Jakub Łaszkiewicz over the last years has built his designation on commenting on women's-men's relationships, criticism of alleged manosphere and online pick-up trainers, and his public image has mostly been based on the position of a sensitive, socially conscious and sidelined female in disputes about contemporary masculinity. All the more interesting was the information about the breakdown of his relation with feminist Daren Galitska. Daren in Emotional
She accused Łashkiewicz of treason.
Feminist Fall and Criticism of The Pick-up Wheels. The very past of the dissolution of Łashkiewicz's relation with Daren would be nothing special, as relationships end, people make mistakes, and even the most reasonable and moralistic people can make private decisions, but in the case of a individual who has made mockery of the behaviour of another men and moralizing on this main part of his public activity, there is simply a completely legitimate question about the consistency between the principles and his own behaviour.
If a individual regularly explains to recipients what toxic masculinity is, how women should be treated and why certain behaviours of men are reprehensible, it is hard to anticipate that, at a time of crisis, his individual life will be completely excluded from the same standards.
It is here that the wider problem of left-wing culture of "white knights", i.e. feminists, which build their social attractiveness and designation by declaring their peculiar sensitivity, empathy and support for feminist and deviative demands, is revealed. Of course, criticism of toxic behaviour alone is not reprehensible. The problem begins only erstwhile political and social views begin to service as a circumstantial moral certificate, and a individual who assumes the right slogans on the net automatically receives the position of a good, empathic and trustworthy person.
However, declared morality is not yet a character, as is public speaking about respect is not proof that man can actually be loyal, liable and honest to his loved ones. Character is first known erstwhile there is simply a conflict between self-interest and the principles that we have previously presented as important, due to the fact that it is easy to talk about empathy and ridicule narcissists erstwhile it brings popularity and lairs. It is much harder to behave decently erstwhile it requires giving up your own comfort, pleasure, or fresh opportunities.
Therefore, Łaszkiewicz's story, regardless of how yet all the circumstances of his breakup with Daren will be explained, should be primarily a informing against serious treatment of influencers as moral authorities. For years, a individual can say very reasonable things about relationships, psychology, or respect for another person, while at the same time completely not dealing with his own emotional life, due to the fact that the ability to talk about morality attractively is something completely different from consistent adherence to its principles.
This is why the case of Łaszkiewicz is more interesting as a social phenomenon than as another online “drama”. It shows how easy modern culture of influencers turns views into a individual brand and a individual brand into a character substitute. Algorithms reward people who can easy divide the planet into good and bad, conscious and toxic, progressive and backward, while real life is much little comfortable and requires the assessment of man not after his declarations, but after his actions.
So ultimately, it doesn't substance if individual introduces himself as a feminist and liberal. It matters whether he keeps his word or can be loyal erstwhile no 1 is watching, whether he takes work for his own decisions and whether he is able to apply to himself precisely the same standards that he applies to others so easily. For, ultimately, a man does not specify his slogan, declarations, or the number of people convinced of his moral superiority, but how he behaves erstwhile the cameras go out, the lairs vanish and no 1 watches.
Let's be honest: in the left-liberal environment, there are most narcissists. They take a completely different form than right-wing and conventional narcissists. This is confirmed by both hard intellectual investigation and regular net observation. Psychology distinguishes a circumstantial subtype of this disorder, which fits perfectly with modern activists and influencers: municipal narcissism.
How does left-liberal municipal narcissism work? Above all, the fuel for his ego is the expected moral superiority over traditionalists. conventional narcissist boasts of money, muscle or costly car. The municipal narcissist boasts in turn his goodness, empathy and tolerance. It builds a sense of its own uniqueness around how much it cares about the destiny of deviant minorities, climate or alleged "women's rights" (a fight for fresh women's privileges). He is considered to be "better" due to the fact that he stands on the "right side of history".
Importantly, Łashkiewicz is no exception. The past of fresh years has provided respective other, noisy examples of men who have publically declared support for feminism and the fight against sexual violence, and were subsequently themselves accused of harassment or another inappropriate behaviour towards women, frequently in their professional environment.
Such cases have occurred, among another things, in the media, movie and art industries, where the public image of a man as a spokesperson for women's rights has frequently proved to be a completely inadequate warrant of his real behaviour towards co-workers (e.g. Marcin Kącki).
Once again, it turns out that the darkest is under the lantern and left-wingness is simply synonymous with hypocrisy.
We besides recommend: Budanov inadvertently revealed the scale of Ukrainian losses in the war
