Results of the vote of assurance for the government
453 Members voted on the Prime Minister's proposal. The vote of assurance for the Polish government was voted by 243 Members and Members, against 210 members of the lower chamber. No 1 abstained. After confirmation of the majority of the coalition's parliament on October 15, the cry "Donald Tusk! Donald Tusk!" spread.
Lots of questions for Prime Minister Tusk after exposé
Prior to voting on a vote of assurance for the Donald Tusk government, the Prime Minister went on to appear as a parliament speaker. He said no 1 expected long speeches. He added that the Coalition government had a serious work to do on October 15 with a reluctant president. “I do not know specified a word as surrender,” he stressed. He besides announced a government reconstruction in July.
– There is no earthquake, but the challenges proved more serious than we thought – said the Prime Minister before voting on the vote of confidence. He added that he had "convincence, faith, and assurance that he had a mandate to rule." More than 250 questions were submitted to participate in the discussion before the vote.
It was so clear that the vote originally scheduled for hr 14 could be delayed. The vote revealed that the Tusk government (as expected) survived the political turmoil.
Why Tusk applied for a vote of assurance for the government
As we wrote in naTemat.pl during the post-election message Donald Tusk announced that he intended to ask the Sejm for a vote of confidence. The vote is scheduled for Wednesday, June 11.
– The political reality is fresh due to the fact that we will have a fresh president, but the Constitution has not changed in Poland, our commitment has not changed and citizens' expectations have not changed. In Poland there is simply a government, which is simply a large duty, a large honour and, even if we feel that it may be harder than any of us thought it would be, then you are here from hard things and not easy things," said Prime Minister Tusk.
The vote of assurance was to be a kind of confirmation that the government inactive had a mandate to rule. It could besides be expected that the opposition after winning the presidential election could request a vote of distrust. Donald Tusk made a preemptive move.
