Trump is neither the end nor the beginning nor even the gamechanger

It would seem that in the full disaster, Trumpism will at least consequence in a vibrant publicist trend. But it's most likely worse than expected. So on the 1 hand, we have all this fascism scare, all these books about fresh fascism, these lame historical analogies with betrayal in Munich. And after all, Trump and his salesman Vance have said nothing another than to say for years: Ukraine will not enter NATO and will not return to its borders before the invasion. Of course, this does not mean losing Ukraine, but on the contrary. The country defended itself against 1 of the largest armies in the world. Meanwhile, the atmosphere is as if tanks were about to enter Kiev. On the another hand, we have all these quirks, that Trump has any hidden purpose, is not radically different from his predecessors, brings out any libs from 40 years ago and explains that this is actually the same thing. No, it's not. He's an unprecedented Trump, even for a political class, a moron, there's no large plan. The kind can barely read and hold attention for more than 5 minutes. All American politics are 1 large chaos, whose accident is who gets into the ear of an American kunigas faster. Let us yet halt pretending that the king is not naked, and specified Vance did not come just to loosen EU regulations for tech-billionaire companies.

In addition, the full mess is imposed on the unusual belief that Trump would be the end of an era of another era of beginning. They'll announce or culminate in any right-wing wave. This wave, yes, it does exist, but, stupid thing, its effects look a small different than they might seem. In the UK a average left wins, in Spain a average left rules, in France a average and unmoderate left together makes a historical score, in Germany a average left will most likely regulation in an alliance with chadeks. Orban has had the worst results in years, and even in Poland, the Confederacy was to wipe out the Left, while 14 months ago she lost her election. Sam Trump, he did win, but his advantage in marginal vote is minimal. Word is, the planet is not right. The planet is polarized, where, yes, the right has grown and changed, but that doesn't mean it's ruling yet. At the same time, this belief in Trumpism as the fresh Zeitgeist of the planet is so comic that the same people frequently shout how the planet is unstable and unstable. Well, if he's wobbly and unstable, then the Trumpism can or should be wobbly, right? And as part of this wobblyness, he can immediately strike out any fresh Obama in the United States to halt Trump's madness. In this sense, this sucking up of Polish politicians to the far right looks highly tasty, and I have the impression that on the basis of contrast, 1 of strong and credible, which will hit Trumpism, and will not drool to it in the full group.

Of course, this does not mean that nothing has changed. Yes, a lot has changed. simply fueled by consumption, a immense increase in aspiration overcapacity (own apartment) combined with nostalgia for lost sense of safety (war, pandemic) and media revolution, where a bottom-up voice gains support (it is youtube that is simply a gamchanger not a twitter) makes times, yes, we have populist. Only that populism does not necessarily mean the regulation of the right. It may mean the reflection of the libel center as 1 alternate to the walking “fascism”. After all, for a good origin in the U.S., Democrats don't gotta do anything, they just gotta wait for what this clown is doing again. For the first time in a fewer years Trump has according to 5 thirds 8 more opponents than supporters of his own politics. In Poland it fundamentally works similarly, the fear of our local Trump, as they think Kaczyński, is the only thing that binds this coalition.

Finally, somewhere at the end, all these innate pro- and anti-trump arguments lurk possibly the most underestimated origin of the change of power in the populist world. This origin is, frequently underestimated besides by the left, inflation. Did Trump not win not due to the fact that anti-woke, but due to the fact that American norms had adequate inflation problems? Isn't this inflationary decline the origin of the advanced rates of the president of Argentina from the crouch on the reddite? Did the writing not lose due to the fact that inflation frightened people and even erstwhile calmed down this fear continued. And won't she kill Orban? More importantly, is it not that this inflation year-to-year does not should be gigantic, but a society accustomed to surviving without inflationary leaps and unprecedentedly in past bombarded with inflationary fear, simply will support anyone who promises to soothe that fear? If so, and the Trump government a small consequence to this, it may turn out that all this right-wing wave will break down attempts to tame inflationary fear, which is so easy to master, to tame in no way. But the numbers are rather resistant to propaganda.

Traditionally, you liked the lyrics. He can buy tea with lemon.