During the 1st May edition of "Graffiti" at any point an unexpected debate took place - the programme leader Marcin Fijolek connected remotely both Magdalena Biejat and Adrian Zandberg. Is there inactive a dispute between politicians? What did they gotta say about the ongoing campaign? And how do they feel about Donald Tusk's government?
During the program "Graphiti" in Polsat News, an unexpected situation occurred. At any point - during the conversation with Magdalena Biejat there was a organization candidate Together Adrian Zandberg. Biejat was in his group until recently, but decided to decision to the Left.
Left side mini-debate on Polsat News
Politicians didn't seem to be arguing.but writer Marcin Fijolek proposed mini-debate between them. He asked each candidate why it was worth voting for.
- I'm sorry. due to the fact that I am implementing this programme, which we are all talking about and promised to implement. Day after day, I'm preparing more projects. Not only the shortening of working time, but besides the strengthening of the State Labour Inspection - this, a task that was always crucial to the left to strengthen workers. It is besides a task that will let to include in the internship the period worked on "ploughs" and on one-man business activity, said Biejat.
SEE: A night military announcement. "Food for Russian Trolls"
Adrian Zandberg then spoke.
- I'm sorry. The horse as everyone sees. It is not a pro-social government, it is simply a liberal government, which in this dispute Poland stands on the side of selfishness and it is visible. due to the fact that most of the government pushes over solutions that are harmful to workers. We can build a pro-social, solidarity and fair Poland, and if you think so, I encourage you to vote for Together - Zandberg replied.
"Hi, Adrian!" - means first-class greetings over divisions on the left between @MagdaByjat and @ZandbergRAZEM. @marcinfijolekpic.twitter.com/Up7cdcCoI2
— Graffiti_PN (@Graffiti_PN) May 1, 2025
Brauna Biejat. "There is no place for hatred in public debate"
Earlier - in the first part of "Graffiti" - Marcin Fijołek asked Magdalena Biejat about her fresh words. The presidential candidate for the Left stated in a debate with Simon Holovnia that "These elections will be about the Left having a strong position in government".
- I'm sorry. In these elections, the voters will be able to clearly convey to the rulers which programme is most crucial to them. The vote for me is not just the vote for Magdalena Biejat in the presidential race. It is besides a vote for: a faster fight against the housing crisis, the introduction of full rights of women, the rights of workers - the senator said.
SEE: Ukraine has signed an agreement with the US. It's about natural materials.
"I'm not in this government to be nice." Biejat in "Graffiti"
Magdalena Biejat calculated the pro-social accomplishment of the government that co-creates her party. She mentioned, among others, the free Christmas Eve, the social individual allowance, the increase in minimum wage or royalties for people of culture.
The programme leader pointed out that the government had introduced respective liberal solutions, which the Left had by all means companyed. He asked his interviewer if there was a border punk that would lead to this group leaving the government.
- I'm sorry. I'm not in this government to be good and take care of the good sense of my coalitions. If they effort to push things that don't make sense, that's harmful, then I'm the 1 who's gonna talk about it. I am not afraid to take sides with average people in opposition to making gifts to large corporations or wealthy entrepreneurs. This red line is where the anticipation of making affirmative changes ends," she said.
- I'm sorry. I am a candidate who not only talks a lot, not only talks about this program, but besides implements it all day and fights for it. Along with the ministers of the Left. due to the fact that this government is not an easy government. It is simply a coalition government - composed of various parties. And yet we are able to implement this program. For example, a fight for workers' rights. Even in this hard and very liberal government - she added.
Marcin Fjołek asked his interviewer about fresh incidents involving Grzegorz Braun. A politician and his sympathizers broke up Wednesday night on Thursday at 1 of the town hall. Earlier, according to any commentators, he presented anti-Semitic and xenophobic content during the presidential debate "Super Express". Due to these statements, Biejat decided to study him to the D.A.
- I'm sorry. I hope the D.A.'s office works rapidly and efficiently. That he will rapidly apply to the Europarliament to waive his immunity and that this man will be liable for what he is doing. He's been tricking people under the cover of the run today. It builds an atmosphere of hatred, a run for specifically groups, whether they are doctors or cultural minorities for specified hatred there is no place in public debate - she said.
Presidential election. Adrian Zandberg: Tusk returned to old Tusk
After a brief exchange of views, the co-leader of the Party, who took the level He was the second guest of "Graffiti". The politician did not hide his critical opinion of the majority ruling.
- I'm sorry. The basic problem is that this is simply a government that transfers the cost of keeping the state to employed workers to give gifts to those who are rich," said Adrian Zandberg.
SEE: How many apartments does Karol Nawrocki have? "He never hid it."
- I'm sorry. The question must be answered is whether the place of pro-social politicians is on the side of this government, supporting Tusk, who in many ways returned to old Tusk - this Tusk, which erstwhile gave Poland garbage contracts and forced millions of Poles to emigrate to London, continued the politician.
According to Zandberg, the current government is "disappointing"in both social and economical matters.
Zandberg will commend the government? Politician pointed to PRL
Marcin Fjołek asked the co-leader together if he inactive saw any affirmative signals in the fresh majority.
- I'm sorry. Of course, in all strategy you can find two, three, 4 small, tiny things that will improve. There were besides people in the PRL who went to the PZPR to do any good things locally. There is besides a larger image and this larger image here and now is that it is simply a liberal government - a government of selfishness, not social solidarity - he pointed out.
According to Zandberg, people who persist from working with average earnings "are actually burdened to a greater degree than the richest ones and that is simply unfair".
- I'm sorry. In average European taxation systems, those who are very The rich add up proportionally more to the common basket – this is not happening here. This government, this system, is even more corrupt – even more has been doing publishing for the richest at the expense of the employed workers - the politician scored.
https://ipla.pluscdn.pl/dituel/cp/yv/yv45wmetkytk27p2x587c9wb39343qj1.jpg config.poster 
