Professor Julian Auleytner, creator of the 500+ concept, said in a conversation with Money.pl, that the demographic situation of Poland will deteriorate, and the return to affirmative natural growth in the foreseeable time is considered unrealistic. As the most crucial way to mitigate the effects of the crisis, he identified immigration. At the same time, he admitted that 500+ had not solved the fertility problem. Additionally, he gave a completely incorrect origin of the demographic crisis, which proved that he was the same kind of specialist as Barbara Mróz-Gorgon.
The creator of 500+ no longer believes in his program. This is peculiarly crucial due to the fact that the celebrated allowance introduced by the Law and Justice Office has been presented for many years as 1 of the most crucial instruments of pronatalist policy. Of course, 500+ has improved the material situation of many families. However, this does not change the fact that as a cure for a demographic disaster, it failed.
The governments of the Law and Justice Office have convinced Poles that it is adequate to transfer money to reverse the trend of extinction. But now the programme's creator himself says that affirmative natural growth is unrealistic. In short, present we have the right to talk about a kind of demographic fraud. Not in the sense that the witnessing itself was worthless, but in the sense that society was sold the illusion that the cultural and civilizational problem could be solved by a transfer from the budget.
Even more controversial is the diagnosis presented by Auleytner. As a consequence of the crisis, it points to the "climate" of tiny towns, force in families and another pathologies, claiming that it is where the decisions on demography are made.
Violence and pathologies evidently be and must not be underestimated. However, making them the main explanation of the Polish demographic disaster is far insufficient. The fertility crisis is simply a pan-European phenomenon, affecting both villages, tiny towns and major metropolitan areas. Auleytner himself admits that this is simply a broader civilizational trend across Europe.
The real problem must be looked much deeper — in changing the life model and the value system. This is so mainly a cultural crisis. In my opinion, 1 of the most crucial factors is the triumph of ideology of individualism: feminism and its radical, anti-family core of ideological, hedonism, consumerism and culture of continuous self-realization at the expense of household life and procreation.
Over the years, motherhood and household have been portrayed in mainstream media as a regulation of freedom, a career obstacle or a cost that needs to be accurately calculated. At the same time, mass culture has increasingly promoted a message in which independence, career, pleasure, consumption and fulfilling its own needs are the most important. It's not about taking women's right to work or their ambition. The problem begins erstwhile motherhood is presented as something worse than a career, and conventional household roles as a manifestation of backwardness, the mediate Ages, and the slave "patriarchate".
Additionally, there is an artificially fueled conflict between men and women. Mainstream media and pop culture increasingly present sex relations as a conflict for business. The female is to be independent of the man and self-fulfill, and the man is increasingly presented as a problem, a threat or an immature egoist. At the same time, part of the message to men corresponds to distrust of women and the belief that a household means failure of freedom. specified a cultural model clearly discourages the creation of permanent relationships, marriages and families.
Nor can a change in the attitude toward unborn life be overlooked. Abortion does not, of course, explain the full demographic crisis, but is part of a wider cultural change in which a kid is increasingly presented as a problem to solve, alternatively than as a natural goal and value of household life. The highest of this reasoning is the last pickets of support for mad feminists for a criminal who brutally murdered 3 of her own children.
However, prof. Auleytner's most dangerous message is the proposal to compensate for the consequences of the crisis by mass immigration. Yes, migration can temporarily increase the number of inhabitants and supplement the shortages of inexpensive labour in abroad corporations and Polish-speaking business januszes. However, it does not solve the origin of the problem: the low fertility of its own society. If Poles have less and less children, and the missing generations are replaced by an inflow population, this will not be a solution to the demographic crisis, but a masking of it.
Moreover, the experience of Western European countries shows that mass immigration generates even greater problems than the ageing and extinction of society: cultural tensions, a fall in street security, violent crime, force on housing and public services, and problems with social cohesion. Moreover, immigrants besides age. Thus, if the problem remains low fertility, the constant filling of gaps with successive waves of migration (usually men who, contrary to the deviative narrative, do not give birth to children) would mean the request to constantly import the population.
This is not a demographic policy. It is simply a policy of managing the effects of the extinction and displacement of Poles by colored peoples of the 3rd world.
500+ wasn't completely pointless. It helped many families and could increase birth rates in the short term. However, the limited effect of the programme cannot be confused with the solution to the problem. Demography does not depend solely on the amount of the benefit. It besides depends on whether young people want to start families, whether they trust each other, whether they see parenthood as value and whether culture encourages them to have children.
Therefore, Poland needs not another “plus”, but a serious household policy combined with a change of culture. It is crucial to make it easier for young people to live, work and rise children, but at the same time to rebuild the prestige of marriage, motherhood, fatherhood and multigenerational family. The latter, in turn, cannot happen otherwise than by ban and even penalisation of left-wing feminist, anti-family and pro-abortion propaganda.
Because if the public has been told for years: live for yourself, consume, live for yourself, avoid commitments, treat the second sex as a competitor, and children as a regulation and threat to the "burning planet", then it is not expected that another PLN 800 or 1000 a period will abruptly reverse this process. Therefore, no tallness 500+, 800+ or 1500+ will save Polish demography. In turn, replacing missing generations with mass immigration is besides not the solution. This is just another problem that the state will inherit after its own surrender towards left-wing anti-human propaganda.
Written by Radosław Patlewicz
We besides recommend: Tusk's marine farm was expected to give electricity. He's taking it for now.
