooperating with the WHO and another institutions, aimed to support the implementation "WHO Global Food safety strategy for the period 2022–2030" ("Strategy"), which was adopted at the 75th session of the planet wellness Assembly in May 2022. It was planned that the strategy would be implemented within 8 years from 2022 to 2030, hence the years given in its title.
The WHO strategy sets global targets for "safety" of food to be achieved by 2030. "There is presently no global mechanics to adapt efforts in this area and to supply innovation and support to countries in a coordinated way," states the WHO. In an effort to fill this gap, the WHO convened a gathering of the WHO Food Safety Alliance to:
- develop the mandate of the WHO Food Safety Alliance, identifying its added value in the area of food-borne illness surveillance; and
- developing a draft work plan for the period 2023–2030 to aid countries accomplish the WHO mark for food-borne illness surveillance by 2030.
In a message issued on erstwhile days, the WHO expressed hope that the gathering would be attended by 64 WHO cooperation centres, UN food safety organisations and donors.
Reading "WHO Global strategy on Food Safety for the period 2022–2030: Summary", there appears to be 2 reasons for implementing global food safety. 1 is to prevent diarrhea and the another is to accomplish Sustainable improvement Goals UN ("SDGs").
"Dangerous food containing harmful levels of bacteria, viruses, parasites, chemicals or physical substances can origin acute or chronic diseases – including over 200 diseases, from diarrhea to cancer, which in any cases leads to permanent disability or death," the summary says.
"Food safety remains a public wellness precedence and plays a key function in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development", added.
This fresh strategy, as summarised, will contribute to the accomplishment of the SDGs and will be reviewed in 2030 erstwhile the planet is considering advancement towards the SDGs.
In fresh years, independent media have focused on the 2030 Agenda and many of them have become acquainted with its vile objectives. But possibly less people realize that Agenda 21 UN from which it originates Agenda 2030, includes all 21St century. In another words, the 2030 Agenda covers the period from a decade to 2030. Agenda 2040 covers the next decade. Then Agenda 2050 and so on until the last decade, and the final Agenda 2090 ends in 2099. So we should not be amazed erstwhile in 2030 we see a mention to "the planet will reflect on advancement made."
One wellness Approach to Food Control
As we read in the summary, "The strategy recognises that food safety is closely related to animal, plant and environment in which it is produced." That's the approach. One Health.
The summary continues: "The strategy calls on associate States [WHO] to consider the "One Health" approach erstwhile planning its implementation. This will enable national governments to detect, prevent and respond to existing and emerging diseases at the interface of human-animal-environment, and to rapidly respond and mitigate public wellness problems related to food resulting from these interactions."
WHO strategical Priorities
Starting from page 9, the summary describes 5 "strategic priorities" of the strategy.
"Member States should adapt, redesign or strengthen their national food safety systems accordingly based on strategical precedence areas and strategical objectives set out in the strategy", the paper states.
The WHO's first precedence is "to strengthen national food control systems". Although the word "control" is shown in the title, it is replaced by the friendly word "security" in the full summary. We can presume that if they're in shape, that's what they're doing with their plan, which seems mild. However, the review of "strategic precedence 1" (see below) clearly shows that the goal is control alternatively than "security".
In addition to legislation, policies, organization frameworks and control functions, the WHO associate States must consider and adopt 4 crucial principles to make the strategy more effective. The summary describes these principles as follows:
- Prospective – "Strategic precedence 2: recognition and consequence to food safety challenges arising from global changes and transformations in food systems". Food safety systems should be equipped to identify, measure and respond to existing and emerging problems. Food safety systems must be converted from reactive to proactive systems, in peculiar with respect to wellness risks arising at the interface between humans, animals, ecosystems and the environment.
- Evidence based – "Strategic precedence 3: Increase the usage of food chain information, technological evidence and hazard assessment in hazard management decisions". Data collection, usage and explanation form the basis for building evidence-based food safety systems.
- Focus on people – "Strategic precedence 4: Strengthen stakeholder engagement and hazard reporting". Effectively ensuring food safety from field to table requires a more inclusive approach involving all stakeholders, including authorised consumers and food business operators.
- Cost-effective – "Strategic precedence 5: Promoting food safety as an crucial component of national and global food trade". With the globalisation of food trade, pathogens and food-borne diseases can cross borders and origin serious wellness and economical effects.
UN control of national food control systems
To show full control of food supplies by the UN and its agencies, while at the same time implementing the "One Health" approach, we quote the following summary section (added links).
The general approach of associate States to develop, update and implement national food safety strategies is summarised in the figure below.
To analyse the situation tool developed by FAO and WHO may be utilized to assist associate States in assessing the effectiveness of their food control systems, regardless of their degree of progress. This tool can be utilized to measure the state of the national food control system, to identify strengths and weaknesses and to identify precedence areas for action.
In addition, the FAO/WHO tool to measure national food safety preparedness capacities can besides be utilized as a tool to jointly measure the external and electronic self-assessment of States Parties under the WHO global wellness Regulations.
In addition, the planet Organisation for Animal wellness (WOAH) pathway for veterinary services (PVS) is aimed in peculiar at assessing the safety of the production and processing of food of animal origin.
Following the basic assessment of the national food safety system, it will be possible to specify objectives and targeted interventions to strengthen the strategy on the basis of the 5 strategical priorities [sic] of the areas identified in this strategy.
WHO Global strategy on Food Safety 2022–2030: SummaryWorld wellness Organization 2022, p. 15
After analysing the situation, an implementation plan should be drawn up which will include the order of application of the various elements of the restructured food safety system, the recognition of roles and responsibilities and the establishment of a monitoring and evaluation system. To accomplish its objectives, the plan must have adequate resources and funding.
Once the plan is agreed and communicated, the implementation phase can be started. Regular checks on advancement and reports should form part of regular monitoring to guarantee that the plan remains on the right course or that appropriate course adjustment measures are applied.
Together with another WHO global partners, it will support associate States by providing global leadership ... WHO and FAO will make a common monitoring framework to adapt food safety strategies [countries] [emphasis added]
WHO Global strategy on Food Safety 2022–2030: SummaryWorld wellness Organization 2022, p. 16
"The plan must be adequately financed to accomplish its objectives" – financed by whom?
Monitoring, evaluation and objectives
This is where diarrhea emerges, mixed with even more surveillance and UN control. I'm quoting the summary again due to the fact that we just couldn't come up with it.
The updated strategy will be based on a accountability framework to measurement the pace of implementation. The updated strategy encourages associate States to choice indicators and targets at national level to measure the effectiveness and relevance of national food safety systems ... A global mechanics will besides be established to measurement the advancement of the strategy through a set of global indicators and objectives. The updated version of the strategy contains 3 global indicators:
- diarrhoea caused by contaminated food consumption;
- multisectoral cooperation mechanisms for food safety events; and
- surveillance of diseases transmitted by food and contamination.
The first indicator is continuously assessed by the WHO Food-borne Diseases Epidemiology mention Group. The second and 3rd of these indicators are already regularly monitored and measured under global wellness Regulations (2005).
The planet wellness Organisation (WHO) will make a framework for monitoring implementation and approving advancement towards these global objectives.
WHO Global strategy on Food Safety 2022–2030: SummaryWorld wellness Organization 2022, p. 16 and 17
Full text "WHO Global Food safety Strategy: 2022–2030" you can read HERE. Annex 2, starting with page 63, describes "food safety targets for 2030, the proposed method of gathering country commitments".
Three objectives have been set (see figure below): a 40% decrease in the global average of food diarrhoea (compared to 2010); 100 % of countries study to the IHR food safety index themselves (2005); and that the global consequence of food safety incidents is 3.5 – data to calculate the consequence are reported by countries and monitored within the framework joint external evaluation WHO ("JEE").
The JEE is now a voluntary, collaborative and multisectoral process of assessing the country's ability to prevent, detect and respond rapidly to public wellness threats, whether natural or as a consequence of intentional or accidental occurrences. This is simply a comprehensive evaluation that assesses the country's capabilities in 19 IHR method areas (2005).
How much longer will Jee be voluntary? Who will finance the WHO's "food safety strategy" indefinitely? Not us if #ExitTheWHO.
Translated by Google Translator
source:https://expose-news.com/
