Frederick Forsyth in his late released memoirs tells how the GDR authorities sold tv sets with a blockage on broadcasts from West Berlin. It is worth noting that this was already in the late 1960s, long after the revolts in communist Germany, in 1 of the most disciplined states of the russian bloc. And yet almost everyone had a friend who, while repairing the TV, "unwantingly ruined" something – and the forbidden program reached home.
It looks a bit akin to Donald Tusk's fight and the election staff of Rafał Trzaskowski to make the transmission uniform and set. The more they try, the worse it gets, and the concession-regulatory movements these days have small chance of success. Moreover, trying to compression all tv sets with a limiter into 1 candidate makes people more eager to scope for a competitive message.
Forbidden Songs
That's what happened in Horses. If Rafal Trzaskowski's staff had not tried so hard, if public tv had not helped him so much and if he had not added his 3 cents a fewer days earlier, we would have a debate that would have changed little. Oh, yeah, we've had any debates that change a lot. Even if Trzaskowski wins the election.
This is due to the fact that a news bubble was pierced, in which supporters of the Civic Coalition and – albeit partially – coalitions were tried to close. Besides, it worked for a while. But during the debates for this "chamber of echoes" – as the Anglo-Saxons rightly call it – received unwanted sounds.
The recipient saw any things he did not gotta see: pre-election abuse, a conflict with the electoral code, a candidate actually moving distant from others, completely self-righteous supporting his strategy of power.
See also:
The opponents, but the coalitions, benefited. Simon Holovnia rebuilds his position, amazingly showing that he is simply a better rally politician than a tv debater.
Sławomir Mentzen – not due to his fault, but due to the sloppy and most likely illegal machinations of his opponent – lost due to the fact that he did not arrive at the ad hoc debate.
He got Charles Nawrocki. There is besides another failure of the full communicative – not participating in the election Władysław Kosiniak-Kamish. The deficiency of PSL voice in debates can be very, very costly – for both the leader and the full party.
Mandatory option
Imageally, Trzaskowski was harmed by not so much himself as his staff and allies. He was expected to be a loose candidate, with pop culture schnitzel and countercultural styling, and became a forced option mandatory as a school appeal. Supporting candidate KO commentators, who collectively assured that the fight in Koński meant nothing but strengthened its meaning.
This surely will not aid the president of Warsaw to change palaces. Although so far polls are comparatively merciful, due to the fact that they inactive indicate triumph in the second round. But even if Rafał Trzaskowski succeeded, he would gotta face the falling popularity, memity, deficiency of trust – but besides the usual sympathy he likes.
He can thank the overzealous who wrongly felt that those with strength and power could decide what people would see. In the long run, specified a plan has always failed in Poland – and present changes and social reactions are much faster than before.
There is simply a second question, which present only naive, hypocritical and detached from reality, you can include me, 1 of these groups. Will the participants of the organized march and the quarrelsome common decision always talk again?
Viktor Shinelik
Kierwiński in “Guest of Events” about the rising cost: Inflation is much lower than under the Law and JusticePolsat NewsPolsat News
Do you have suggestions, remarks or see a mistake? Write to us