Lech Wałęsa on 31 August 2026 in TVP Info called the actions of Jarosław Kaczyński and his environment a manifestation of "foolishness or betrayal", and Karol Nawrocki refused to accept as president without recalculating the votes. His words undermine trust in the state, although the authoritative results of the PKW and the ultimate Court resolution confirmed Nawrocki's election.
Sharp words on the anniversary of the August Accords
Lech Wałęsa was a guest of TVP Info on the 46th anniversary of the signing of the August Agreements and the creation of "Solidarity". In an interview with Aleksandra Pawlicka, the erstwhile president returned to the 1980 triumph of the social movement and then attacked Jarosław Kaczyński and his political surroundings.
Wałęsa stated that the achievements won were destroyed. erstwhile she asked who she was referring to, he pointed out “Kaczyński and the Company” and said, “It must be a fool or a traitor.” specified an alternate is not a political argument. It is simply a dense accusation against opponents, which millions of voters support.
The anniversary of "Solidarity" should remind you that freedom of speech involves work for the word. meantime This year's celebration of the August Accords showed a deep division of memory: Walesa and president Karol Nawrocki participated in separate programs. The ex-president's fierce attack has deepened this division.
The erstwhile president besides assured that he was not afraid of returning the right to power. He argued that his methods were losing effectiveness and that the mass media would prevent further, as he put it, “the lingering of people.” It's a political assessment that Wales has all right. The problem begins where the dispute over the program replaces treason charges, and citizens who support the another side are treated as people misled. specified language does not rebuild the community born in August 1980. It established the belief that only 1 camp has moral right to represent Poland.
Wałęsa refuses to admit the President
Even further, Wałęsa went in the opinion of Karol Nawrocki. He said Nawrocki was not the president for him, due to the fact that there was no recalculation of all the votes. He announced that he would recognise the consequence only after specified a calculation. A akin position was presented by the erstwhile president before.
Official facts are clear. By Notices of the State Election Commission Karol Nawrocki received 10,606,877 votes in the second round, or 50.89 percent. Rafał Trzaskowski received 10 237 286 votes, or 49.11 percent. The difference was 369,591 votes.
Then The ultimate Court on July 1, 2025 declared the validity of the election of Karol Nawrocki. You can criticize procedures, protest and request clarification of circumstantial irregularities. However, 1 cannot pretend that a constitutional office disappears due to the fact that a politician does not accept the result.
In this conversation, Wałęsa did not supply data that would undermine the figures announced by PKW. The recalculation of all cards is so a political request alternatively than a description of the legal state in force. In the law, doubts are settled in a circumstantial procedure and on the basis of evidence. The individual conviction, even expressed by the erstwhile President, does not replace either the minutes of the committee or the ruling of the court.
Trust in the State is at stake
Wałęsa's words have a peculiar burden, as it is spoken by the erstwhile president and historical leader of Solidarity. His biography does not give him the right to place his own designation above the voters' decision and the applicable procedure. An authority from the past should mean greater responsibility, not the privilege of insulting opponents.
For Poles, trust in elections and continuity of the state is at stake. erstwhile the consequence can be invalidated by the declaration of the lost camp itself, democracy turns into a plebiscite valid only erstwhile the “our” conquer. Poland needs a hard dispute over the program, sovereignty and security. He besides needs respect for the citizens' verdict. Without this freedom that “Solidarity” fought for, it becomes a tool of organization war.
Source: One News, State Election Commission, Supreme Court
![Poles have revealed who they criticize most frequently in conversations with their loved ones. The consequence may come as a surprise [POLL]]()
