The alleged "partner unions" Act is getting closer

Prime Minister Donald Tusk announced that the government would process the bill "partner unions". Minister Katarzyna Kotula has announced that the work is already underway. Will the Confederation support the project?

The Chancellery of the Prime Minister on the X portal published the words of Donald Tusk, who unambiguously announced that inactive This winter, the government will proceed with the alleged "partner unions" bill.

"We will be working on a bill on partnerships this winter" - Prime Minister @donaldtusk ??????????? pic.twitter.com/RVjw613eNM

— Prime Minister's Office (@PremierRP) December 27, 2023

The Minister for Equality, Katarzyna Kotula, does not hide the satisfaction that the bill will benefit from the alleged "gay pairs":

It has been 20 years since the first, filed in 2003 in the Sejm, the Law on Partnerships. LGBTQ+ people have waited besides long for equality. We're going with work and consultation on the law on partnerships. Stay tunedOh, my God!

It has been 20 years since the first, filed in 2003 in the Sejm, the Law on Partnerships. LGBTQ+ people have waited besides long for equality. We're going with work and consultation on the law on partnerships. Stay tuned! https://t.co/J3pNFbK1Dn

— Catherine Kotula (@KotulaKat) December 27, 2023

In addition to the question of polsatnews.pl about the anticipation of gay couples adopting children, she replied as follows:

We'll put those details on the table. We will talk to NGOs about the optimal version and how far the compromise we have been able to reach. I don't want to quit quite a few things, I want to come out with a task that makes life easier for many families.

Minister Katarzyna Kotula hopes to support the Confederacy.

Minister Kotula did not hide in her conversation with polastnews.pl that she was counting on the support of Confederate Members:

I hope that there will be Confederate Members who support this project. A organization called freedom should support life-saving solutions. The issue of access to medical information, inheritance, burial is simply a substance of order, so there should be no controversy.

It would appear that this is colloquially writing the "dream of a beheaded head", but Confederate politicians have not repeatedly ruled out the support of the alleged "partner unions" Act. A Confederate MP, Liberal politician of fresh Hope Przemysław Wipler in a November interview with “Super Express” supported the project.

If anyone wants to reduce the level of bureaucracy, make it easier for people surviving in their informal relationships... We're talking here... It doesn't even substance if they're gay or heterosexual. If individual wants to make life easier on the administrative, bureaucratic side, it is in line with the Confederate's deregulation of freedom," he said.

However, he assured that matrimony should stay privileged.

But if 1 wants to align different types of relationships with matrimony rights, that this is simply a de facto marriage, and the differences are symbolic, small, then again it comes to constitutional protection and the constitutional definition, which clearly states that matrimony is simply a relation between a female and a man, and specified a household is protected by the constitution," the Confederate MP added.

SEE ALSO:“Byt shapes consciousness”. Marx was a small right – a thing about “the revolution of julek”

Ineptly, Krzysztof Bosak tried to defend his fellow MP Accusing Nationalists.net portal of manipulation:

(...) no, simply the media manipulate, and the effect of these manipulations is referred by the editor. Even right-wing media manipulate sometimes.

The Confederate MP then disposed of the words of Przemysław Wipler quoted by the editor, claiming that his organization does not care to cover up differences between heterosexual and homosexual unions. This, however, is not due to 2 quotes by Mr Wipler, which fell during his interview for the Super Express.

If anyone wants to reduce the level of bureaucracy, make it easier for people surviving in their informal relationships... We're talking here... It doesn't even substance if they're gay or heterosexual. If individual wants to make life easier on the administrative, bureaucratic side, this is in line with the Confederate's deregulation of freedom.

It is worth reminding that the 2015 presidential candidate and the Polish MP in the fresh parliamentary elections Jacek Wilk in 2018 posted an entry on his Facebook page “Sex marriages and the Polish case”In which he wrote:

Many people (rightly) feel that civilizational and cultural standards have changed smoothly over time and into a configuration (nature/being) of matrimony (woman and man - ed.) no longer current in our civilization/cultural ellipse (or otherwise - that our civilizational/cultural standards have already changed in relation to possible/acceptable PUBLIC LAW + configuration+ marriage) and postulate - so - in order to let (recognize as marriage) another configurations of human relationships; at the same time, they most frequently presume that it is sexual (single) configuration, but there may besides be a change of +number configuration+ (which does not gotta surprise even the expanding influx of Muslims into Europe - who can and frequently want to have respective wives),

In order to address this "problem", Wilk proposed to... hold a referendum on this issue, which he, despite being a "traditionalist", will support. specified a referendum would include questions about "sex and number of spouses". As a ‘legalist’, Wilk would of course recognise the result of specified a referendum, but as a ‘Catholic’ he would inactive believe that the actual matrimony of his conventional form.

I will say even more: if the right majority of voters let single-sex (or multi-sex) marriages, the applicable amendment should be introduced into the Constitution - to settle this substance clearly erstwhile and for all.

nationalists.net/== sync, corrected by elderman ==