The text was originally inspired by what was happening in the surviving room24, but I can see after a fewer arguments on the unreasonable that it might besides be useful here. It is besides a continuation of my comments regarding the dominance of liberal reasoning even in declarative right-wing forums.
Salonists request to learn something. And forge it.
Each stick has 2 ends - the stick is one, but the ends are two, with 1 being thicker than the other.
It's not a metaphor you don't care about.
This is simply a methodological premise erstwhile considering social issues. Social issues, especially in the case of Western civilization, have 2 aspects. We have a strategy sphere, and an individual sphere, a public sphere, and a private, collective and individual sphere.
The collective sphere has an evolutionaryly shaped advantage, so it is crucial to keep the existing fragile balance between the 2 spheres, which guarantees our freedom, but it is subject to respecting the full structure of social relations.
This chapter on 2 spheres is simply a feature of only Western civilization based on Christianity, so any effort to violate it, visible in the surveillance projects of the European Union and another akin ideas, resembling the behaviour of unwise sorcerers' disciples, should be combated.
And this is simply a basic methodological premise that all blogger should follow. Each partial model of political, systemic or social, regardless of scope, must be adapted to a more general model of civilization or model of the human species. If you can't get it in, that means it's fake.
