Vance, Rubio Call For Peace With Iran, Say Regime Change Is Not The Goal

dailyblitz.de 4 hours ago

Vance, Rubio Call For Peace With Iran, Say Regime Change Is Not The Goal

Update (11:37ET): Following President Trump’s new foreign entanglement – bombing Iranian nuclear facilities (which may or may not have taken them out while causing a deep divide amongst MAGA), Vice President JD Vance says he believes their nuclear program has been set back „many years,” and that he feels „very confident that we’ve substantially delayed [Iran’s] development of a nuclear weapon,” adding that it was US intelligence, not Israeli intelligence assessments, that led to Trump’s decision.

When asked if the United States is at war with Iran, he claimed „No, Kristen, we’re not at war with Iran. We’re at war with Iran’s nuclear program,” and called on Iranians togive peace a chance.

„They can go down the path of peace, or they can go down the path of this ridiculous brinksmanship of funding terrorism, of trying to build a nuclear weapon – and that’s just not something the United States can accept.”

„We didn’t blow up the diplomacy. The diplomacy never was given a real chance by the Iranians,” says @VP.

„The Iranians are clearly not very good at war. Perhaps they should follow President Trump’s lead and give peace a chance.” pic.twitter.com/pJ2tpqekom

— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) June 22, 2025

When asked if the US would support an Israeli assassination of Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Vance said that it would be „up to the Israelis,” and that the US position is „we don’t want a regime change.”

VP Vance: “No Regime Change” in Iran — U.S. Focused on Nuclear Threat, Not Government Overthrow

– In interviews (e.g. NBC’s Meet the Press), Vice President J.D. Vance emphasized the U.S. strike on Iranian nuclear sites aims solely to dismantle Iran’s nuclear program—not to… pic.twitter.com/TPOLWCvP06

— GlobalWire (@global_wire_) June 22, 2025

US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, meanwhile insisted to Fox News that „This is not a war against Iran,” adding „Not a shot was fired against us. They didn’t even know what had happened. By the time we left, the planes were out of their airspace before they finally started realizing they’d been hit. So it would be a terrible mistake if Iran retaliates. So but that’s not our goal.”

Secretary Rubio clears the air on whether America is „at war” with Iran.

„This is not a war against Iran.”

„Not a shot was fired against us. They didn’t even know what had happened. By the time we left, the planes were out of their airspace before they finally started realizing… pic.twitter.com/RslL7KbgUz

— Media Lies (@MediasLies) June 22, 2025

He also warned against Iranian retaliation, saying: „If Iran retaliates, it will be the WORST mistake they’ve ever made.”

RUBIO: It would be a terrible mistake if Iran retaliated.

But that’s not our goal. We are not declaring war on Iran. We’re not looking for war on Iran. But if they attack us, then I think we have capabilities they haven’t even seen yet. It would be a terrible mistake on their… pic.twitter.com/grpdHegkep

— Western Lensman (@WesternLensman) June 22, 2025

Rubio then warned Iran not to close the strait of Hormuz after Iran’s parliament backed its closure, saying „If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, it will be another terrible mistake. It’s economic suicide for them if they do it and we retain options to deal with that.”

Rubio:

“If Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, it will be another terrible mistake. It’s economic suicide for them if they do it and we retain options to deal with that” pic.twitter.com/6mXeYXJ6Te

— Visegrád 24 (@visegrad24) June 22, 2025

Everyone got the script?

Iran, meanwhile in a statement through spox Esmail Baghaei, accused the Trump administration of sabotaging diplomatic efforts – saying „They cannot talk about diplomacy, they betrayed diplomacy,” adding that „diplomacy never ends.”

Regarding the escalating conflict, Baghaei warned „No one knows what will happen next, but what is sure is that the responsibility of the consequences of this war must be borne by the United States and Israel.”

The Iranian foreign ministry declined to elaborate on Tehran’s likely response to the attacks, or to detail the extent of the damage – only saying in a statement to CNN that Iran „is entitled … to exercise its right of self-defense,” adding „And we will do that for sure.”

* * *

In a Sunday morning press briefing, Trump’s Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth declared that „Iran’s nuclear ambitions have been obliterated” – but also asserted that the attack did not target the Iranian people or civilians. He hailed the „incredible and overwhelming success” – following President Trump last night saying the same thing. „It’s worth noting the operation did not target Iranian troops or the Iranian people.”

Hegseth said this is part of the commitment of this administration’s vision of „peace through strength”. He continued, „Many presidents have dreamed of delivering the final blow to Iran’s nuclear program, and none could, until President Trump.”

For the „bold and brilliant” operation, there was weeks of preparation and precision logistics and „misdirection” at the highest level, involving B-2 bombers going to hit, Hegseth described. „No other country on planet earth” could have conducted this operation.

He also underscored that the Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) was used for the first time in US combat history – also that it was the longest bomber mission of its kind since 2001.

Just like [IRGC Quds Force General Qasem] Solemani found out in the first term, Iran found out when POTUS says ’60 days’ – that when he seeks peace and negotiation – he means 60 days of peace and negotiation, otherwise that nuclear program will not exist. He meant it.”

Hegseth then read aloud Trump’s post to Truth Social last night, soon after the three nuclear sites were struck:

„Any retaliation by Iran against the United States of America will be met with force far greater than what was witnessed tonight.”

That’s when the US Defense Secretary then warned, „Iran would be smart to heed those words. He said it before and he means it.” He tried to stress the 'limited’ scope of the attack and urged the Iranians to come back to the negotiating table:

There are both public and private messages being delivered to the Iranians in multiple channels, giving them every opportunity to come to the negotiation table, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth says at a Pentagon press briefing.

Scope of operation on Iran was „intentionally limited” Hegseth says he believes the US attack will have a clear psychological impact on how Iran views the future US strikes against Iran’s nuclear enrichment site at Fordow are believed to have destroyed capabilities there…

To review the details of what happened last night, the US deployed six B-2 bombers to drop 12 GBU-57 „bunker-buster” bombs on Iran’s heavily fortified Fordow nuclear site, marking the first time these massive 30,000-pound bombs were used in combat.

The enrichment sites at Natanz and Isfahan were also attacked. The mission lasted about 37 hours with multiple refueling missions.

While the White House is now claiming Iran’s nuclear facilities were „completely and totally obliterated,” officials say it’s too early to confirm the full extent of the damage.

America dropped six GBU-57 bunker buster bombs on the Fordow nuclear site pic.twitter.com/LaWrHm0c2d

— Vince Langman (@LangmanVince) June 22, 2025

Iran, along with international nuclear agencies, reported no radiation leaks, prompting skepticism about the strike’s effectiveness—particularly at Fordow, which is buried deep underground. Iranian officials said damage was minimal and mostly above ground. Iran’s Atomic Energy Organization vowed to continue its nuclear program, referring to assassinated nuclear scientists as „martyrs.”

Some degree of political backlash has quickly emerged over the lack of Congressional approval for the strikes. Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, despite previously mocking Trump’s diplomatic efforts with Iran, called for a War Powers vote, criticizing the president’s unilateral military action without a clear strategy.

Tyler Durden
Sun, 06/22/2025 – 11:35

Read Entire Article