American-Chinese "war" on human rights

A number of articles published last week on the Global Times cannot be ignored text reporters of this average Chinese Ministry of abroad Affairs: American human rights reports full of lies, ideological prejudices (US human rights reports full of lies, ideological bias: Chinese FM).

"American national reports on human rights practices of 2022 are 'full of lies and ideological prejudices, and stereotypes are repeated year after year and not worth even overturning'," said the Chinese Ministry of abroad Affairs on Tuesday (21 March). What the planet sees from this year's reports is not human rights practices in different countries, but hegemonic and intimidating practices; and

double standards

United States alone, said the spokesperson for the Chinese abroad Ministry Wang Wenbin at a regular press conference, asked to comment on the reports. Reports published on Monday include 198 countries and regions. The study on China has 87 pages and contains unwarranted accusations of alleged genocide and crimes against humanity in the Chinese Xinjiang region, as the authors of the U.S. study have already highlighted in the introduction, and what has happened to the large discontent of Chinese authorities and experts.

The United States has long regarded itself as a lighthouse for human rights and has frequently thoughtlessly criticised the situation in another countries. But in fact human rights are only a tool utilized by the US to unite its allies and partners to suppress opposition, he said “Global Times” Jia Chunyang, expert at the Chinese Institute of Contemporary global Relations.

The study besides lists any alleged human rights violations by Chinese governments in the Hong Kong peculiar Administrative Region (HKSAR). In response, on Tuesday, a strong opposition was besides expressed by the Chinese MFA Commissioner's office in HKSAR. The study carelessly blurs (smears) the human rights and regulation of law situation in Hong Kong, maliciously slanders (viciously slander) national safety laws and the fresh electoral strategy in the city, as well as slanders the law-based government of HKSAR, said the office's press spokesman. According to him, it is simply a public interference in Hong Kong and China's interior affairs, noting that the related content in the reports is just a patchwork of misinformation. Accusations of alleged suppression (suppression) of human rights are simply American-style discrimination and unjustified accusation. The Ombudsman noted that the human rights standards that the United States forcefully imposes on others are just political tools to suppress opposition and

the pursuit of hegemony.

So-called reports on Human Rights in Washington has been published by the State Department for almost 50 years (2022 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices). Countries mentioned by the United States as “unfriendly countries” and competitors are frequently on the list, while US “friends” have barely always been on it, have been noted by experts. This shows that for Washington, whether a country has “human rights” and whether it is “democratic” depends on whether it obeys the US and cooperates with the US in geopolitics. Human rights have become a bargaining chip in trade, assistance and diplomatic relations, and alleged yearly reports have become an American price list for extortion and extortion of another countries, as well as a pamphlet for demonizing and suppressing competitors," said experts. The same day the United States published reports on human rights, which ironically commemorated the 20th anniversary of the US invasion of Iraq,

China besides published a study

revealing the collapse of American democracy and the chaos that Americans brought into the planet under cover of the promotion of democracy. ‘No reciprocity is simply a rude behavior. While the U.S. is eager to look for problems for another countries, China's study helps the planet admit the actual face of the USA', said Chinese MFA spokesperson Wang Wenbin at a Tuesday press conference.

Wang noted that the Chinese study presents a full and actual image of American democracy over the course of the year – not only showing American democracy in chaos in the country, but besides depicting the havoc and disaster that the United States has brought by interfering and imposing democracy around the world. Wang said the United States would hold the second Summit for Democracy on 29 and 30 March. But these moves cannot hide the fact that the United States utilized democracy as a weapon and promoted a peculiar policy (group politics) to service its own hegemony”.

It should be noted that the U.S. Secretary of State Antony Blinken during presentation The study devoted quite a few time to the People's Republic of China. However, he put the President's visit first. Xi Jinpinga in Moscow: "We anticipate China to usage this visit to re-call for ceasefire as part of its peace proposal. The United States welcomes any initiative that promotes fair and lasting peace. China's proposal contains elements that we have long supported, including atomic safety, the resolution of the humanitarian crisis, the protection of civilians. Indeed, the first component calls for the protection of the sovereignty, independency and territorial integrity of all countries. The fundamental component of any plan to end the war in Ukraine and bring about fair and lasting peace must be to defend Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity, in accordance with the United Nations Charter. Any plan that does not prioritise this critical rule is, at best, a stalling maneuver or simply aims to facilitate an unfair outcome. This is not constructive diplomacy”.

It should be admitted that by making these words on the 20th anniversary of American aggression against Iraq, breaking the principles of the United Nations Charter, Secretary Blinken has proven to have a large sense of humor. The State Secretary besides ‘forgotten’ that the sovereignty of states besides breaks the organisation of coups in another states and

overthrowing their legal authorities.

It is impossible to accurately present the current situation in Ukraine without recalling events at the turn of 2013/2014 and to analyse the actions taken against Ukraine at the time by the United States of America and the Russian Federation.

The territorial integrity of Yugoslavia should besides be recalled. Is the Secretary of State’s message to be interpreted as opposition to the US pressure Germany and France to Serbia on Kosovo? It is adequate to remember these 2 matters to take seriously Chinese accusations against the US of applying double standards.

Speaking of Blinken's speech: "A call for a ceasefire which does not include the withdrawal of Russian troops from Ukraine would be an effective support for the ratification of Russian conquest. It would recognise Russia's attempts to take over the territory of a sovereign neighbour by force. This would let Russia to further strengthen its position in Ukraine. And the ceasefire now, without a lasting solution, would let president Putin to remainder and reorganize his troops and then resume the war in a time more beneficial to Russia. The planet should not be deceived by any tactical movement of Russia – supported by China or any another country – to frost the war on its own terms. specified a decision would violate the United Nations Charter and

It would hold – it would oppose, sorry

– he prefers 141 countries that condemned Russia's war in the UN General Assembly. 1 of the parties to this conflict – Ukraine – has already presented the expression of fair peace. If China commits to supporting the end of the war on the basis of the principles of the United Nations Charter, as set out in the first point of its plan, it can on this basis engage with president Zelenski and Ukraine and usage its influence to force Moscow to retreat its armed forces. The alleged (purported) annexation by Russia of the sovereign territory of Ukraine, including vast areas that it does not even control, and the ongoing violent attacks on the civilian population clearly show that president Putin is not presently curious in specified a room.

The fact that president Xi goes to Russia a fewer days after the global Criminal Court issued an arrest warrant for president Putin suggests that China does not feel liable for bringing the Kremlin to justice for the crimes committed in Ukraine and alternatively of condemning them, alternatively give diplomatic cover to Russia to proceed to commit these crimes.”.

It should be recalled here that neither China nor Russia nor the United States recognise the jurisdiction of the ICC towards their own citizens. There's nothing amazing about it. As the American liberal theorist of global relations explained John Ikenberry: “No state is above the law. Nevertheless, hierarchy may be insofar as rules and institutions supply peculiar rights and exceptions to the leadership state". This U.S. position is what American Liberals called a "liberal Leviathan," and as you can see, they follow this doctrine.

The question of human rights should be given a small more attention. As you can see, it is an instrument for conducting a abroad power policy, but besides a subject of more sound technological reflection. Here you should pay attention to a fresh book published in Poland Degeneration of human rights. Its author is the French doctor of law, an expert working for the diplomatic services of the Holy See Gregor Puppinck.

Opp. MH