The presidential veto against the amendment of the alleged lex Kamilek has aroused hot emotions! Many voices can be found in the network, in which the decision of Karol Nawrocki was praised. "The President's decision is an crucial step towards the safety of Polish children – especially with respect to the dangers of sexual violence," said PiS MP Marcin Romanowski in social media, author in 2023 of the first Kamilka Act. "The innovation is so bad, so of course dangerous for children that it should not have been signed by the president at all" - stressed erstwhile Minister of Justice Marcin Warchoł.
President of the Republic of Poland Karol Nawrocki vetoed the amendment of the law on the prevention of threats to sexual crime and the protection of minors and any another laws, commonly referred to as Lex Kamilek.
The fresh provided, among another things, that schools would not require parents and guardians to certify the impunity from the National Criminal Registry, but only statements made under the punishment of criminal responsibility.
Responsible veto
The satisfaction of specified a decision is not covered on social media by law and justice politicians
I wonder how the ruling president Nawrocki's attack on the veto today, to which the Ombudsman of Children's Rights called them. due to the fact that they're going to try, I don't uncertainty it, we're already playing on emotions that “it's about children”
“ Radosław Fogiel pointed out.
The Ombudsman for Children's Rights says that this amendment lowers the standard of kid protection against sexual abuse, and the head of the club KO attacks the president that he did not sign it. Why do they want to exposure the children? is simply a image of Trzaskowski with a pedophile not enough?
He asked in another entry, responding to Zbigniew Konwiński's attack.
The very essential and liable veto of Mr. president Karol Nawrocki to defend children from sexual violence. As the author of the Kamilka Act, I am full aware that corrective or complementary action is always needed with specified a wide legal act. Unfortunately, the changes proposed by the government did not go in the right direction. Which is what the RPD besides pointed to. The President's decision is an crucial step towards the safety of Polish children – especially with respect to the dangers of sexual violence. alternatively of spoiling the bill, the Ministry should focus on real implementation of it, and both National Plans. It is simply a work for years and should take place in an atmosphere beyond divisions – just as works on the Kamilka Act itself were conducted in 2023. It's a pity that coalition politicians are manipulating this case on December 13 and utilizing it for political games and unjust attacks on the President
“The beneficiary of the asylum right in Hungary, Marcin Romanowski, erstwhile MS Vice-Chief, who, let us recall, was the author of the first Kamilka Act passed in 2023.
President Karol Nawrocki does not agree to alleviate the requirements for kid guardians to submit non-criminal certificates and veto another bill. For the sake of the children, no paedophile has any contact with minors. Good decision.
Mr Wójcik said.
President Karol Nawrocki rightly refused to deprive Polish children of protection! The authors of the veto amendment wanted those working with children to no longer gotta have a criminal evidence certificate of non-criminality, but it was adequate to make a statement. And people invited to classes with students were not to be checked at all. As a result, no 1 would be able to control whether pedophile or drug trafficker were in contact with children. The amendment is so bad, so of course dangerous for children that it should not have been signed by the president at all
said Marcin Warchoł, erstwhile Minister of Justice.
The president of the Republic of Poland, Karol Nawrocki, rightly vetoed the amendment of the Law on the Protection of Minors, the alleged Lex Kamilek. According to the Ombudsman, Monika Horny-Cieślak's amendment to the Law on the Protection of Minors lowers the standard of kid protection! During the debate in the Senate, the RPD claimed that:
Higher education staff and guests invited to school classes should bring a certificate from the CRK alternatively than their own statements. The Act provides that schools from parents and guardians will not require a certificate of non-criminality, but only a message made under strict criminal liability;
In addition, the amendment abolishes the work to double-check a person, e.g. the school will not gotta verify a trainer who has already been checked in criminal records by the sports club or the company in which he works.
In line with the amendment, there would besides be no work for police officers, lawyers, legal advisers or judges to present certificates to the school, from whom criminality is required. The certificate will besides not be needed by guests invited to the school classes, in which the teacher will attend
“ Senator Marek Pęk mentioned.
Changes threatening children
Bartosz Lewandowski besides spoke on social media.
Very good veto, Mr. president Karol Nawrocki
He stressed.
The proposed changes were dangerous for children. Let it show that the Ombudsman of Children’s Rights alerted the changes
“He added.
