The Sejm did not reject the presidential veto of the crypto-activist marketplace bill, Karol Nawrocki's decision remained in force. There were 442 Members, 241 in favour and 198 against. 3 people stopped. It took 3/5 of all votes to reject a veto, or 266. Prime Minister Donald Tusk appealed for a re-vote last week. This was the 3rd effort to implement the bill.
442 Members took part in the vote, 241 supported the rejection of the President's decision198 of them opposed and 3 abstained.
To reject a presidential veto it takes 3/5 votes, which is in this case 266That means the Sejm ran out of 25 votes. If the required number were reached, Karol Nawrocki would be obliged to sign the bill.
The cryptocurrency Act. She was vetted 3 times.
The Krypotovalut marketplace Act was vetoed by Karol Nawrocki 3 timesLast June 11th. He argued that he supported the regulation of the sector, but the government did not take into account most of the proposals made by his law firm.
SEE: Charges for detainees of Zondacrypto. The D.A. gave details
Last Friday. Donald Tusk announced that he would turn to the marshal The Wizard to vote against the presidential veto again. During the Council of Ministers meeting, he stated that the issue of the Zondycrypto cryptocurrency exchange "takes shape, which truly gives emergence to any kind of horror."
The President's loud veto. Therefore, the cryptocurrency Act was rejected
- I'm sorry. present there is no uncertainty that this grim business, This dirty business was very closely linked to the full PiS environment and traces of funding, unusual movements of money between this business and the written media, leading PiS politicians, all this is becoming clearer and increasingly grim," said Tusk.
SEE: The Zondacrypto affair. There's a decision by the court of suspects.
The President's website argued vetoing the cryptocurrency bill too restrictive of the proposed provisions. Head of Nawrocki’s Office Zbigniew Bogucki explained, during the debate on the second vote on the matter, besides strict regulations may origin companies in the sector to shift their activity abroad, which would paradoxically make the situation of Polish customers worse, as they would not be protected by Polish supervision.
- I'm sorry. The veto bill gave the Financial Supervision Commission real tools to defend Poles and investors. It introduced the best standards, increased marketplace transparency and prevented abuse. In this bill, the state sided with citizens, in their defence against frauds and against scammers - said the Minister of Finance and Economy at the time Andrzej Domański.
mode: player aaaa: 
